Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competing risk problems with no independence assumed: Does it make a difference?

  • Published:
Journal of the Italian Statistical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In survival analysis the Kaplan Meier estimator (Kaplan and Meier, 1958) is widely used to provide information about the covariates effect on a response. Whenever a competing risks framework is given, the Kaplan Meier estimator may overstimate or underestimate the effect of the covariates (Di Serio, 1997) due to the unrealistic underlying independence assumptions. The cumulative incidence curve (CIC) is suggested as alternative estimator in these frameworks. Results deriving from the use of the CIC applied to esophageal cancer data show how this alternative tool is an intuitive as the Kaplan Meier estimator and does not required any further statistical assumptions for identifiability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalen, O. O. (1975),Statistical Inference for a family of counting processes, Ph. D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. K., Borgan, O., Gill, R. D. andKeiding, N. (1993),Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A. P. andGhosh, J. K. (1980), Identifiability of distributions under competing risks and complementary risks model,Comm. Statist.-Theor. Meth., A9 (14), 1515–1525.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S. C., Fine, P. andWei, L. J. (1997), Prediction of Cumulative Incidence Function under the Proportional Hazard Mosel,mimeo.

  • Cox, D. R. (1959), The analysis of exponentially distributed life times with two types offailure.J. Royal Statist. Soc., B, 21, 411–421.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. andOakes, D. (1984),Analysis of Survival Data. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Serio, C. (1997), The Protective Impact of a Covariate on Competing Failures with an Example from a Bone Marrow Transplantation Study.Lifetime Data Analysis, 3, 99–112.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Di Serio, C., Marks, L. andParmigiani, G. (1999), The effect of Surgery in Esophageal Cancer.ISDS discussion series 99-09, Duke University.

  • Doob, J. L. (1953),Stochastic Processes. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elandt-Johnson, R. C. andJohnson, N. (1980),Survival Models and Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Elandt-Johnson, R. C. (1984), Analysis of Distributional Patterns of Deaths from Different Causes.Scand. Actuarial Journal, 157–173.

  • Fleming, T. R. andHarrington, T. P. (1991),Counting Processes and survival analysis. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hoem, J. M. (1969), Purged and partial Markov chains.Skan. Aktuarietidskr., 52, 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1983), An extension of Cox’s regression model’s.Int. Statist. Rev., 5, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, J. D. andPrentice, R. L. (1978), The Analysis of Failure Times in the Presence of Competing Risks.Biometrics, 34, 541–554.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch, J. D. andPrentice, R. L. (1980),The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. L. andMeier, P. (1958), Nonparametric estimator from incomplete observations.J. Amer. Statist. Ass., 53, 457–481.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, B., Anscher, M., Leopold, K., Deutsch, M., Gaydica, E., Dodge, R., Allen, K., Allen, D., Staub, E. W., Montana, G., Crawford, H. andWolfe, W. (1992), Patterns of Failure Following Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer, 1984–1990.Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 24, 633–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. P. andGoel, P. (1992),Survival Analysis: The State of the Art. Amsterdam: Kluwer Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, P. A. (1962), A decomposition theorem for supermartingales.Illinois Journ. Math., 6, 193–205.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moeschberger, M. L. andDavid, H. A. (1971), Life tests under competing causes of failure and the theory of competing risks.Biometrics, 27, 909–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, W. (1969), Hazard plotting for incomplete failure data.J. Qual. Technol., 1, 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakasa Rao, B. L. S. (1992),Identifiability in Stochastic Models: Characterization of Probability Distributions. New York: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Slud, E. V. andRubinstein, L. V. (1983), Dependent Competing Risks and Summary Survival Curves.Biometrika, 70, 643–649.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiatis, A. (1975), A nonidentifiability Aspect of the Problem of Competing Risks.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 72, 20–23.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università S. Raffaele, Milano, Italy

    Clelia Di Serio

Authors
  1. Clelia Di Serio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clelia Di Serio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Serio, C. Competing risk problems with no independence assumed: Does it make a difference?. J. Ital. Statist. Soc. 9, 39–51 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178957

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178957

Keywords

Search

Navigation