Advertisement

Chinese Science Bulletin

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 27–30 | Cite as

Fuzzy cluster analysis of the provenance of ancient Yaozhou porcelain body

  • Guoxia Li
  • Weijuan Zhao
  • Rongwu Li
  • Jianzhong Xie
  • Songlin Feng
  • Dongyu Fan
  • Ying Zhang
  • Zhifang Cai
  • Zhenxi Zhuo
  • Zhengyao Gao
Reports

Abstract

The technique of neutron activation analysis (NAA) has been employed to measure the content of 29 kinds of elements in the sample of Yaozhou porcelain bodies. Then a fuzzy cluster analysis has been conducted to the NAA data and a diagram of the dynamic fuzzy cluster analysis has been achieved. The results indicate that the batch of ancient Yaozhou porcelain bodies, which were of different overglaze color and were produced by different kilns during a period of over 800 years from the Tang Dynasty (618–907 A.D.) to the Yuan Dynasty (1271–1368 A.D.), has shared a stable and concentrated raw material source. Provenances of porcelain bodies from different times, though having their specific independence, enjoy a close relationship and are not far from one another. Provenances of porcelain bodies made during the Tang Dynasty and the Five Dynasties (907–960 A.D.) are found to be closer to one another, while those of the Song (960–1279 A.D.) and the Jin Dynasty (1115–1234 A.D.) are comparatively concentrated in certain areas and are different from those of the Tang Dynasty. Both the tri-colored glazed pottery made in Yaozhou kilns during the Tang Dynasty and the Yaozhou porcelain bodies of the Tang period are from the same provenance.

Keywords

ancient Yaozhou porcelain body sources of raw material neutron activation analysis fuzzy cluster analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhuo Zhenxi, Du Baoren, Kiln Sites of Huangbao in Tang Dynasty (in Chinese), Beijing Historical Object Press, 1990, 1–28.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhuo Zhenxi, Du Baoren, Kiln Sites of Huangbao in Five Dynasties (in Chinese), Beijing Historical Object Press, 1993, 1–15.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhuo Zhenxi, Du Baoren, Kiln Sites of Yaozhou in Song Dynasty (in Chinese), Beijing Historical Object Press, 1990, 1–26.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang Fen, Chen Shiping, Sun Hongwei, Research on Yaozhou celadon in the Five Dynasties Period, Proceedings of 1999 International Symposium on Ancient Ceramics (ed. Guo Jingkun) (in Chinese), Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 1999, 55–62.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li Shi, Qin Ganging, Modern Experiment Technology Applied in Archaeology, Beijing Science Press, 1991, 309–312.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li Rongwu, Yang, Lei, Li Guoxia et al., Neutron activation analysis and Mössbauer spectroscopy research on coloring mechanism of Chinese Ru porcelain, Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47(14): 1163.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao Weijuan, Xu Aijun, Li Rongwuo et al., Microelement analysis of sources of raw material of terracotta warriors and horses of Qin’s Mausoleum in pits Nos. 1 and 2, Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47(16): 1137.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li Guoxia, Zhao Weijuan, Gao Zhengyao, et al., A general intellectualized fuzzy cluster analysis system, Microelectronics & Computer (in Chinese), 2000, 17(2): 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science in China Press 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guoxia Li
    • 1
  • Weijuan Zhao
    • 1
  • Rongwu Li
    • 2
  • Jianzhong Xie
    • 1
  • Songlin Feng
    • 3
  • Dongyu Fan
    • 3
  • Ying Zhang
    • 3
  • Zhifang Cai
    • 3
  • Zhenxi Zhuo
    • 4
  • Zhengyao Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Physical EngineeringZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  3. 3.High Energy Physics InstituteThe Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Archaeology Research InstituteShanxi ProvinceXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations