Annals of Microbiology

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 657–662 | Cite as

Inhibitory mechanisms by chlorobenzoate mixtures in chlorobenzoate-degrading microorganisms

  • Grazia Baggi
  • Silvana Bernasconi
  • Maurizio Zangrossi
Ecological and Environmental Microbiology Original Articles


]A microbial consortium selected on 2-chlorobenzoate was shown to be able to also utilise 4-chlorobenzoate and 2,5-dichlorobenzoate as sole carbon source. The consortium adapted to grow on 4-chlorobenzoate, degraded the carbon sourcevia protocatechuate, whereas the same consortium degraded 2-chlorobenzoate and 2,5-dichlorobenzoate via 1,2- or 1,6-dioxygenation of the chlorinated ring. Moreover, no significant effects on the microbial growth due to the presence of chlorobenzoate mixtures were observed when 4-chlorobenzoate was the carbon source. Instead, when mete-substituted chlorobenzoates were added as co-substrates to 2,5-dichlorobenzoate, the growth of the consortium was totally inhibited, just as when the culture utilised for growth 2-chlorobenzoate. Uptake experiments with 2-chlorobenzoate-grown resting cells showed that 3-chlorobenzoate, 2,3-dichlorobenzoate and 2,3,5-trichlorobenzoate competed with 2-chlorobenzoate, entering the resting cells both preferentially and faster than the growth substrate, that was also impeded to enter. Also 3,4-dichlo-robenzoate and 3,5-dichlorobenzoate hindered the uptake of the growth substrate (2-chlorobenzoate and 2,5-dichlorobenzoate, respectively), but they did not enter themselves the cells. Finally, 3,5-dichlorobenzoate neither entered the 4-chlorobenzoate-grown cells nor hindered 4-chlorobenzoate uptake. The relationships between growth inhibiting effects and chlorosubstituent position on the aromatic ring of the chlorobenzoates supplied as co-substrates are discussed.

Key words

microbial consortium growth inhibition chlorobenzoate mixtures uptake competition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adriaens P., Focht D.D. (1991). Evidence for inhibitory substrate interactions during cometabolism of 3,4-dichlorobenzoate byAcinetobacter sp. strain 4-CB1. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 85: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baggi G. (2000) Ecological implications of synergistic and antagonistic interactions among growth and non growth analogs present in mixture. Ann. Microbiol., 50: 103–115.Google Scholar
  3. Baggi G., Zangrossi M. (1995). Inhibition bymeta-substituted dichlorobenzoates inAlcaligenesdenitrificans which grows on 4-chlorobenzoate. Ann. Microbiol., 45: 185–189.Google Scholar
  4. Baggi G., Zangrossi M. (1999). Degradation of chlorobenzoates in soil suspensions by indigenous populations and specialized organism: interaction between growth and non-growth substrates. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 29: 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baggi G., Zangrossi M. (2001). Assessment of the biodegradative potential versus chlorobenzoates as single or mixed compounds in a stable microbial consortium. Ann. Microbiol., 51: 179–188.Google Scholar
  6. Baggi G., Bernasconi S., Zangrossi M. (2005). 3-Chloro-, 2,3- and 3,5-dichlorobenzoate co-metabolism in a 2-chlorobenzoate-degrading consortium. Biodegradation, 16: 275–282.)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Baggi G., Bernasconi S., Zangrossi M., Cavalca L, Andreoni V. (2008). Co-metabolism of di- and tri-chlorobenzoates in a 2-chlorobenzoate-degrading bacterial culture: Effect of the position and number of halo-substituents. Int. Biodet. Biodegr, 62: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouchez M., Blanchet D., Vandecasteele J.-P. (1995). Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by pure strains and by defined strain associations: inhibition phenomena and cometabolism. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 43: 156–164.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Corbella M.E., Garrido-Pertierra A., Puyet A. (2001). Induction of the halobenzoate catabolic pathway and cometabolism of ortho-chlorobenzoates inPseudomonas aeruginosa 142 grown on glucose-supplemented medium. Biodegradation, 12: 149–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hernandez B.S., Higson, F.K., Kondrat R., Focht D.D. (1991). Metabolism of and inhibition by chlorobenzoates inPseudomonas putida P111. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 57: 3361–3366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Miguez C.B., Greer C.W., Ingram J.M., MacLeod R.A. (1995). Uptake of benzoic acid and chloro-substituted benzoic acids byAlcaligenes denitrificans BRI 3010 and BRI 6011. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61: 4152–4159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith M.R., Ewing M., Ratledge C. (1991). The interactions of various aromatic substrates degraded byPseudomonas sp. NCIB 10643: synergistic inhibition of growth by two compounds that serve as growth substrates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 34: 536–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stratford J., Wright M.A., Reineke W., Mokross H., Havel J., Knowles C.J., Robinson G.K. (1996). Influence of chlorobenzoates on the utilisation of chlorobiphenyls and chlorobenzoate mixtures by chlorobiphenyl/ chlorobenzoate-mineralising hybrid bacterial strains. Arch. Microbiol., 165: 213–218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Stringfellow W.T., Aitken M.D. (1995). Competitive metabolism of naphthalene, metylnaphthalenes, and fluorene by phenanthrene-degrading Pseudomonads. Appl. Environm. Microbiol., 61: 357–362.Google Scholar
  15. Weissenfeis W.D., Beyer M., Klein J. (1990). Degradation of phenanthrene, fluorene and fluoranthene by pure bacterial cultures. Appl. Microbiol.Biotechnol., 32: 479–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© University of Milan and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grazia Baggi
    • 1
  • Silvana Bernasconi
    • 2
  • Maurizio Zangrossi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Alimentan e MicrobiologicheUniversitá degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Chimica Organica e IndustrialeUniversitá degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations