Advertisement

Activating multi-ethnic youth for smoking prevention: Design, baseline findings, and implementation of project SPLASH

  • Karen Glanz
  • Kevin B. Lunde
  • Tricia Leakey
  • Jay Maddock
  • Karin Koga
  • Jessica Yamauchi
  • Gertraud Maskarinec
  • Dorothy Shigaki
Articles

Abstract

Background. Achieving significant reductions in tobacco use by youth is an important challenge. There is a pressing need to develop and evaluate innovative strategies that stimulate youth involvement and are effective in multi-ethnic populations. This article describes an innovative tobacco prevention trial, and reports baseline characteristics of participants and findings about implementation of the curriculum.Methods. The aim of Project SPLASH is to evaluate the impact of a school-based smoking prevention intervention that emphasizes active involvement of middle school students, on rates of smoking initiation and regular smoking in a multi-ethnic cohort of youth in Hawaii. Project SPLASH is a group randomized trial that compares a 2-year innovative intervention with a social influence prevention program, in 20 public schools in Hawaii. The main outcome is mean 30-day smoking prevalence rates.Results. The response rate was 78.4%. Approximately 1 in 4 students had tried smoking and 30-day smoking prevalence at baseline was 8%. Intervention and control groups were comparable in terms of tobacco use, gender, ethnicity, behavioral, environmental, and psychosocial characteristics. Differences in ethnic identification, socio-economic status, acculturation, and involvement in prevention activities may be due to chance. The intervention was well implemented by teachers across both the intervention and control school classes.Conclusion. For this study, 20 schools in Hawaii with close to 4000 participating students were recruited. Student smoking behavior and curriculum implementation were comparable by group status. The intervention study has the potential to elucidate how youth respond to an intervention with student involvement that incorporates cognitive and social action components.

Keywords

Smoking Behavior Tobacco Control Smoking Prevention Control School Health Educ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Burns DM, Johnston LD. Overview of recent changes in adolescent smoking behavior. In: Burns DM (ed), Changing Adolescent Smoking Prevalence: Wehre It Is and Why, Smoking and Tobacco Control, Monograph 14. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (USD HHS), 2002, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Center for Disease Control (CDC). Youth tobacco surveillance — United States, 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2001;50:1–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hopper JA, Gallagher RE. Tobacco cessation: New challenges, new opportunities. J. Cancer Educ. 2003;18:128–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rundall TG, Bruvold WH. A meta-analysis of school-based smoking and alcohol use prevention programs. Health Educ Qtly. 1988;15:317–334.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tobler N. Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: Results of the 1993 meta-analysis. In: Bukoski WJ (ed), Meta-Analysis of Drug Abuse Prevention Programs. NIDA Research Monograph 170. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, NIH, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DiSogra L, Glanz K. The 5 a day virtual classroom: An on-line strategy to promote healthful eating. J Amer Dieter Assoc. 2000;100:349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bureau of the Census. U.S. Census, Profile of General Demographic Characteristics for Hawaii: 2000. Retrieved on April 14, 2002 from http://www.census.gov Last accessed: May 4, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klingle RS, Miller M. The 1998 Hawaii Student Alcohol and Drug Use Study (1991-1998): Hawaii Adolescent Treatment Needs Assessment. Honolulu, HI: Hawaii Department of Health, Alcohol and Drug Abuse Divisoon, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foote-Whyte W. Social Theory for Social Action: How Individuals and Organizations Learn to Change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1991.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Antonovsky, A. Unraveling the Mystery of Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sussman S, Dent CW, Stacy AW, et al. Project towards no tobacco use: 1-year behavior outcomes. Am J Publ Health. 1993;83:1245–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sussman S, Dent CW, Stacy AW, et al. Project towards no tobacco use: implementation, process and post-test knowledge evaluation. Health Educ Res. 1993;8:109–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dent CW, Sussman S, Stacy AW, et al. Two-year behavior outcomes of project towards no tobaco use. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63:676–677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leakey T, Lunde KB, Koga K, et al. Written parental consent and the use of incentives in a youth smoking prevention trial: A case study from project SPLASH. Am J Eval. 2004;25:509–523.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jessor R, Donovan JE, Costa FM. Beyond Adolescence: Problem Behavior and Young Adult Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, et al. The validity of self-reported smoking: A review and meta-analysis. Am J Publ Health. 1994;84:1086–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scarinci IC, Robinson LA, Klesges RC, et al. Proxy measures of socioeconomic status (SES) in adolescents and their relationship to cigarette smoking. Presented at 128th Annual Meeting, American Public Health Association, Boston, MA; November 2000.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen FM, Breiman RF, Farley M, et al. Geocoding and linking data from population-based surveillance and the U.S. Census to evaluate the impact of median household income on the epidemiology of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infections. Am J Epidem. 1998;148:1212–1218.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pierce JP, Gilpin E, Burns D. Does tobacco advertising target young people to start smoking? JAMA. 1991;266:3154–3158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG. National Survey Results on Drug Use From the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1993. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, NIH Vol 1. Secondary School Students, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferguson MA, Valenti JM. Communicating with environmental and health risk takers: an individual differences perspective. Health Educ Qtly. 1991;18:303–318.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lynch BS, Bonnie RJ. (eds). Growing Up Tobacco Free: Preventing Nicotine Addiction in Children and Youths. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plummer BA, Velicer WF, Redding CA, et al. Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking: measurement and validation in a large, school-based population of adolescents. Addict Behav. 2001;26:551–571.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Donner A, Birkett N, Buck C. Randomization by cluster: Sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidem. 1981;114:906–914.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rooney BL, Murray DM. A meta-analysis of smoking preventionprograms after adjustment for errors in the unit of analysis. Health Educ Qtly. 1996;23:48–64.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 1986;73:13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sy A. Factors Influencing Teachers’ Implementation of an Innovative Tobacco Use Prevention Curriculum Targeting Multiethnic Youth: Project SPLASH. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, unpublished dissertation, 2005.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lantz PM, Jacobson PD, Warner KE, et al. Investing in youth tobacco control: A review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tabacco Control. 2000;9:47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Association for Cancer Education 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Glanz
    • 2
  • Kevin B. Lunde
    • 1
  • Tricia Leakey
    • 1
  • Jay Maddock
    • 1
  • Karin Koga
    • 1
  • Jessica Yamauchi
    • 1
  • Gertraud Maskarinec
    • 1
  • Dorothy Shigaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Cancer Research Center of HawaiiUniversity of HawaiiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlanta

Personalised recommendations