Advertisement

KSME International Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 7, pp 517–523 | Cite as

Design of an observer for quantized output systems using orthogonal projection

  • Joono Sur
  • Young-il Park
Materials & Fracture · Solids & Structures · Dynamics & Control · Production & Design
  • 98 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a state observer for linear systems with quantized outputs. The observer employs an orthogonal projection operation at quantizer output discontinuities to enhance its convergence rate for quantized output systems. Although there may be a significant quantization error on average, it is possible to design observers with an exponentially stable tracking error. We explain how to construct the orthogonal projection operation in a Hilbert space and prove the stability of the proposed observer by using the Lyapunov second method. In order to assess the value of the orthogonal projection operation in the proposed observer, the simple motor system with an optical encoder has been analyzed numerically.

Key Words

Observer Quantized Outputs Orthogonal Projection Lyapunov Method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Curry, R. E., 1997, “Estimation Control with Quantized Measurements,” Cambridge. MA: M. I. T. Press.Google Scholar
  2. Joono Sur, 1997, “State Observers for Linear System with Quantized Outputs,” Ph. D. Thesis, University of California at Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  3. Delchamps, D. F., 1988, “New Techniques for Analyzing the Effects of Output Quantization in Feedback System,”Proceedings of the 1988 Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, Princeton, NJ, pp. 228–232.Google Scholar
  4. Delchamps, D. F., 1989a, “Controlling the Flow of Information in Feedback Systems with Measurement Quantization,”Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Decision and Control, Tampa, Florida, December.Google Scholar
  5. Delchamps, D. F., 1989b, “Extracting State Information from a Quantized Output Record,”Systems and Control Letter 13, pp. 365–372, North-Holland.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Khalil, H. K., 1992,Nonlinear Systems, NY Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Friendland, B., 1986,Control System Design, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Miller, R. K., Michel, A. N. and Farrel, J. A., 1989, “Quantize Effects on Steady State Error Specifications of Digital Feedback Control Systems,”IEEE trans. Automat. Control, Vol. 34 No. 6.Google Scholar
  9. Schweppe, F. C., 1968, “Recursive State Estimation: Unknown but Bounded Errors and System Inputs,”IEEE Trans. Automt. Control, Vol. AC-13, pp. 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haller, G. and Steppan, G., 1996, “Micro-Chaos in Digital Control,”Journal of Nonlinear Science, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 415–448.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Joono Sur and Brad E. Paden, 1996, “State Observer for SISO Linear Systems with Quantized Outputs,” CCEC-96-0520 University of California at Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Joono Sur and Brad E. Paden, 1997, ”Observers for Linear Systems with Quantized Outputs,”American Control Conference, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 3012–3016, June.Google Scholar
  13. Rotea, M. A. and Williamson, D., 1994, “Optimal Realization of finite Wordlength Digital Controllers via Affine Matrix Inequalities,”Proceedings of American Control Conference, pp. 445–449.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (KSME) 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joono Sur
    • 1
  • Young-il Park
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNaval AcademyChinhae KyungnamKorea
  2. 2.Department of Naval ArchitectureNaval AcademyChinhae KyungnamKorea

Personalised recommendations