Abstract
This report aimed to measure the impact of a unique professional development program entitled Project ASTER III (Active Science Teaching Encourages Reform) on teachers’ self-efficacy and perceptions about inquiry-based science teaching. Project ASTER III enabled teachers to explore inquiry-based science teaching through exhibit-based hands-on/ minds-on investigations at a science museum and to develop a science curriculum aligned with museum exhibits and state and national science education standards. Quantitative data indicated that teacher beliefs were positively and significantly impacted by the professional development program and confirmed that programs like ASTER III are effective but need to be provided on a continuous basis to reinforce these beliefs in the teachers. Finally, three themes emerged from the analysis of the qualitative data from the participant journals: (1) impact on teacher understanding of inquiry, (2) increased confidence about science teaching, and (3) benefits of collaboration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.),Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bandura, A. (1981). Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell & L. Ross (Eds.),Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 200–239). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Feeman.
Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsides: Reshaping the sciences of the future.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(4), 401–416.
Bybee, R. (1997).Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Czerniak, C. M., & Chiarelott, L. (1990). Teacher education for effective science instruction—A social cognitive perspective.Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 49–58.
Czerniak, C. M., & Shriver, M. (1994). An examination of pre-service science teachers’ beliefs and behaviors as related to self-efficacy.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5, 77–86.
Duran, E., & Ballone-Duran, L. (2005). Project ASTER: A model staff development program and its impact on early childhood teachers’ self-efficacy.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(2), 1–12.
Enochs, L. G., Posnanski, T., Riggs, I. M., & Shroyer, M. G. (1997, January).A review of science teaching efficacy research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teachers of Science, Cincinnati, OH.
Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (1997). School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact.Curator, 40, 211–218.
Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums.Science Education, 81, 793–799.
Kisiel, J. (2006). Making field trips work: Strategies for creating an effective learning experience.The Science Teacher, 72(10), 46–48.
Levitt, K. E. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science.Science Education, 86, 1–22.
Lumpe, A. T., Czerniak, C. M., Haney, J. J., & Beltyukova, S. (2004).Teacher beliefs: Impact of professional development and influence on student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teachers of Science, Nashville, TN.
Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 275–292.
McComas, W. F. (2006). Science teaching beyond the classroom: The role and nature of informal learning environments.The Science Teacher, 72(10), 26–30.
Morrell, P. D. (2003). Cognitive impact of a grade school field trip.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 27–34.
Moseley, C., Reinke, K., & Bookout, V. (2003). The effect of teaching outdoor environmental education on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 1–13.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996).National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1999).NSTA position statement on informal science education. Retrieved September 29, 2009, from nsta.org/ positionstatement&psid=13.
Plourde, L. A. (2002). The influence of student teaching on pre-service elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs.Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(4), 245–253.
Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a field trip: Science programmes for elementary school groups at museums.International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 505–519.
Ramey-Gassert, L., Shroyer, G. M., & Staver, J. (1996). A qualitative study of factors influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers.Science Education, 80(3), 283–315.
Ramey-Gassert, L., Walberg III, H. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Reexamining connections: Museums as science learning environments.Science Education, 78, 345–363.
Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institute.
Rasch, G. (1980).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Rennie, L., & McClafferty, T. (1995). Using visits to interactive science and technology centers, museums, aquaria, and zoos to promote learning in science.Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(4), 175–185.
Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teachers’ science teaching efficacy belief instrument.Science Education, 74, 625–637.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duran, E., Ballone-Duran, L., Haney, J. et al. The impact of a professional development program integrating informal science education on early childhood teachers’ self-efficacy and beliefs about inquiry-based science teaching. J Elem Sci Edu 21, 53–70 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182357
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03182357