Lead attenuation characteristics models

Scientific Note


Lead attenuation characteristic curves are often consulted in premises radiation shielding assessments employing the non-destructive testing (NDT) method. This study developed lead attenuation characteristics mathematical models for the radionuclide Co-57. These models take into account the statistical variation of the attenuation characteristics. The results are a set of equations that a NDT assessor can use to predict the range of transmission factors for the NDT measurement or, using the inverse functions, to gauge the lead equivalence (with the associated uncertainty) of a radiation barrier. This study showed that the combined effect of types of statistical variations can form an uncertainty region on the transmission characteristics such that the relative uncertainty decreases for values of lead mass per unit area up to approximately 20kg/m2 and 15 kg/m2 for the Ludlum 18 and Ludlum 2241–2 survey meters respectively but thereafter increases.

Key words

lead attenuation non-destructive testing transmission factor 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kelly, John P. and Trout, E. Dale,Broad-Beam Attenuation in Lead for X Rays from 50 to 300kVp, Radiology, 104:171–175, July 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dixon, R. L. and Simpkin, D. J.,Primary Shielding Barriers for Diagnostic X-ray Facilities: A New Model, Health Physics, 74, 181–189, 1998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 13.
    Simpkin, D. J. and Dixon, R. L.,Secondary Shielding Barriers for Diagnostic X-ray Facilities: Scatter and Leakage Revisited, Health Physics, 74, 350–365, 1998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radiation Shielding for Diagnostic X-rays, Ed. D. G. Sutton and J. R. Williams, The British Institute of Radiology, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Structural Shielding Design for Medical X-Ray Imaging Facilities, NCRP Report 147, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simpkin, Douglas J.,Transmission Data for Shielding Diagnostic X-Ray Facilities, Health Physics, 68(5), 704–9, 1995.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schick, D. K., Casey, R. N., Sim, L. H. and Siddle, K. J.,Corrosion of lead shielding in a radiology department, Australasian Radiology, 43(1), 47–51, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Westall, D. J. and Rubendra, R.,Inspection of Radiation Shielding Installed at Diagnostic Radiology Facilities. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine. 11(4), 147–9, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Westall, D. J.,Development of a System for Checking Radiation Shielding Installed at Diagnostic X-ray Facilities, Radiation Protection in Australia, 5, 131–133, 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knoll, G. F.,Radiation Detection and Measurement, 3rd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, p. 70 and 73, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ludlum Model 18 Analyzer — Serial No. 95384 and Succeeding Serial Numbers, Ludlum Measurements, Inc., June 1992.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ludlum Model 2241–2 Survey Meter — Serial No. 237627 and Succeeding Serial Numbers, Ludlum Measurements, Inc., July 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kreyszig, E.,Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 8th Ed., John Wiley and Sons, p. 1116, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilton Pereira da Silva and Cleide Pereira da SilvaLabFit V., www.labfit.net.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Technology ServicesFortitude ValleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations