Force field for planar vibrations of urea: use of CNDO/Force MO calculations

  • A Annamalai
  • M Kanakavel
  • Surjit Singh
Physical and Theoretical


Symmetry force field calculations have been performed for the planar vibrations of urea using CNDO/Force method. The CNDO/Force calculations predict well the signs and the magnitudes of bending and interaction force constants; the stretching force constants are found to be higher in magnitude. The bending and interaction constants obtained from these calculations and the stretching force constants obtained from the literature are considered for the initial force field. Using the observed frequencies for urea and its isotopic analogues, urea-D4, urea-15N2, urea-15N2D4 and urea-18O in the solid as well as in the solution phases, the force field is refined by carrying out iterations over the diagonal force constants. In the final stages of the refinement iterations are carried out over all the force constants keeping the signs of the interaction constants unchanged. It is found that the agreement between the calculated and the observed frequencies is excellent. The final force fields in terms of symmetry as well as redundancy free internal valence coordinates are reported. On the basis of the potential energy distribution the vibrational assignments are discussed.


CNDO/Force calculation force field of urea normal coordinate analysis of urea optimum geometry of urea 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams D M and Churchill R G 1970J. Chem. Soc. A 697Google Scholar
  2. Arenas J and Paralleda R 1971J. Mol. Struct. 10 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duncan J L 1971Spectrochim. Acta A27 1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duncan J L 1973Chem. Phys. Lett. 23 597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hadzi D, Kidric J, Khezevic Z V and Barlic B 1976Spectrochim. Acta A32 693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirakawa A Y, Tsuboi M and Shimanouchi T 1972J. Chem. Phys. 57 1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IUPAC 1977Appl. Spectrosc. 31 569Google Scholar
  8. Kanakavel M Chandrasekhar J, Subramanian S and Singh S 1976Theoret. Chim. Acta 43 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kanakavel M 1976Vibrational analysis and evaluation of force fields of polyatomic molecules, Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Institute of Techology, MadrasGoogle Scholar
  10. Laulicht I, Pinchas S, Petreanu E and Samuel D 1965Spectrochim. Acta 21 1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mallinson P D, McKean D C, Holloway J H and Oxton I A 1975Spectrochim. Acta A31 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mills I M 1963Spectrochim. Acta 19 1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pople J A and Beveridge D L 1970 Approximate Molecular Orbital Theory, (New York: McGraw-Hill)Google Scholar
  14. Pulay P and Torok F 1973Mol. Phys. 25 1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schactschneider J H 1964 Technical Reports No. 57-65, Shell Development Co., California,Google Scholar
  16. Shteinberg B Ya, Mushkim Yu I and Finkelshtein A I 1972Opt. Spectrosc. 33 589Google Scholar
  17. Stewart J E 1957J. Chem. Phys. 26 248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Usha Bai P and Venkata Ramiah K 1973Indian J. Pure. Appl. Phys. 11 171Google Scholar
  19. Waldron R D and Badger R M 1957J. Chem. Phys. 26 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Worsham J E, Levy H A and Peterson S W 1957Acta Crystallogr. 10 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yamaguchi A, Miyazawa T, Shimanouchi T and Mizushima S 1957Spectrochim. Acta 10 170CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • A Annamalai
    • 1
  • M Kanakavel
    • 1
  • Surjit Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Structural Chemistry Group, Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of TechnologyMadras

Personalised recommendations