Skip to main content
Log in

What do elementary students know about insects?

  • Published:
Journal of Elementary Science Education

Abstract

An interview study of 56 elementary students (grades K-6) was conducted during the summer. The purpose of the study was to determine the students’ understanding about insect characteristics, their life cycles, environmental conditions, and their impacts on humans. Third graders and older students had a broader understanding about insects’ characteristics than K-2 students. Overall, students lacked an understanding of insects’ life cycle which differs from Shepardson’s (1997) three-stage model that omitted the egg. Students had greater personal knowledge about the harmful than about the helpful aspects of insects for humans. Suggestions are made on building units of instruction using students’ personal questions about insects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (1992).Insect potpourri: Adventures in entomology. Gainesville, FL: Sandhill Crane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, L., Kim, Y., & Brent, B. (2002). Determining preservice students understanding about electricity with K-W-L.CESI, 35(1), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borror, D., Triplehorn, C., & Johnson, N. (1989).Study of insects (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M. (1998). Trends in children’s concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates.Journal of Biological Education, 32, 112–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985).Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Educational Researcher, 25, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R., Koballa, T., Flage, L., & Pyle, E. (1996).WOW BUGS TM:New life for life science. Athens, GA: Riverview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996).National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L:A teaching strategy that develops active reading of expository text.The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pursuing excellence: A study of U.S. fourth-grade mathematics and science achievement in international context. (1997). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Shepardson, D. (1997). Of butterflies and beetles: First graders’ ways of seeing and talking about insect life cycles.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 873–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strommen, E. (1995). Lions and tigers and bears, oh my! Children’s conceptions of forests and their inhabitantes.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 683–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, P., Gal-Chappin, R., & Nussnovitz, R. (1981). How do junior high students conceptualize intermediate and living and nonliving?Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S., & Reiss, A. (1999). Learning about skeletons and other organ systems of vertebrate animals.Science Education International, 10(1), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.),Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1992).The diversity of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lloyd H. Barrow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrow, L.H. What do elementary students know about insects?. J Elem Sci Edu 14, 53–60 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173848

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173848

Keywords

Navigation