Abstract
We tested wetland-restoration management techniques to restore and increase the diversity of aquatic beetle assemblages. Three wetland treatments were examined that included: (i) unplanted surface flow (unplanted SF) wetland, (ii) surface flow (planted SF) wetlands planted with aquatic plants, and (iii) subsurface flow (SSF) wetlands. Species richness of aquatic beetles in SF wetlands was highest in spring, while the abundance was lower in the planted SF wetlands than in the unplanted SF wetland. Planted SF wetlands had a slightly higher diversity of beetles than that of the unplanted SF wetland. The planted and unplanted SF wetlands had similar attributes throughout the rest of the year. In SSF wetlands, beetles were significantly more abundant and species rich in spring than either in the planted or in the unplanted SF wetlands. Beetle diversity in SSF wetlands was higher than that in SF wetlands. During the summer, the differences between treatments disappeared. Our results suggested that: (i) vegetation planting was a successful wetland restoration technique, due to the increased habitat diversity, (ii) subsurface flooding provided fishless temporary waters with favorable breeding conditions for aquatic beetles, thus it was also a useful restoration technique, and (iii) significant seasonal differences in abundance and species richness reflected the characteristic breeding habits of aquatic beetles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Batzer, D. P. and S. A. Wissinger. 1996. Ecology of insect communities in nontidal wetlands. Annual Review of Entomology 41:75–100.
Bosi, G. 2001. Abundance, diversity and seasonal succession of dytiscid and noterid beetles (Coleoptera: Adephaga) in two marshes of the Eastern Po Plain (Italy). Hydrobiologia 459: 1–7.
Brady, V. J., B. J. Cardinale, J. P. Gathman, and T. M. Burton. 2002. Does facilitation of faunal recruitment benefit ecosystem restoration? An experimental study of invertebrate assemblages in wetland mesocosms. Restoration Ecology 10:617–26.
Brown, S. C., K. Smith, and D. Batzer. 1997. Macroinvertebrate responses to wetland restoration in northern New York. Environmental Entomology 26:1016–24.
Collinson, N. H., J. Biggs, A. Corfield, M. J. Hodson, D. Walker, M. Whitfield, and P. J. Williams. 1995. Temporary and permanent ponds: an assessment of the effects of drying out on the conservation value of aquatic macroinvertebrate communities. Biological Conservation 74:125–33.
Csabai, Z. 2000. Vízibogarak kishatározója I. (Coleoptera: Haliplidae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae, Noteridae, Gyrinidae). (Identification manual of aquatic beetles of Hungary I. (Coleoptera: Haliplidae, Hygrobiidae, Dytiscidae, Noteridae, Gyrinidae). Környezetgazdálkodási Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. (In Hungarian).
Csabai, Z. 2003. Vízibogarak kishatározója III. (Identification manual of aquatic beetles of Hungary III. Supplement Band). Környezetgazdálkodási Intézet, Budapest. (In Hungarian)
Csabai, Z., Z. Gidó, and G. Szél. 2002. Vízibogarak kishatározója II. (Coleoptera: Georissidae, Spercheidae, Hydrochidae, Helophoridae, Hydrophilidae). (Identification manual of aquatic beetles of Hungary II. (Coleoptera: Georissidae, Spercheidae, Hydrochidae, Helophoridae, Hydrophilidae). Környezetgazdá lkodási Intézet, Budapest, Hungary. (In Hungarian)
Cuppen, I. 1986. The influence of acidity and chlorinity on the distribution ofHydroporus species (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) in the Netherlands. Entomologica Basiliensia 11:327–36.
Davy-Bowker, J. 2002. A mark and recapture study of water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in a group of semi-permanent and temporary ponds. Aquatic Ecology 36:435–46.
De Szalay, F. and V. Resh. 2000. Factors influencing macroinvertebrate colonization of seasonal wetlands: responses to emergent plant cover. Freshwater Biology 45:295–308.
Fairchild, G. W., A. M. Faulds, and J. F. Matta. 2000. Beetle assemblages in ponds: effects of habitat and site age. Freshwater Biology 44:523–34.
Fairchild, G. W., J. Cruz, A. M. Faulds, A. E. Z. Short, and J. F. Matta. 2003. Microhabitat and landscape influences on aquatic beetle assemblages in a cluster of temporary and permanent ponds. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 22:224–40.
Fernando, C. and D. Galbraith. 1973. Seasonality and dynamics of aquatic insects colonizing small habitats. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fü r Limnologie 18:1564–1575.
Flinn, M. B. 2005. Macroinvertebrate and zooplankton responses to emergent plant production in upper Mississippi River floodplain wetlands. Archiv fü r Hydrobiologie 162:187–10.
Foster, G. 1987. The use of Coleoptera records in assessing the conservation status of wetlands. p. 8–18.In M. Luff (ed.) The Use of Invertebrate Community Data in Environmental Assessment. University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Galewski, K. 1971. A study on morphobiotic adaptations of European species of the Dytiscidae (Coleoptera). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 41:487–702.
Gregg, W. W. and F. L. Rose. 1985. Influences of aquatic macrophytes on invertebrate community structure, guild structure, and microdistribution in streams. Hydrobiologia 128:45–56.
Hebauer, F. 1986. Kä fer als Bioindikatoren dargestellt am Ökosystem Bergbach. Laufener Seminarbeitrage: Ausgewä hlte Referate zum Arteschutz 7:55–65.
Heino, J. 2000. Lentic macroinvertebrate assemblage structure along gradients in spatial heterogeneity, habitat size and water chemistry. Hydrobiologia 418:229–42.
Hornung, J. P. and A. L. Foote. 2006. Aquatic invertebrate responses to fish presence and vegetation complexity in western boreal wetlands, with implications for waterbird productivity. Wetlands 26:1–12.
ITRC (The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council Wetlands Team). 2003. Technical and Regulatory Guidance Document for Constructed Treatment Wetlands. [WWW document]. URL http://www.itrcweb.org.
Keiper, J. B. and W. E. Walton. 2002. Effects of three vegetation management strategies on shore-flies (Diptera: Ephydridae) in newly constructed treatment wetlands. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 95:570–76.
Kiss, A. 2007. Factors affecting spatial and temporal distribution of Ostracoda assemblages in different macrophyte habitats of a shallow lake (Lake Feher, Hungary). Hydrobiologia 585:89–98.
Kostecke, R. M., L. M. Smith, and H. M. Hands. 2005. Macroinvertebrate response to cattail management at Cheyenne Bottoms, Kansas, USA. Wetlands 25:758–63.
Kurashov, E. A., I. V. Telesh, V. E. Panov, N. V. Usenko, and M. A. Rychkova. 1996. Invertebrate communities associated with macrophytes in Lake Ladoga. Effects of environmental factors. Hydrobiologia 322:49–55.
Lá jer, K. 1998. Bevezetés a magyarországi lápok vegetáció ökológiájába. (Vegetation ecology of the Hungarian fens). Tilia 6:84–238. (In Hungarian).
Legendre, P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier Science, BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lundkvist, E., J. Landin, and P. Milberg. 2001. Diving beetle (Dytiscidae) assemblages along environmental gradients in an agricultural landscape in Southeastern Sweden. Wetlands 21:48–58.
Margóczi, K., G. Takács, A. Pellinger, and L. Kárpáti. 2002. Wetland reconstruction in Hanság area (Hungary). Restoration Newsletter 15:14–15.
Merkl, O. 2002. The species of 54 beetle families (Coleoptera) from the Fertő-Hanság National Park and adjacent areas, Western Hungary. p. 429–472.In S. Mahunka (ed.) The Fauna of the Fertő-Hanság National Park. The Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary.
Nicolet, P., J. Biggs, G. Fox, M. J. Hodson, C. Reynolds, M. Whitfield, and P. Williams. 2004. The wetland plant and macroinvertebrate assemblages of temporary ponds in England and Wales. Biological Conservation 120:261–78.
Oertli, B. D., A. Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge, A. Lehmann, and J. Lachavanne. 2005. PLOCH: a standardized method for sampling and assessing the biodiversity in ponds. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15:665–79.
Painter, D. 1999. Macroinvertebrate distribution and the conservation value of aquatic Coleoptera, Mollusca and Odonata in the ditches of traditionally managed and grazing fen at Wicken Fen, UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 36:33–48.
Quinn, G. P., T. J. Hillman, and R. Cook. 2000. The response of macroinvertebrates to inundation in floodplain wetlands: a possible effect of river regulation. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 16:469–78.
Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2004. The Ramsar Convention Manual: a Guide to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), 3rd ed. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland.
R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical-Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document]. URL http:// www.R-project.org.
Ribera, I. and G. Foster. 1992. Uso de coleopteros acuaticos como indicatores biologicos (Coleoptera). (Use of aquatic Coleoptera as biological indicators). Elytron 6:61–75. (In Spanish).
Sánchez-Fernández, D., P. Abellán, A. Mellado, J. Velasco, and A. Millán. 2006. Are water beetles good indicators of biodiversity in Mediterranean aquatic ecosystems? The case of the Segura river basin (SE Spain). Biodiversity and Conservation 15:4507–20.
Schaeflein, H. 1989. Dritter Beitrag zur Dytiscidenfauna Mitteleuropas (Coleoptera) mit ökologischen und nomenklaturischen Anmerkungen. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde (Ser. A) 430:1–39.
Statistica. 1995. Statistica for Windows 5.0. (1995). Computer Program Manual. StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA.
Strayer, D. L. and H. Malcolm. 2007. Submersed vegetation as habitat for invertebrates in the Hudson River estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 30:253–64.
Streever, W. J., D. L. Evans, C. M. Keenan, and T. L. Crisman. 1995. Chironomidae (Diptera) and vegetation in a created wetland and implications for sampling. Wetlands 13:229–36.
Stewart, T. W. and J. A. Downing. 2008. Macroinvertebrate communities and environmental conditions in recently constructed wetlands. Wetlands 28:141–50.
Taká cs, G., K. Margóczi, and Z. Bátori. 2007. Vegetációvá ltozá sok egy nagy kiterjedésű hansá gi vizes élőhely-rekonstrukción. (Vegetation changes in a largeness wetland reconstruction in Hansá g). Természetvédelmi Közlemények 13:269–80. (In Hungarian).
Tarr, T., M. Baber, and K. Babitt. 2005. Macroinvertebrate community structure across a wetland hydroperiod gradient in southern New Hampshire, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13:321–34.
Timmermann, T., K. Margóczi, G. Takács, and K. Vegelin. 2006. Restoration of peat-forming vegetation by rewetting speciespoor fen grasslands. Applied Vegetation Science 9:241–250.
Tóthmérész, B. 1998. On the characterization of scale-dependent diversity. Abstracta Botanica 22:149–56.
VanDuinen, G. A., A. J. Dees, and H. Esselink. 2004. Importance of permanent and temporary water bodies for aquatic beetles in the raised bog remnant Wierdense Veld. Proceedings Experimental and Applied Entomology (NEV) 15:15–20.
Verberk, W. C. E. P., G. A. van Duinen, A. M. T. Brock, R. S. E. W. Leuven, H. Siepel, P. F. M. Verdonschot, G. van der Velde, and H. Esselink. 2006. Importance of landscape heterogeneity for the conservation of aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in bog landscapes. Journal of Nature Conservation 14:78–90.
Wellborn, G. A., D. K. Skelly, and E. E. Werner. 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:337–63.
Wood, P. J., M. T. Greenwood, and M. D. Agnew. 2003. Pond biodiversity and habitat loss in the UK. Area 35:206–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molnár, Á., Csabai, Z. & Tóthmérész, B. Influence of flooding and vegetation patterns on aquatic beetle diversity in a constructed wetland complex. Wetlands 29, 1214–1223 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185922
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03185922