Proceedings: Animal Sciences

, Volume 94, Issue 2, pp 153–160 | Cite as

Extraretinal photoreception involved In photoperiodic effects on gonadal activity in the Indian murrel,Channa (Ophiocephalus) punctatus (Bloch)

  • S K Garg
  • S K Jain


The effects of blinding onChanna punctatus exposed to LD 14:10, 12:12, 9:15, continuous dark (DD) and continuous light (LL) was studied during the winter quiescent phase of the annual reproductive cycle. Ovarian weights of blinded fish exposed to LD 14:10, 12:12 or LL were higher than those exposed to LD 9:15 or DD. However, no effects of blinding on testicular recrudescence under any photoperiodic regime were observed. Studies suggest that in addition to the eyes, other extraocular photoreceptors are also involved for gathering information on day length.


Channa punctatus photoreception extraretinal extrapineal blinding gonadal response photoperiod 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borg B 1982 Extraretinal photoreception involved in photoperiodic effects on reproduction in male threespined sticklebacks,Gasterosteus aculeatus; Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 47 84–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Delahunty G, Scherck C B, Spencer J, Olcese J, Vodicnik M J and de Vlaming V L 1979 The effects of light reception on circulating estrogen levels in female goldfish,Carassius auratus: Importance of retinal pathways versus the pineal;Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 38 148–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. de Vlaming V L and Olcese J 1981 The pineal and reproduction in fish, amphibians and reptiles. InThe pineal gland: Reproductive effects (ed.) R J Reiter (West palm beach: CRC Press) Chap. 1Google Scholar
  4. Garg S K 1981Experimental studies on the role of pineal organ in the regulation of reproductive cycles in the catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch) Ph.D. thesis, Delhi University, Delhi, pp. 139Google Scholar
  5. Garg S K and Jain S K 1985 Effects of photoperiod and temperature on ovarian activity in the Indian murrel,Channa (Opyocephalus) punctatus (Bloch);Can. J. Zool.63 Google Scholar
  6. Hafeez M A, Wagner H H and Quay W B 1978 Mediation of light induced changes in pineal receptor and supporting cell nuclei and nucleoli in steelhead trout,Salmo gairdneri;Biochem. Photobiol. 28 213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hontela A and Peter R E 1980 Effects of pinealectomy, blinding, and sexual condition on serum gonadotropin levels in the gold-fish;Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 40 168–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Htun-Han M 1977The effects of photoperiod on reproduction in fishes—An annotated bibliography. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food Directorate of Fisheries Research. No. 6. pp. 1–30Google Scholar
  9. Matty A J 1978 Pineal and some pituitary hormone rhythms in fish inRhythmic activity of fishes (ed.) J E Thorpe (London, New York, San Francisco: Academic Press) pp. 21–30Google Scholar
  10. Menaker M and Underwood H 1976 Extraretinal photoreception in birds;Photochem. Photobiol. 23 299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oksche A and Hartwig H G 1979 Pineal sense organs—components of photoneuroendocrine systems;Prog. Brain Res. 52 113–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Saxena P K 1980 Role of eyes as photoperiodic receptors in the catfish,Mystus tengara (Ham);Indian J. Exp. Biol. 18 903–905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sehgal A and Sundararaj B I 1970 Effects of blinding and/or total darkness on ovarian recrudescence or regression during the appropriate periods of the reproductive cycle of the catfish,Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch);J. Interdiscip. Cycle. Res. 1 147–159Google Scholar
  14. Snedecor G W and Cochran W G 1971Statistical methods (Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press)Google Scholar
  15. Sundararaj B I 1981Reproductive physiology of teleost fishes A review of present knowledge and needs for future research ADCP/REP/81/16 pp. 82. FAO Rome.Google Scholar
  16. Underwood H 1979 Extraretinal photoreception. InThe behavioural significance of colour (ed.) E H Burtt (New York: Garland Press) pp. 127–178Google Scholar
  17. Urasaki H 1973 Effect of pinealectomy and photoperiod on ovoposition and gonadal development in the fish,Oryzias latipes;J. Exp. Zool. 185 241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Urasaki H 1974 The function of the pineal gland in the reproduction of the medaka,Oryzias latipes;Bull. Lib. Arts Sci. Course Sch. Med. Nihon. Univ. 2 11–26Google Scholar
  19. Urasaki H 1976 The role of pineal and eyes in the photoperiodic effect on the gonad of the medaka,Oryzias latipes: Chronobiologia 3 228–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Veen T H, Hartwig H G and Müller K 1976 Light dependent motor activity and photonegative behaviour in the eel (Anguilla anguilla L);J. Comp. Physiol. 11 209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vivien-Roels B 1984 Pineal control of reproduction in non-mammalian vertebrates. InThe pineal organ Photobiol-Biochron-Endocrinol, (eds) A Oksche and P Pevet (Elsevier: North-Holland Biomedical Press) pp. 315–334Google Scholar
  22. Vodicnik M J, Olcese J, Delahunty G and de Vlaming V L 1979 The effects of blinding, pinealectomy, and exposure to constant dark conditions on gonadal activity in the female goldfish,Carassius auratus; Environ. Biol. Fish. 4 173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • S K Garg
    • 1
  • S K Jain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyHaryana Agricultural UniversityHissarIndia

Personalised recommendations