Journal of Elementary Science Education

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Does participating in an undergraduate elementary science methods course make a difference?

  • David P. Butts
  • Thomas R. Koballa
  • Thomas D. Elliott


Beginning with the question, does it make a differencewhat skills are developed or inwhat sequence they are introduced, the results of this study show that science teaching skills associated with personal survival are highly visible in both the expectations of prospective teachers and in what they value from a science methods course. It is equally clear that as they become confident in their personal science knowledge base, and competent in translating this into instructional plans for children, prospective teachers become aware of the need to deal with more mature concerns of how to effectively manage children in the learning environment. As an introductory science methods course, this focus on the personal concerns of the prospective teachers makes a difference in the confidence with which they approach teaching science.


Science Teaching Preservice Teacher Science Method Prospective Teacher Pedagogical Content Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ajzen, I. (1988).Attitude, personality, and behavior. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R., & Mitchener, C. (1994). Research on science teacher education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.)Handbook on Research on Science Teaching and Learning (1st Ed., p. 3–44). New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
  3. Atwater, M., Gardner, C., & Knight C. (1991). Beliefs and attitudes of urban primary teachers toward physical science and teaching physical science.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 3, 3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boone, W. (1993). Preservice elementary teachers’ views toward a science methods course.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 5, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butts, D., Koballa, T., Anderson, M., & Butts, D. (1993). Relationship between teacher intentions and their classroom use of Superscience.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawley F., & Arditzoglow, S. (1990). A descriptive study of alternative life and physical science conceptions of preservice elementary teachers.National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, Ga, Abstracts.Google Scholar
  7. Fraser-Abder, P. (1989). Participation in a curriculum development model and its effect on teacher attitude towards science teaching.School Science and Mathematics, 89, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuller, F., Pilgrim, G., & Freeland, A. (1967). Intensive Individualization of Teacher Preparation. In ASTYearbook of Mental Health and Teacher Education, Chapter VII.Google Scholar
  9. Ginns, I., & Watters, J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understandings of preservice elementary teacher education students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koballa, T., Butts, D., & Riley, J. (1995). An evaluation model with participant constructed components.National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, Abstracts.Google Scholar
  11. Koballa, T., & Coble C. (1979). Effect of introducing producing practical applications on the preservice elementary teacher’s attitude toward teaching science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lederman, N., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ conception of subject matter and pedagogy.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 124–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Linn, M. (1987). Establishing a base for science education: challenges trends and recommendations.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. National Science Teachers Association. (1983). Board of Directors Minutes, Dallas TX, NSTA Board Meeting.Google Scholar
  15. Piper, M. (1977). The investigation of attitude changes of elementary preservice teachers in a competency based, field-oriented science methods course. In M. Piper & K. Moore (Eds.),Attitudes Toward Science Investigations. Columbus Ohio, SMEAC.Google Scholar
  16. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gentzob, W. (1982). Accommodation of a science conception: towards a theory of conceptual change.Science Education, 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Riley, J. (1979). The influence of hands-on science process training on preservice teacher’s acquisition of process skills and attitudes toward science and science teaching.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shapley, K., & Luttrell, D. (1992). Effectiveness of mentor training of elementary colleague teachers.Journal of Elementary Science Education, 4, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shulman, L. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.)Handbook of Research on Teaching, (3rd Ed., p. 3–36) New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, E., Blakeslee, T., & Anderson, C. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stefanich, G., & Kelsey, K. (1989). Improving science attitudes of preservice elementary teachers.Science Education, 73, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strawitz, B. (1976). The effects of activity-centered elementary education science methods course on attitudes of preservice teachers.National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, Abstracts.Google Scholar
  23. Tigner, P. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school.Science Education, 74, 421–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vitale, M., & Romance, N. (1992). Using video disk instruction in an elementary science methods course: remediating science knowledge deficiencies and facilitating science teaching attitudes.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 915–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • David P. Butts
    • 1
  • Thomas R. Koballa
    • 1
  • Thomas D. Elliott
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science EducationThe University of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations