Advertisement

A ‘learning-by-doing’ treatment planning tutorial for medical physicists

  • J. Meyer
  • B. Hartmann
  • I. Kalet
Educational Note

Abstract

A framework for a tutorial for treatment planning in radiation oncology physics was developed, based on the University of Washington treatment planning systemPrism. The tutorial is aimed at students in Medical Physics to accompany the lectures on treatment planning to enhance their theoretical knowledge. A web-based layout was chosen to allow independent work of the students. The tutorial guides the students through three different learning modules, designed mainly to enhance their understanding of the processes involved in treatment planning but also to learn the specific features of a modern treatment planning system. Each of the modules contains four units, with the aim to introduce the relevantPrism features, practice skills in different tasks and finally check the learning outcomes with a challenge and a self-scoring quiz. A survey for students’ feedback completes the tutorial. Various tools and learning methods help to create an interactive, appealing learning environment, in which the emphasis is shifted from teacher-centred to student-centred learning paradigms. In summary,Prism lends itself well for educational purposes. The tutorial covers all main aspects of treatment planning. In its current form the tutorial is self-contained but still adjustable and expandable. The tutorial can be made available upon request to the authors.

Key words

education in medical physics Prism treatment planning system self-guided tutorial open-source software learning methods 

References

  1. 1.
    Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM).Homepag, [cited March 6, 2009], available from: http://www.acpsem.org.au/, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM).Executive summary-Training, Education and Accreditation Program (TEAP), [cited March 6, 2009], available from: http://www.acpsem.org.au/ subgroup/TEAP/TEAP_ROMP_Executive_Summary_V2_6.p df, 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    University of Canterbury-Department of Physics and Astronomy.Medical Physics Program, [cited March 6, 2009], available from: http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/medphys/, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Podgorsak, E.B.,Radiation Oncology Physics: A handbook for teachers and students, 1 ed. (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 2005).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khan, F.M.,The Physics of Radiation Therapy, 3 ed. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalet, I.J., Jacky, J.P., Austin-Seymour, M.M., Hummel, S.M., Sullivan, K.J. and Unger, J.M.,Prism: a new approach to radiotherapy planning software, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36(2), 451–461, 1996.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    University of Washington — Radiation Oncology.The Prism Radiation Treatment Planning Project, [cited March 6, 2009], available from: http://www.radonc.washington.edu/medinfo/prism/, 2008.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Red Hat Inc.Red Hat Enterprise Linux, [cited March 3, 2009], available from: http://www.redhat.com/rhel/, 2009.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franz Inc.Allegro Common Lisp 8.1, [cited March 6, 2009], available from: http://www.franz.com/products/allegrocl/,2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalet, I.J., Phillips, M.H., Giansiracusa, R.S. and Jacky, J.Prism System Implementation, Version 1.3, Technical Report University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, (available from: http://www.radonc.washington.edu/medinfo/ prism/design-13.ps.Z), 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalet, I.J., Young, G.D., Giansiracusa, R.S., Cho, P.S. and Jacky, J.P.,Prism Dose Computation Methods, Version 1.3, Technical Report University of Washington, Seattle, (available from: http://www.radonc.washington.edu/medinfo/ prism/dosecomp-13.ps), 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cho, P.S.,Validation of Prism Electron Beam Dose Computation, Technical Report University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, (available from:http://www.radonc.washington.edu/ medinfo/prism/validation.ps), 2002.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalet, I. J., Giansiracusa, R. S., Jacky, J. and Avitan, D.,A declarative implementation of the DICOM-3 network protocol, J Biomed Inform 36(3), 159–176, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cygwin.Cygwin Home, [cited March 3, 2009], available from: http://www.cygwin.com, 2009.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Herk, M., Zijp, L. and Meinders, J.Conquest DICOM software, Version 1.4.14 released, 6 March, 2009, Radiotherapy Department, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, (available from: http://www.xs4all.nl/≈ingenium/dicom.html), 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mozilla Foundation.The Seamonkey® Project, Version 1.1.12, [cited March 3, 2009], available from: http://www.seamonkeyproject. org. 2009.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jordan, D.K.Self-Scoring Quizzes, [cited February 25, 2009], available from: http://weber.ucsd.edu/∼dkjordan/resources/ quizzes/quizzes.html, 2009.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ICRU (InternationalCommission onRadiologicalUnits andMeasurements),Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by means of X-or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedure, Report No. 24, Bethesda, MD, USA, 1976.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bohsung, J., Gillis, S., Arrans, R., Bakai, A., De Wagter, C., Knoeoes, T., Mijnheer, B.J., Paiusco, M., Perrin, B. A., Welleweerd, H. and Williams, P.,IMRT treatment planning — A comparative inter-system and inter-centre planning exercise of the ESTRO QUASIMODO group, Radiother Oncol 76(3), 354–361, 2005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Universitätsklinikum Würzburg.Quasimodo Patientenmodell, [cited December 2, 2008], available from: http://www.daten. strahlentherapie.uni-wuerzburg.de/ quasimodo.html, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Douglas,ICRU Report 50—Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy, Medical Physics 21(6), 833–834, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morgan-Fletcher, S.L.,Prescribing, Recording and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy (Supplement to ICRU Report 50), ICRU Report 62, Br J Radiol 74(879), 294, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyer, J., Hummel, S.M., Cho, P.S., Austin-Seymour, M.M. and Phillips, M.H.,Automatic selection of non-coplanar beam directions for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, Br J Radiol 78(928), 316–327, 2005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Downing, K.F. and Holtz, J.K.,Online Science Learning: Best Practices and Technologies, 1st ed. (Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA, 2008).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donnely, R. and McSweeney, F.,Applied E-Learning and E-Teaching in Higher Education, 1st ed. (Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA, USA, 2008).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hattie, J.A.C.,Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement, 1st ed. (Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, UK, 2008).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kalet, I.J., Phillips, M.H., Jacky, J. and Giansiracusa, R.S.,Prism User’s Reference Manual, Version 1.5, Technical Report University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA, 2005. (available from: http://www.radonc.washington.edu/medinfo/ prism/user-refman-15.pdf), 2005.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine (ACPSEM),Radiation Oncology Medical Physics Clinical Training Guide, (available from: http://www.acpsem.org.au/subgroup/TEAP/ACPSEM_ROMP_CTG%20Print.pdf), 2008.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Phillips, M.H., Cho, P.S., Parsai, H. and Douglas, J.G.,Use of intensity modulation for missing tissue compensation of pediatric spinal fields, J Appl Clin Med Phys 4(4), 274–281, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meyer, J., Phillips, M.H., Cho, P.S., Kalet, I. and Doctor, J.N.,Application of influence diagrams to prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan selection, Phys Med Biol 49(9), 1637–1653, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Institut fär PhysikMartin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany
  3. 3.Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations