Advertisement

KSME International Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 395–402 | Cite as

Analysis of Hagen-Poiseuille flow using SPH

  • Moon Wonjoo
  • You Sukbeom
  • Min Oakkey
Thermal Engineering · Fluid Engineering · Energy and Power Engineering

Abstract

This paper shows how to formulate the transient analysis of 2-dimensional Hagen-Poiseuille flow using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Treatments of viscosity, particle approximation and boundary conditions are explained. Numerical tests are calculated to examine effects caused by the number of particles, the number of particles per smoothing length, artificial viscosity and time increments for 2-dimensional Hagen-Poiseuille flow. Artificial viscosity for reducing the numerical instability directly affects the velocity of the flow, though effects of the other parameters do not produce as much effect as artificial viscosity. Numerical solutions using SPH show close agreement with the exact ones for the model flow, but SPH parameter must be chosen carefully. Numerical solutions indicate that SPH is also an effective method for the analysis of 2-dimensional Hagen-Poiseuille flow.

Key Words

SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) Kernel Function Smoothing Length Imaginary Particle Particle Approximation Artificial Viscosity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bonet, J. and Kulasegram, S., 2000, “Correction and Stabilization of Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Methods with Applications in Metal Forming Simulations,”Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., Vol. 47, pp. 1189–1214.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Libersky, L. D., Petschek, A. G., Carney, T. C., Hipp, J. R. and Allahdadi, F. A., 1993, “High Strain Lagrangian Hydrodynamics: A Three-Dimensional Response,”J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 109, pp. 67–75.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lucy, L. B., 1997, “A Numerical Approach to the Testing of the Fission Hypothesis,”Astron. J., Vol. 82, pp. 1013–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Min, O., Lee, J., Kim, K., Park, H., 1996, “An Application of Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics in Analysis of Dynamic Elasto-Plastic Deformation,”Proc. of 2nd ISIE ’96, pp. 392–397.Google Scholar
  5. Min, O., Lee, J., Kim, K., and Lee, S., 2000, “A Contact Algorithm in the Low Velocity Impact Simulation with SPH,”KSME Int. J., Vol. 114, pp. 705–714Google Scholar
  6. Monaghan, J. J. and Gingold, R. A., 1983, “Shock Simulation by the Particle method SPH,”J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 52, pp. 374–389.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Monaghan, J. J. and Kocharyan, A., 1994, “SPH simulation of multi-phase flow,”J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 87, pp. 225–235.Google Scholar
  8. Morris, J. P., Fox, P. J. and Yi, Z., 1997, “Modeling Low Reynolds Number Incompressible Flow Using SPH,”J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 136, pp. 214–226.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morris, J. P., 2000, “Simulating Surface Tension with Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics,”Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids., Vol. 33, pp. 333–353.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Petschek, A. G. and Libersky, L. D., 1993, “Cylindrical Smoothed Particle Hydro-dynamics,”J. Comput. Phys., Vol. 109, pp. 76–83.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Randles, P. W. and Libersky, L. D., 1996, “Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Some Recent Improvements and Applications,”Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., Vol. 139, pp. 375–408.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Takeda, H., Miyama, S. M. and Sekiya, M., 1994, “Numerical Simulation of Viscous Flow By Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics,”Prog. Theor. Phys., Vol. 92, pp. 939–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (KSME) 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Team of Design for Structural Integrity, Division of Electrical and Mechanical EngineeringYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Product Design TeamSamsung SDI Co., LtdSuwon, Kyunggi-doKorea
  3. 3.Division of Electrical and Mechanical EngineeringYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations