Advertisement

Proceedings: Animal Sciences

, Volume 92, Issue 3, pp 231–246 | Cite as

Revision of Cassiduloid genusGongrochanus Kier (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) from South Indian Cretaceous deposits

  • R M Badve
  • S A Aziz
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Revision of the genusGongrochanus Kier from Upper Cretaceous beds of South India has revealed the presence of seven species including its type speciesG. herschelianus (M’Clelland). On the basis of phyllode characters the species have been divided into two informal groups. A biometrical analysis by applying the Bartlett’s andF-test proves the validity of the species described. Coefficients of correlation and regression computed for parameters of length, width and height forG. herschelianus are dependent upon one another; that change of length versus width is more regular than that of length versus height. Occurrence of this genus inHauriceras rembda zone andPachydiscus otacodensis zone of Kallankurichchi and Ottakkovil formations respectively of Ariyalur Group helps in rectifying its geological age which now can be taken as extending from Lower Maestrichtian to Middle Maestrichtian instead of Senonian.

Keywords

Gongrochanus Cassiduloid geological range Maestrichtian Cretaceous deposits Echinoidea 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhattacharya A and Bhattacharya U 1978 Biostratigraphy of the Marine Cretaceous Shelf Sediments of Meghalaya, India, with special reference to its Indo-Pacific faunal affinity;Third Regional Conference on Geology and Mineral Resources of South East Asia Bangkok Thailand 9–24Google Scholar
  2. Das Gupta H C 1920 A short note on the Cretaceous echinoidsCyrtoma M’Clelland;J. Asiat. Soc. Beng. N.S.16 295–300Google Scholar
  3. Das N K, Bora A K and Ghosh D 1981 Studies on the variation inStigmatopygus elatus from the Mahadek formation (Cretaceous) of Meghalaya;Bull. Indian Geol. Assoc. 14 121–132Google Scholar
  4. Dutta S K 1974Cretaceous Tertiary boundary aspects and appraisal of Indian palaeobotany, Birbal Sahni Inst. Palaeobot. Lucknow p. 467Google Scholar
  5. Forbes F 1846 Report on Fossil Invertebrate from South India collected by M Kaye and M Cunliffe;Geol. Trans. Ser. 2, 7 97–174, pl. 7–19Google Scholar
  6. Freneix S 1979 Bivalves du paleocene et de L’eocene de L’Angola Et du Zaire;Annales du Muse e royal de L’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren Belgique, Serie in 8° Sciences geologiques N o 86International Code of Zoological Nomenclature adopted by the XV International Congress of Zoology, International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature; London 1964 (R N Stoli Chairman Editorial Committee)Google Scholar
  7. Kier P M 1962 Revision of the Cassiduloid echinoidsSmithson.Misc. Coll. Paleobiology 144 pp. 262, 44 pl. 180 text figures.Google Scholar
  8. Kier P M 1966Treatise on invertebrate palaeontology Part U. Echinodermata 3 Vol. 2 (ed.) RC Moore (The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press) pp. U 512Google Scholar
  9. Kier P M and Lawson M H 1978 Index of Living and Fossil Echinoids 1924-1970;Contrib. Paleobiol. Smithsonian 34 83Google Scholar
  10. Kossmat F 1897 Cretaceous Fauna of Southern India;Mem. geol. Surv. India Palaeontol. Indica Ser. VIII 3 The Echinodermata IV (3)Google Scholar
  11. Matley C A 1929 The Cretaceous Dinosaurs of the Tiruchirapalli District and the rocks associated with them;Rec. Geol. Surv. India 61 337–349Google Scholar
  12. M’Clelland 1840 OnCyrtoma a new genus of fossil Echinoidea;Calcutta J. Nat. Hist. 1 153–187Google Scholar
  13. Sastry M V A, Rao B R J and Mamgain V D 1968 Biostratigraphic zonation of the upper Cretaceous Formations of Tiruchirapalli Dist. South India;Geol. Soc. India, Bangalore, Mem. 2 10–17Google Scholar
  14. Sastry M V A and Mamgain V D 1971 The Marine Mesozoic Formations of India; A review;Rec. Geol. Surv. India. 101 162–177Google Scholar
  15. Sastry M V A, Mamgain V D, Rao B R J 1972 Ostracod Fauna of the Ariyalur Group (Upper Cretaceous) Tiruchirapalli District, Tamil Nadu;Mem. Geol. Surv. India. Palaeontol. Indica 40 Google Scholar
  16. Spengler E 1923 Contributions to the Palaeontology of Assam;Mem. Geol. Surv. India Palaeontol. Indica N. S. 8 mem. 1 73 p, 4 pl.Google Scholar
  17. Stoliczka F 1873 Cretaceous Fauna of Southern India;Mem. Geol. Surv. India Palaeontol. India Ser. VIII (3) The EchinodermataGoogle Scholar
  18. Woolf C M 1968Principles of biometry (New Jersy: D van Nostrand) pp. 359Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • R M Badve
    • 1
  • S A Aziz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geology and PalaeontologyMaharashtra Association for the Cultivation of Science, Research InstitutePuneIndia

Personalised recommendations