Microprobe aided mapping of areal element concentration and microporosity in chalk

  • Ida Lind


By use of the autoscan mode of a microprobe on polished chalk surfaces, maps can be constructed representing areal concentrations of elements and areal distribution of microporosity. The maps presented herein are composed of 400 12×15 micron scenes, but maps composed of 10,000 scenes have been obtained.

The apparent porosity is derived by difference as 100 percent minus the sum of the chemical analysis. In the chalk samples used here the apparent porosity derived by this method is systematically lower than the porosity derived from mercury immersion of core chips and from logs, and consequently a correction factor has been derived. Low porosities determined using the microprobe are probably related to depth of beam penetration, which is comparable with the grain size of highly porous chalk.

The main advantage of the method described here is the direct linking of chemical data and microporosity on a millimeter scale.


Chalk Apparent Porosity Stylolite Areal Concentration Bulk Porosity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. CHAYES, F., 1954, The theory of thin-section analysis:Jour. Geology, v. 62, p. 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. EHRLICH, R., KENNEDY, S.K., CRABTREE, S.J., and CANNON, R.L., 1984, Petrographic image analysis, I. Analysis of reservoir pore complexes:Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 54, p. 1365–1378.Google Scholar
  3. EHRLICH, R., HORKOWITZ, K.O., HORKOWITZ, J.R., and CRABTREE, S.J., Jr., (IN PRESS), Objective and Functional Classification of Reservoir Porosity: Relating PIA to Petrophysics II: AAPG.Google Scholar
  4. ESSENE, E.J., 1983, Solid solutions and solvi among metamorphic carbonates with applications to geologic thermobarometry,in Reeder, R.J. ed., Carbonates: Mineralogy and Chemistry: Mineralogical Society of America,Reviews in Mineralogy, v. 11, p. 77–96.Google Scholar
  5. GOLDSTEIN, J.I., NEWBURY, D.E., ECHLIN, P., JOY, D.C., FIORI, C., and LIFSHIN, E., 1981,Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis: New York and London, Plenum Press, 673 p.Google Scholar
  6. JAROSEWICH, E., AND MACINTYRE, I.G., 1983, Carbonate reference samples for electron microprobe and scanning electron microscope analysis:Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 53, p. 677–678.Google Scholar
  7. ETRUK, W., 1988, The capabilities of the microprobe kontron image analysis system: Application to mineral benefication:Scanning Microscopy, v. 2, p. 1247–1256.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ida Lind
    • 1
  1. 1.The Institute for Applied GeologyThe Technical University of DenmarkLyngbyDenmark

Personalised recommendations