Advertisement

Four social psychological lenses for developmental psychology

  • Tania Zittoun
  • Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont
Article

Abstract

How can the advances of social and developmental psychology be integrated? This conceptual paper proposes to examine four basic theoretical models of social situations through which learning and development have been observed in the post-piagetian tradition: the psychosocial triangle, the frame, models of transfer and transitions, and models integrating the notion of cultural instrument. We show different dynamics highlighted by series of studies using these models. We finally discuss the notions of development and of the person emerging through such social developmental approaches.

Key words

Cultural instrument Development Frame Model Psychosocial triangle Transition 

Résumé

Comment intégrer les progrès de la psychologie et de la psychologie du développement? Cet article théorique propose d’examiner quatre modèles utilisés dans la tradition post-piagétienne pour étudier le développement et l’apprentissage dans leur situation sociale: le triangle psychosocial, le cadre, l’idée de transfert ou de transition, et les modèles intégrant l’idée d’outil culturel. Nous montrons les dynamiques que les travaux utilisant ces modèles ont pu mettre en évidence. Nous discutons finalement les notions même de développement et de personne qui se dégagent de ces approches.

References

  1. Ames, G.J., & Murray, F.B. (1982). When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict.Developmental Psychology, 18, 894–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one?Child development, 59, 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachmann, K., & Grossen, M. (2007). Contextes et dynamiques des interactions entre apprenants dans une situation de mentorat. In L. Allal & L. Mottier Lopez (Eds.)Régulation des apprentissages en situation scolaire et en formation (pp. 129–147). Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
  4. Baltes, P.B., & Staudinger, U.M. (1996).Interactive minds. Life span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barth, B.M. (1993).Le savoir en construction. Paris: Retz.Google Scholar
  6. Bausch, L., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Schürch, D. (2007). Situation d’entretien: Essayer de faire parler autrui sur ses pratiques et… découvrir sa propre pratique d’intervieweur. In I. Plazaola Giger & K. Stroumza (Eds.),Paroles de praticiens et description de l’activité Problématisation méthodologique pour la formation et la recherche (pp. 137–159), Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
  7. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education.Review of research in education, 24, 101–139.Google Scholar
  8. Blandin, B. (2002).La construction du social par les objects. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  9. Bourgeois, E. (Ed.). (1996).L’adulte en formation. Regards pluriels. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  10. Bruner, J.S. (1990).Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bruner, J.S. (1996). Frames for thinking: Ways of making meaning. In D.-R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.),Modes of thought: Exploration in culture and cognition (pp. 93–105). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Carpendale, J.I.M., & Müller, U. (Eds.). (2004).Social interaction and the development of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Carugati, F. (2004). Learning and thinking in adolescence and youth. How to inhabit new provinces of meaning. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge (Eds.),Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 119–140). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cesari Lusso, V. (2001).Quand le défi est appeléintégration: Parcours de socialisation et de personnalisation de jeunes issus de la migration. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  15. Chapman, M. (1991). The epistemic triangle. Operative and communicative components of cognitive development. In M. Chandler & M. Chapman (Eds.),Criteria for competence: Controversies in the conceptualisation and assessment of children’s abilities (pp. 209–228) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Chevallard, Y., & Johusa, M.-A. (1998).La transposition didactique: Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné; suivie d’un exemple de transposition didactique. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage.Google Scholar
  17. Cole, M. (1996).Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Costall, A. (1998).An ecological approach to agency. Paper presented at the Fourth congress of the International Society for cultural Research and Activity Theory: Activity theory and cultural historical approaches to social practice, University of Aarbus, Denmark, June 7–11.Google Scholar
  19. Davenport, P., Howe, C., & Noble, A. (2000). Peer interaction in the teaching of nathematics: explanation and the coordination of knowledge.Revue Suisse des Sciences de l’Education [Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften],3, 481–507.Google Scholar
  20. Doise, W., & Hanselmann, C. (1991). Conflict and social marking in the acquisition of operational thinking.Learning and Instruction, 1, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1981).Le développement social de l’intelligence. Paris: InterEditions.Google Scholar
  22. Donaldson, M. (1978).Children’s minds. New-York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Donaldson, M. (1982). Conservation: what is the question?British Journal of Psychology, 73, 199–207.Google Scholar
  24. Durkin, K. (1995).Developmental social psychology. From infancy to old age. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Duyeen, G. (1997). Psychological development as a social process. In L. Smith, J. Dockrell, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.),Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond. Future issues for developmental psychology and education (pp. 67–90). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Erikson, E. H. (1975). “Identity crisis” in autobiographical perspective.Life history and the historical moment (pp. 17–46). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Gilly, M. (1980).Maître élève, rôles institutionnels et représentations. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  28. Gilly, M., & Roux, J.-P. (1984). Efficacité comparée du travail individuel et du travail en interaction socio-cognitive dans l’appropriation et la mise en oeuvre de règles de résolution chez les enfants de 11 à 12 ans.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 4(2), 171–188.Google Scholar
  29. Gilly, M., Roux, J.-P., & Trognon, A. (Eds.). (1999).Apprendre dans l’interaction: Analyses des médiations sémiotiques (pp. 219–240). Nancy: Presses Universitaires, Publications de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar
  30. Green, A. (2002).Idees directrices pour une psychanalyse contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  31. Grob, A. (2001). Transition from youth to adulthood across cultures. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.),International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 16678–16682). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  32. Grossen, M. (1988).La construction de l’intersubjectivité en situation de test. Cousset, Fribourg, CH: Delval.Google Scholar
  33. Grossen, M. (2000). Institutional framings in learning and teaching. In H. Cowie, V.D. Aalsvort, & N. Mercer (Eds.),Social interaction in learning and instruction: The meaning of discourse for the construction of knowledge (pp. 21–34). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  34. Grossen, M., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Ed.). (1992).L’espace thérapeutique. Cadres et contextes. Neuchâtel, Switzerland/ Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
  35. Grossen, M., Liengme Bessire, M.-J., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1997). Construction de l’interaction et dynamiques socio-cognitives In M. Grossen & B. Py (Eds.),Pratiques sociales et médiations symboliques (pp. 221–247). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Heath, S.B. (1996). Ruling places: Adaptation in development by inner-city youth. In R. Jessor Colby, A., & Shweder, R.A. (Eds.),Ethnography and human development, Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 225–251). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  37. Heath, S.B. (2004). Risks, rules, and roles: Youth perspectives on the work of learning for community development. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge (Eds.),Joining Society: Social Interaction and Learning in Adolescence and Youth (pp. 41–70) Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hinde, R.A., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds.). (1985).Social relationships and cognitive development. Oxford: Clarendon/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Houssaye, J. (1988).Le triangle pédagogique. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  40. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., & Rodgers, C. (1992). The acquisition of conceptual knowledge in science by primary school children: Group interaction and the understanding of motion down an incline.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 113–130.Google Scholar
  41. Howe, C., Tolmie, A., Duchak-Tanner, V., & Rattray, C. (2000). Hypothesis testing in science: Group consensus and the acquisition of conceptual and procedural knowledge.Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hundeide, K. (2004). A new identity, a new life-style. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge (Eds.),Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 86–108). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Leman, P.J., & Duveen, G. (2003). Gender identity, social influence and children’s conversations.Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Light, P. (1986). Context, conservation and conversation. In P.L.M. Richard (Ed.),Children of social words. Development in a social context. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  45. Light, P., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1989). Social context effects in learning and testing. In J.-A. Sloboda (Ed.),Cognition and Social Worlds (pp. 99–112). Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Marro-Clément, P., Trognon, A., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2000). Processus interlocutoires dans une tâche de conservation des liquides. In M. Gilly, J.-P. Roux, & A. Trognon (Eds.),Apprendre dans l’interaction. Analyse des médiations sémiotiques (pp. 163–180). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  47. Mead, G.H. (1934/1967).Mind, self & society. From the standpoint of a social behaviourist. Chicago: Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mercer, N. (1995).The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  49. Monteil, J.-M., & Huguet, P. (1993). The influence of social comparison situations on individual task performance. Experimental illustrations.International journal of Psychology, 28, 627–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moscovici, S. (1984/2003). Introduction. Le domaine de la psychologie sociale. In S. Moscovici (Ed.),Psychologie social (pp. 5–22). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  51. Muller Mirza, N. (2005).Psychologie culturelle d’une formation d’adulte. L’île aux savoirs voyageurs. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  52. Nicolet, M. (1995).Dynamiques relationnelles et processus cognitifs. Etude du marquage social chez des enfants de 5 à 9 ans Lausanne/Paris: Ed. Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
  53. Pain, S. (1981/1985).Les difficultés d’apprentissage, diagnostic et traitement. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  54. Pain, S. (1985).La fonction de l’ignorance. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  55. Palmonari, A. (1993).Psicologia dell’adolescenza. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  56. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1980).Social interaction and cognitive development in children. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1993). What is it that develops?Cognition and Instruction, 11, 197–205.Google Scholar
  58. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2001). Psychologie sociale de la construction de l’espace de pensée. In J.J. Ducret (Ed.),Actes du colloque. Constructivisme: Usages et perspectives en éducation (vol. I, pp. 65–82). Genève, Département de l’Instruction Publique: Service de la recherche en éducation.Google Scholar
  59. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2004). Thinking spaces of the young. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge (Eds.),Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 3–10). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2008). Piaget: His elders and his peers. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont & J.-M. Barrelet (Eds.),Jean Piaget and Neuchâtel. The learner and the scholar (pp. 202–231). Hove & New-York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  61. Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Nicolet, M. (2001). Vers un renouvellement de la réflexion épistémologique en psychologie? In A.-N. Perret-Clermont & M. Nicolet (Eds.),Interagir et connaître. Enjeux et régulations sociales dans le développement cognitif (pp. 311–319). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  62. Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Zittoun, T. (2002) Esquisse d’une psychologie de la transition.Education permanente. Revue Suisse pour la Formation Continue, 1, 12–15.Google Scholar
  63. Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Carugati, F., & Oates, J. (2004). A socio-cognitive perspective on learning and development. In J. Oates & A. Geyson (Eds.),Cognitive & language development in children (pp. 305–332). Oxford: The Open University Press & Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  64. Piaget, J. (1932).The moral judgment of the child. London: K. Paul Trench Trubner.Google Scholar
  65. Piaget, J. (1950/1995). Explanation in sociology. In L. Smith (Ed.),Sociological studies (pp. 30–96). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Piaget, J. (1960). Problèmes de la psycho-sociologie de l’enfance. In G. Gurvitch (Ed.),Traité de sociologie (vol. II, pp. 54–229). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  67. Piaget, J. (1976). Autobiographie. In G. Busino (Dir.), Les sciences sociales avec et après Jean Piaget.Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, XIV (38–39), 1–43.Google Scholar
  68. Psaltis, C. (2005).Social relations and cognitive development: The influence of conversation types and representations of gender. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  69. Psaltis, C., & Duveen, G. (2006). Social relations and cognitive development: The influence of conversation types and representations of gender.European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rabardel, P. (1999). Le langage comme instrument? Eléments pour une théorie instrumentale étendue. In Y. Clot (Ed.),Avec Vygotsky (pp. 241–265). Paris: La Dispute.Google Scholar
  71. Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., & Teasley, S.D. (Eds.). (1991).Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC, USA. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  72. Rijsman, J. (2001). Partage et normes d’équité: Recherches sur le développement social de l’intelligence. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont & M. Nicolet (Eds.),Interagir et connaître. Enjeux et régulations sociales dans le développement cognitif (édition augmentée, pp. 123–137). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  73. Rijsman, J.B. (2008). Social comparison as social construction. Theory and illustration.Dossiers de Psychologie et Education, 63.Google Scholar
  74. Rochex, J.-Y. (1999).Le sens de l’expérience scolaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  75. Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process In W. Damon (Ed.),Handbook of child psychology [5th ed., vol. 2, D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.),Cognition, perception, and language] (pp. 523–573). New-York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  76. Rommetveit, R. (1976). On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In L.H. Strickland, K.J. Gergen, & F.J. Aboud (Eds.),Social Psychology in Transition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rommetveit, R. (1978). On piagetian cognitive operations, semantic competence, and message structure in adult-child communication. In I. Markova (Ed.),The social context of language (pp. 113–150). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  78. Säljö, R. (2003). Epilogue: From transfer to boundary-crossing. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engström (Eds.),Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 311–321). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  79. Säljö, R., & Wyndhamn, J. (1993). Solving everyday problems in the formal setting: An empirical study of the school as context for thought. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.),Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 327–342). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Schaffer, H.R. (1977).Studies in mother-infant interaction. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  81. Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L. (1986).Maître-élève-savoir: Analyse psychosociale du jeu et des enjeux de relation didactique. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Education, Université de Genève.Google Scholar
  82. Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L., & Leutenegger, F. (2005). Une relecture des phénomènes transpositifs à la lumière de la didactique comparée.Revue Suisse des Sciences de l’Education, 27(3), 407–429.Google Scholar
  83. Schubauer-Leoni, M.L., & Ntamakiliro, L. (1994). La construction de probèmes impossibles.Revue des Sciences de l’Education, 20(1), 87–113.Google Scholar
  84. Schubauer-Leoni, M.L., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1997). Social interactions and mathematics learning. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.),Learning and teaching mathematics. An international perspective (pp. 265–283) Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  85. Schubauer-Leoni, M.L., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., & Grossen, M. (1992). The construction of adult child intersubjectivity in psychological research and school. In M. von Cranach, W. Doise, & G. Mugny (Eds.),Social representations and the social bases of knowledge (vol. 1, pp. 69–77). Bern: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  86. Schwarz, B.B., & Linchevski, L. (2007). The role of task design and argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction: The case of proportional reasoning.Learning and Instruction, 17, 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schwarz, B., Neuman, Y., & Biezuner, S. (2000). Two wrongs may make a right… if they argue together.Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 461–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schwarz, B., Perret-Clermont, A.N., Trognon, A., & Marro, P. (2008). Emergent learning in successive activities. Learning in interaction in a laboratory context.Pragmatics and Cognition, 16(1), 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sensevy, G., Mercier, A., & Schubauer-Leoni, M.-L. (2000). Vers un modèle de l’action didactique du professeur à propos de la course à 20.Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 20(3), 263–304.Google Scholar
  90. Sokol, B.W., & Chandler, M.J. (2004). A bridge too far: On the relations between moral and secular reasoning. In J.I.M. Carpendale & U. Müller (Eds.),Social interaction and the development of knowledge (pp. 155–174). Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  91. Sorsana, C. (2003). Comment l’interaction coopérative rend-elle plus “savant”? Quelques réflexions concernant les conditions nécessaires au fonctionnement dialogique du conflit sociocognitif.L’Orientation Scolaire et Professionnelle, 32(3), 437–473.Google Scholar
  92. Tomasello, M. (1999).The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge/London: Harvard University press.Google Scholar
  93. Tudge, J., & Winterhoff, P. (1993). Can young children benefit from collaborative problem solving? Tracing the effects of partner competence and feedback.Social Development, 2(3), 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Valsiner, J. (1989).Human development and culture: The social nature of personality and its study. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  95. Valsiner, J. (1998).The guided mind: A sociogenetic approach to personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Valsiner, J. (2000).Culture and human development. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  97. Valsiner, J., & Connolly, K.J. (2003). The nature of development: The continuing dialogue of processes and outcomes. In J. Valsiner & K.J. Conolly (Eds.),Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. ix-xviii) London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhei: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  98. Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R. (2000).The social mind: Construction of the idea. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Vygotsky, L.S. (1930). Tool and symbol in child’s development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.),L.S. Vygotsky, Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 19–30). Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Vygotsky, L.S. (1997).The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (vol. 4, edited by R.W. Rieber, M.J. Hall, trans.). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  101. Vygotsky, L.S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.),The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  102. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible sociocultural model of cognitive development.Learning and Instruction, 9, 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wells, G. (1993). Intersoggettività e costruzione di conoscenze. In C. Pontecorvo (Ed.),La condivisione della conoscenza (pp. 353–379). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
  104. Winnicott, D.W. (1971/2001).Playing and reality. Philadelphia/Sussex: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Zittoun, T. (2004a). Preapprenticeship as a transitional space. In A.-N. Perret-Clermont, C. Pontecorvo, L. Resnick, T. Zittoun, & B. Burge (Eds.),Joining society: Social interaction and learning in adolescence and youth (pp. 153–176). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Zittoun, T. (2004b). Symbolic competencies for developmental transitions: The case of the choice of first names.Culture & Psychology, 10(2), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zittoun, T. (2005).Donner la vie, choisir un nom. Engendrements symboliques. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  108. Zittoun, T. (2006a).Transitions. Development through symbolic resources. Coll. Advances in Cultural Psychology: Constructing Development Greenwich (CT): InfoAge.Google Scholar
  109. Zittoun, T. (2006b).Insertions. A quinze ans, entre échec et apprentissage. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  110. Zittoun, T. (2006c). Difficult secularity: Talmud as symbolic resource.Outlines. Critical Social Studies, 8 (2), 59–75.Google Scholar
  111. Zittoun, T. (2007). Symbolic resources and responsibility in transitions.Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 15(2), 193–211.Google Scholar
  112. Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., & Psaltis, C. (2007). The metaphor of the triangle in theories of human development.Human Development, 50, 208–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal/ Springer Netherlands 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut de Psychologie et Éducation, Faculté des Lettres et Sciences HumainesUniversité de NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations