Advertisement

Induced current density in the foetus of pregnant workers in high magnetic field environments

  • C. Xue
  • A. W. Wood
  • T. Dovan
Scientific Papers

Abstract

There are moves to limit by legislation the amount of electric and magnetic fields that workers and the general public are exposed to. In work locations near wiring, cables & equipment carrying high electric currents, there are situations in which the proposed magnetic field limits could be exceeded. Since the limits for the general public are more conservative than those for workers and since the foetus or a pregnant worker should be afforded the status of a member of the general public, it is important to assess a worst-case scenario for the purposes of a general code of practice. Three different magnetic field exposures are modelled, which include the worst case — the body of a pregnant woman at a smallest distance of 30 cm to the conductor. All computations were done by using Multiple Multipole Program (MMP), which is based on the Generalized Multipole Technique (GMT) from ETH (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology), Zurich, Switzerland. In a worst-case scenario the proposed basic restrictions would be exceeded slightly in both maternal and foetal tissue. With appropriate pre-placement assessment, these over-exposures can be avoided.

Key words

magnetic fields electric fields adverse effects work practices pregnant workers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wertheimer, N., Leeper, E.,Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer, Amer J Epidemiol. 109, 273–284, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stuchly, M. A., Dawson, T.W.,International of low frequency electric and magnetic fields with the human body, Proc. IEEE 88, 643–664, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ICNIRP. Review of the Epidemiologic Literature on EMF & Health, Environmental Health Perspectives 109, Supp. 6, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    NRPB. Review of the Scientific Evidence for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (0–300 GHz), Available http://www.nrpb.org/publications/documents_of_nrpb/pdfs/do c_15_3.pdf. 15, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ESAA. Electricity Supply Association of Australia Guideline: Guidelines for live line barehand work, HB ESAA LLM 01–2000, Electricity Supply Association of Australia Ltd, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Health Phys 74, 494–522, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    IEEE. IEEE Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electromagnetic fields, 0–3 kHz, New York C95.6, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gabriel, S., R. W., Lau, R.W., Gabriel, C.,The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz, Phys Med Biol 41, 2251–69, 1996.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Durney, C. H.,Electromagnetic dosimetry for models of humans and animals: a review of theoretical and numerical techniques, Proc. IEEE 68, 33–40, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    10. Hafner, C., Bomholt, L.,The 3D electromagnetic wave Simulator, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hafner, C.,Post-modern Electromagnetics: Using intelligent Maxwell solvers, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1999.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ballisti, R., Hafner, Ch. The multiple multipole method in electro- and magnetostatic problems.IEEE Trans. on magnetics, MAG-19, 2367–2370, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuster, N., Ballisti., R. MMP method simulation of antennae with scattering objects in the closer near field.IEEE Trans. on magnetics, 25, 2881–2883, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kiener, S.,Eddy currents in bodies with sharp edges by the MMP-method. IEEE Trans. on magnetics 26, 482–485, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuster, N., Ballisti, R.,Multiple multipole method for simulating EM problems involving biological bodies, IEEE Trans. on biomedical engineering, 40, 611–620, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuster, N., Bomholt, L. H.,A block iterative technique to expand MMP’s applicability to EM problems of higher complexity, IEEE Trans. on microwave theory and techniques 42, 875–883, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deno, D. W.,Currents induced in the body by high voltage transmission line electric field — measurement and calculation of distribution and dose, IEEE Trans Power App Syst 96, 1517–1525, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martini, F.,Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice Hall, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biophysical Sciences & Electrical EngineeringSwinburne University of TechnologyVictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.SPI PowerNetMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations