Abstract
A scatter correction scheme for radiographic images which is based on two-dimensional interpolation of local scatter measurements is described. Local scatter measurements are obtained using an aperture array. The effect of the scheme on physical imaging performance is evaluated by examining the broad-area contrast, edge sharpness, square wave response function and signal-to-noise ratio of images from a digital fluoroscopy system. It is found that the scheme generates substantial improvement in broad-area contrast and densitometric linearity, has no direct effect on sharpness and limiting spatial resolution, and considerably reduces the signal-to-noise ratio. This latter result is the sole deleterious feature of the correction scheme.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sorenson JA and Niklason LT,Scattered radiation in chest Radiography. In: VL Newhouse, Ed., Progress in Medical Imaging (Springer-Verlag: New York) pp. 159–184, 1988.
Floyd CE, Baker JA, Lo JY, et al.,Measurement of scatter fractions in clinical bedside radiography Radiol., 183, 857–861, 1992.
Maher KP and Malone JF,Computerised scatter correction in diagnostic radiology, Contemp. Phys., 38, 131–148, 1996.
Love LA and Kruger RA,Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering, Med. Phys., 14, 178–185, 1987.
Maher KP and Greaves AW,A contrast-detail study of interpolated scatter and glare correction of digital fluoroscopic images, Aust. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med, 15, 95–100, 1992.
Molloi SY and Mistretta CA,Scatter-glare corrections in quantitative dual-energy fluoroscopy, Med. Phys., 15, 289–297, 1988.
Seibert JA and Boone JM,X-ray scatter removal by Deconvolution. Med. Phys., 15, 567–575, 1988.
Floyd CE, Beatty PT and Ravin CE,Scatter compensation in digital chest radiography using Fourier deconvolution, Invest. Radiol., 24, 30–33, 1989.
Wagner FC, Macovski A and Nishimura DG,Dual-energy xray projection imaging: Two sampling schemes for the correction of scattered radiation, Med. Phys., 15,732–748, 1988.
Shaw CG and Plewes DB,Quantitative digital subtraction angiography: Two scanning techniques for the correction of scattered radiation and veiling glare, Radiol., 157, 247–253, 1985.
Boone JM,Scatter correction algorithm for digitally acquired radiographs: Theory and results, Med. Phys., 13, 319–328, 1986.
Lo JY, Floyd CE, Baker JA et al.,Scatter compensation in digital chest radiography using the posterior beam stop technique, Med. Phys., 21, 435–443, 1994.
Fivez C, Wambacq P, Vuylsteke P, et al.,Two correction methods for scattered radiation in digital chest radiographs, Patt. Recog. Imag. Anal., 5, 107–113, 1995.
Maher KP,Comparison of scatter measurement techniques in Digital fluoroscopy, Phys. Med. Biol., 38, 1977–1983, 1993.
ICRU Report 54,Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image, Quality (International Commission on Radiation Units & Measurement: Bethesda) pp. 1–5, 1996.
Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA et al.,Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge University Press: London) pp 77–101, 1986.
Fujita H, Tsai D-Y, Itoh T, et al.,A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 11, 34–39, 1992.
Dobbins JT,Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems, Med. Phys., 22, 171–181, 1995.
Maher KP, O’Connor MK and Malone JF,Experimental examination of videodensitometry of large opacifications in digital subtraction angiography, Phys. Med. Biol., 32, 1273–82, 1987.
Balter S, Ergun D, Tscholl E et al.,Digital subtraction angiography: Fundamental noise characteristics, Radiol., 152, 195–198, 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maher, K.P. Scatter correction in digital radiography using interpolated local sampling of aperture signals. Australas. Phys. & Eng. Sci. Med. 24, 79–85 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178350
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178350