Advertisement

Proceedings: Animal Sciences

, Volume 90, Issue 2, pp 253–260 | Cite as

Fecundity of mahaseerTor putitora (Ham.)

  • S S Pathani
Article

Abstract

Fecundity of Kumaun high altitude mahaseerTor putitora was studied by both gravimetric and volumetric count methods. The fecundity ranged from 7076 to 18525 in total length range from 33·90 to 51·70 cm. It was found that the fecundity has straight line relationships with total length, body weight, ovary length, ovary weight and ovary volume separately. These relationships are expressed by standard formulae separately for both gravimetric and volumetric counts of eggs. The number of eggs increased more with per centimeter of the total length than per gram body weight of the fish. The fecundity increased with higher year classes. It was also observed that the female fish mature after 3 years of age.

Keywords

Fecundity mahaseer Tor putitora high altitude Bhimtal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhargava RMS 1970 The fecundity ofHeteropneustes fossilis (Bloch.);J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 67 583–587Google Scholar
  2. Bhatnagar G K 1964 Spawning and fecundity of Bhakhara reservoir fishes;Indian J. Fish. 11 485–502Google Scholar
  3. Bisht J S and Upadhyay J C 1979 Studies on fecundity of a fresh water Teleost,Barilius Bendelisis Ham. II All India Seminar on Ichthyology Abst. p. 95Google Scholar
  4. Burrows R E 1951 An evaluation of methods of eggs enumeration;Prog. Fish. Cult. 13 79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaturvedi S K 1976 Spawning biology of tor mahseerTor tor (Ham.);J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 73 63–73Google Scholar
  6. Das S M 1964 A study on the fecundity of some fresh water fishes of India with a note on a new concept of comparative fecundity;Ichthyology 3 33–36Google Scholar
  7. Das S M 1967 Studies on the gonads and fecundity of food fishes of Kashmir;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 8 111–120Google Scholar
  8. Desai V R 1973 Studies on fisher and biology ofTor tor (Ham.) from river Narbada;Proc. India Nat. Sci. Acad. 39 228–248Google Scholar
  9. David A 1963 Sexual dimorphism, fecundity and food of the esturine bagridMystus Gulio (Ham.);Proc. Nat. Sci. India 33 385–410Google Scholar
  10. Hodder V M 1963 Fecundity of Grand Bank haddock;J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 20 1465–1488Google Scholar
  11. Islam B N and Talbot G B 1968 Fluvial migration, spawning and fecundity of Atlantic menhodden;Fish. Bull U.S. 63 255–271Google Scholar
  12. Jyoti M K and Malhotra Y R 1972 Studies on the fecundity ofSchizothorax niger Heckel front Dal lake (Kashmir);J. Exp. Biol. 10 74–75Google Scholar
  13. Jhingran V G 1968 Synopsis of biological data onCatla catla (Hamilton); FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 32 p. 100Google Scholar
  14. Kesteven G L 1942 Studies on the biology of Australian mullet:CSIR Bull Aust. 157 1–147Google Scholar
  15. Khan H A and Jhingran V G 1975 Synopsis of biological data on RohuLabeo rohita (Ham.);FAO Fisheries Synopsis No.111 1–100Google Scholar
  16. Lear W H 1970 Fecundity of Greenland Halibut(Reinhardtitus hippoglossoides) in the Newfounland, Labrador area;J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 27 1880–1882Google Scholar
  17. Lehman B A 1953 Fecundity of Hudson river shad;Res. Rep. U.S. Fish Wildlife Ser. 33Google Scholar
  18. Mathur P K 1964 Studies on the maturity and fecundity of theHilsa ilisa (Ham.) in the upper stretches of Ganga;Indian J. Fish. 11 423–448Google Scholar
  19. Nikolsky G V 1963The Ecology of Fishes (London: Academic Press) p. 853Google Scholar
  20. Panek M F and Cofield C R 1978 Fecundity of BluegiU and Warmouth from a South Carolina black water lake;Prog. Fish. Cult. 40 67–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Panneswaran S, Alikunhi K H and Sukumaran K K 1972 Observations on the maturation, fecundity and breeding of common carpCyprinus carpio Linnaeus;Indian J. Fish. 9 110–124Google Scholar
  22. Pathak S C and Jhingran A G 1977 Maturity and fecundity ofLabeo calbasu (Ham.) of Loni reservoir, M.P.;J. Inland Fish. Soc. 9 92–93Google Scholar
  23. Pathani S S 1979Studies on the ecology and biology of Kumaun Mahaseer Tor tor (Ham.) and Tor putitora (Ham.); Ph.D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Naini TalGoogle Scholar
  24. Pathani S S and Das S M 1978 Environmental factors affecting fishes and fisheries of the: Kumaun lakes, Bhimtal and Nainital;Symp. Environ. Biol Abst. p. 17Google Scholar
  25. Qayyum A and Qasim S Z 1964 Studies on the biology of some freshwater fishesOphiocephalus Punctatus Bloch.;J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 51 74–98Google Scholar
  26. Rai B P 1967 Cyclic changes in the ovary ofTor (Barbus) tor (Hamilton);Acta Zool. 48 289–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rao V R 1971 Spawning behaviour and fecundity of the Indian mackerel,Rastrelliger Kanagurta (Cuv.) at Mangalore;Indian J. Fish. 14 171–186Google Scholar
  28. Rao G R 1974 Observations on the growth, maturity and fecundity ofLabeo fimbriatus (Bloch):Indian J. Fish. 21 427–444Google Scholar
  29. Rao C, Nagendra N R and Raman K V K 1979 An analysis of fecundity in the cyprinid. fishPuntius dorsalis (Jardon); All India Seminar on Ichthyology Abst. 11 p.Google Scholar
  30. Rounsefell G A 1957 Fecundity of North American salmonidae;Fish. Bull. U.S. 57 451–468Google Scholar
  31. Sheri A N and Power G 1969 Fecundity of the perch,Perca flavescens Mitchiil in the Bay. of Quinte, lake Ontario;Canadian J. Zool. 47 55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simpson A C 1951 Fecundity of the Plaice;Fish Invest. London 17–27Google Scholar
  33. Stauffer J M 1976 Fecundity of coho salmon(Onchorhynchus kisutch) from the Great Jakes and a comparison with ocean salmon;J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 33 1150–1155Google Scholar
  34. Swamp K 1962 The fecundity of Indian shad,Hilsa ilisha;J. ZooL Soc. 13 108–112Google Scholar
  35. Swee UB and McCrimmon HR 1966 Reproductive biology of the carpCyprinuscarpio L. in lake St. Lawrence Ontario;Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 95 372–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas H S 1893The rod in India (London: W Thacker and Co.)Google Scholar
  37. Varghese T J 1973 The fecundity of the rohu,Labeo rohita (Ham.);Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B77 214–224Google Scholar
  38. Varghese T J 1976 Studies on the fecundity ofCoilia ramcarati (Ham. Buch.);Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. B83 47–54Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Printed in India 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • S S Pathani
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoology Department, Almora Campus CollegeKumaun UniversityAlmoraIndia

Personalised recommendations