Advertisement

A study of the effect of sensorimotor experiences on the retention and application of two fundamental physics ideas

  • Yannis Hadzigeorgiou
  • Mike Savage
Article

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether sensorimotor experiences can help young students ages 9 to 10 to construct a mental model involving a relationship between the speed of the molecules of a substance and its temperature. The sample consisted of 86 children who were randomly assigned to two groups. The children of the first group were presented with photographs and animated pictures regarding the motion of “little balls”—the molecules—in various contexts, while the children of the other group participated in sensorimotor activities regarding the same contexts. For the assessment of children’s understanding, six tasks involving visual material (photographs and animated pictures) were used. This procedure took place one week after the treatment and again four weeks later. The significant difference that was found through a t-test between the two groups on both occasions, the correlation coefficients between the scores on the two tests for both groups, and the effect sizes provide support for the effectiveness of the treatment based on sensorimotor activities as far as the development of the aforementioned relationship is concerned. Further research is warranted to confirm whether these findings can be generalized over to other populations and other science concepts.

Keywords

Language Symbolic Representation Sensorimotor Activity Sensorimotor Experience Inference Learning Animated Picture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Ackermann, E. (1999). Enactive representations in learning: Pretense, models, machines. In J. Bliss, P. Light, & R. Saljo (Eds.),Advances in learning and instruction (pp. 1–20). Berlin: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Borg, W., & Gall, M. (1989).Educational research, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. S. (1966).Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Case, R. (1985).Intellectual development: A systematic reinterpretation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, L., & Holliday, M. (1979).Statistics for education. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000).Research methods in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, A., & Gentner, D. (1992). How people construct mental models. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.).Cultural models in language and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Driver, R. (1984). Cognitive psychology and pupils frameworks in mechanics. In P. Lijnse (Ed.).The many faces of teaching and learning mechanics (pp. 22–25). Proceedings of a Conference on Physics Education. Utrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Egan, K. (1997).The educated mind: How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fraser, B., Walberg, H., Welch, W., & Hattie, J. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research.International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gardner, H. (1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Gardner, H. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences.Educational Researcher, 18, 4–9.Google Scholar
  13. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (1987).The development of a rationale for the teaching of Newtonian mechanics through human movement. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.Google Scholar
  14. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (1994).Conceptual representation of the Newtonian model of motion in university physics students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls.Google Scholar
  15. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (1997). Relationships, meaning and the science curriculum.Curriculum and Teaching, 2, 83–90.Google Scholar
  16. Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Williams, J. (1998).The development of mental models through sensorimotor experiences: A study of the development of the concept of mechanical equilibrium in preschool children. Unpublished paper, University of the Aegean, Rhodes, Greece.Google Scholar
  17. Hannaford, C. (1995).Smart moves: Why learning is not all in your head. Arlington, VA: Great Ocean Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Holland, J., Holyoak, K., Nisbett, R., & Thagart, P. (1987).Induction Processes of inference, learning and discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, M. (1987).The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kolb, D. (1985).The learning style inventory. Boston: McBer.Google Scholar
  21. Krnel, D., Watson, R., & Glazar, S. (1998). Survey of research related to the development of the concept of matter.International Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 257–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Novak, J., & Gowin, B. (1984).Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nussbaum, J., & Novak, J. (1976). An assessment of children’s concepts of the earth utilizing structured interviews.Science Education, 60, 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prawat, S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy and disposition in students: A research synthesis.Review of Educational Research, 59, 1–41.Google Scholar
  25. Reif, F., & Larkin, J. (1991). Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparisons and learning implications.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 733–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rennie, L. (1998). Improving the interpretation and reporting of quantitative research.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rumelhart, D., & Norman, D. (1981). Analogical processes in learning. In J. Anderson (Ed.),Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics.European Journal of Science Education, 1, 205–221.Google Scholar
  29. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood.Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vosniadou, S., & Kempner, L. (1993).Mental models of heat. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, New Orleans.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of the AegeanRhodesGreece
  2. 2.University of LeedsEngland

Personalised recommendations