Advertisement

Il Nuovo Cimento A (1971-1996)

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 95–104 | Cite as

Semileptonic B-decay as a test of CKM unitarity

  • L. T. Handoko
Article

Summary

I point out that B → Xq l+ l- decays (q = s, d) are sensitive probes of possible violation of CKM unitarity. I compute the decay rates and asymmetries in a minimal extension of the Standard Model containing an additional isosinglet charge (-1/3) quark, which leads to a deviation from CKM unitarity. It is shown that even for small mixing ratios |zqb/(Vtq*Vtb)|O(10-2), the contribution of the tree-levelZ-FCNC appearing in the model should change the rates and asymmetries significantly. Especially theCP asymmetry, A CP (B → Xs l+ l-), can be enhanced to be few percents, while in the standard model the size is less thanO(1023). On the other hand, A CP (B → Xs l+) is not altered so much. Constraints for the mixing ratios are extracted from the experiments of B→Xs ΰ for q = s and B0d-B0d mixing for q = d under the natural assumption that the couplings of the tree-level Zff are almost unity,i.e.zαα ∼ 1.

PACS 12.15.Hh

Determination of Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements 

PACS 12.60.Cn

Extensions of electroweak gauge sector 

PACS 13.20.He

Decays of bottom mesons 

PACS 13.30.Ce

Leptonic and semileptonic decays 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Branco G. C. andLavoura L.,Nucl. Phys. B,278 (1986) 738;Lavoura L. andSilva J. P.,Phys. Rev. D,47 (1993) 2046;Barger V.,Berger M. S. andPhilips R. J. N.,Phys. Rev. D,52 (1995) 1663.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Hewett J. L. andRizzo T. G.,Phys. Rep.,183 (1989) 193;Bento L.,Branco G. C. andParada P. A.,Phys. Lett.,267 (1991) 95.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Branco G. C., Morozumi T., Parada P. A. andRebelo M. N.,Phys. Rev. D,48 (1993) 1167.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bhattacharyya G., Branco G. C. andChoudhury D.,Phys. Lett. B,336 (1994) 487;Erratum,340 (1994) 266;Handoko L. T. andMorozumi T.,Mod. Phys. Lett. A,10 (1995) 309.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Grinstein B., Savage M. J. andWise M. B.,Nucl. Phys. B,319 (1989) 271;Grigjanis R.,O’Donnel P. J.,Sutherland M. andNavelet H.,Phys. Lett. B,223 (1989) 239.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Jezabek andKühn J. H.,Nucl. Phys. B,320 (1989) 20;Misiak M.,Nucl. Phys. B,393 (1993) 23;Erratum,439 (1995) 461;Buras A. J. andMünz M.,Phys. Rev. D,52 (1995) 186.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Handoko L. T., submitted toPhys. Rev. D, hep-ph/9707222 (1997).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    CLEO Collaboration (Alam M. S. et.al.),Phys. Rev. Lett.,74 (1995) 2885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Krüger F. andSehgal L. M.,Phys. Rev. D,55 (1997) 2799.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Ali A., Mannel T. andMorozumi T.,Phys. Lett. B,373 (1991) 505.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hewett J. L.,Phys. Rev. D,53 (1996) 4964;Krüger F. andSehgal L. M.,Phys. Lett. B,380 (1996) 199.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Particle Data Group,Phys. Rev. D,54 (1996) 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fisica 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsHiroshima UniversityHigashi HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations