Skip to main content
Log in

Screening of mothbeanVigna aconitifolia Jacq varieties against the pulse beetleCallosohruchus chinensis Linn

  • Published:
Proceedings: Animal Sciences

Abstract

The oviposition response and development ofCallosohruchus chinensis Linn was studied on twenty promising varieties of mothbean. Though the beetle oviposited on all varieties, the preference for oviposition was not related to the suitability of seeds for the development. The development of grub was also not dependent on the amount of food consumed. There was significant difference among the varieties in the amount of food consumed per grub and the loss of 100 seed weight. On the basis of food consumed per grub and loss of 100 seed weight as a combined criterion, the varieties are grouped into least susceptible, moderately susceptible and highly susceptible varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dabi R K, Gupta H C and Sharma S K 1978 Relative resistance of some black gram varieties (Phaseolus mungo L.) to the pulse beetle (Callosobruchus maculates Fab.);Bull. Grain Technol. 16 141–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabi R K, Gupta H C and Sharma S K 1979 Relative susceptibility of some cowpea varieties to pulse beetle,Callosobruchus maculates Fabricius;Indian J. Agric. Sci. 49 48–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Girish G K, Singh Karan and Krishnamurthy K1974 Studies on the oviposition and development ofCallosobruchus maculates Fab. on various stored pulses;Bull. Grain Technol. 12 113–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragupathy A and Rathinaswamy R 1970 Studies on comparative susceptibility of seeds of certain red gramCajanus cajan (L.) Mill. sp. varieties to pulse beetle,Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) (Bruchidae: Coleoptera),Madras. Agric. J. 57 106–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy A R and Singh J 1972 Relative resistance of eight important varieties of gramCicer arietinum Linn, to pulse beetleCallosobruchus chinensis Linn;Indian J. Entomol. 34 50–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Satya Vir 1981 Note on the relative susceptibility of different varieties of cowpea toCallosobruchus maculatus Fabricius.Indian J. Agric. Sci. 51 813–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh H and Singh L 1973 Screening of some lentil varieties against pulse beetleCallosobruchus chinensis Linnaeus;Bull. Grain Technol. 11 121–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh J and Talluri B R 1972 Studies on the relative resistance of some varieties of pea (Pisum sativum) toCallosobruchus chinensis (L.);Bull. Grain. Technol. 10 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Odak, S C and Singh Z 1977 Studies on the preference of pulse beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis Linn.) for different hosts;Bull. Grain Technol. 15 320–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadnerkar D W, Kaunsaie P P and Pawar V M 1978 Studies on the preference of pulse beetleCallosobruchus maculates Fab. to some varieties of arhar and gramBull. Grain Technol. 16 122–124

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vir, S. Screening of mothbeanVigna aconitifolia Jacq varieties against the pulse beetleCallosohruchus chinensis Linn. Proc Ani Sci 93, 25–28 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186222

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186222

Keywords

Navigation