Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Induced current density in the foetus of pregnant workers in high magnetic field environments

  • Scientific Papers
  • Published:
Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are moves to limit by legislation the amount of electric and magnetic fields that workers and the general public are exposed to. In work locations near wiring, cables & equipment carrying high electric currents, there are situations in which the proposed magnetic field limits could be exceeded. Since the limits for the general public are more conservative than those for workers and since the foetus or a pregnant worker should be afforded the status of a member of the general public, it is important to assess a worst-case scenario for the purposes of a general code of practice. Three different magnetic field exposures are modelled, which include the worst case — the body of a pregnant woman at a smallest distance of 30 cm to the conductor. All computations were done by using Multiple Multipole Program (MMP), which is based on the Generalized Multipole Technique (GMT) from ETH (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology), Zurich, Switzerland. In a worst-case scenario the proposed basic restrictions would be exceeded slightly in both maternal and foetal tissue. With appropriate pre-placement assessment, these over-exposures can be avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wertheimer, N., Leeper, E.,Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer, Amer J Epidemiol. 109, 273–284, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stuchly, M. A., Dawson, T.W.,International of low frequency electric and magnetic fields with the human body, Proc. IEEE 88, 643–664, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ICNIRP. Review of the Epidemiologic Literature on EMF & Health, Environmental Health Perspectives 109, Supp. 6, 2001.

  4. NRPB. Review of the Scientific Evidence for Limiting Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (0–300 GHz), Available http://www.nrpb.org/publications/documents_of_nrpb/pdfs/do c_15_3.pdf. 15, 2004.

  5. ESAA. Electricity Supply Association of Australia Guideline: Guidelines for live line barehand work, HB ESAA LLM 01–2000, Electricity Supply Association of Australia Ltd, 2000.

  6. ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Health Phys 74, 494–522, 1998.

  7. IEEE. IEEE Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electromagnetic fields, 0–3 kHz, New York C95.6, 2002.

  8. Gabriel, S., R. W., Lau, R.W., Gabriel, C.,The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz, Phys Med Biol 41, 2251–69, 1996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Durney, C. H.,Electromagnetic dosimetry for models of humans and animals: a review of theoretical and numerical techniques, Proc. IEEE 68, 33–40, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10. Hafner, C., Bomholt, L.,The 3D electromagnetic wave Simulator, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hafner, C.,Post-modern Electromagnetics: Using intelligent Maxwell solvers, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ballisti, R., Hafner, Ch. The multiple multipole method in electro- and magnetostatic problems.IEEE Trans. on magnetics, MAG-19, 2367–2370, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuster, N., Ballisti., R. MMP method simulation of antennae with scattering objects in the closer near field.IEEE Trans. on magnetics, 25, 2881–2883, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiener, S.,Eddy currents in bodies with sharp edges by the MMP-method. IEEE Trans. on magnetics 26, 482–485, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuster, N., Ballisti, R.,Multiple multipole method for simulating EM problems involving biological bodies, IEEE Trans. on biomedical engineering, 40, 611–620, 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuster, N., Bomholt, L. H.,A block iterative technique to expand MMP’s applicability to EM problems of higher complexity, IEEE Trans. on microwave theory and techniques 42, 875–883, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deno, D. W.,Currents induced in the body by high voltage transmission line electric field — measurement and calculation of distribution and dose, IEEE Trans Power App Syst 96, 1517–1525, 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martini, F.,Fundamentals of Anatomy and Physiology, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice Hall, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biophysical Sciences & Electrical Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn, 3122, Victoria, Australia

    C. Xue & A. W. Wood

  2. SPI PowerNet, Melbourne, Australia

    T. Dovan

Authors
  1. C. Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. W. Wood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Dovan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. W. Wood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xue, C., Wood, A.W. & Dovan, T. Induced current density in the foetus of pregnant workers in high magnetic field environments. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 27, 199–206 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178649

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178649

Key words

Search

Navigation