Introduction. The psychology of student learning

  • Noël Entwistle
  • Ference Marton


Student Learning Deep Approach Academic Environment Surface Approach Study Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Biggs, J. B. (1987).Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  2. Entwistle, N. J. (1984). Contrasting perspectives on learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Housell & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.),The Experience of Learning (pp. 1–18). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Entwistle, N. J. (1987). A model of the teaching-learning process. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.).Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 13–28). London: S. R. H. E./Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Entwistle, N. J. & Ramsden, P. (1983).Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  5. Entwistle, N. J. & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and perceptions of the learning environment.Higher Education (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Greeno, J. G. (1988). A perspective on thinking.American Psychologist (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Marton, F. (1976). What does it take to learn? Some implications of an alternative view of learning. In N. J. Entwistle (Ed.),Strategies for Research and Development in Higher Education (pp. 32–43). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  8. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us.Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography and «The art of teaching all things to all men». Research Report. University of Gothenburg: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  10. Marton, F., Hounsell, D. J., & Entwistle, N. J. (1984) (Eds.).The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.),The Experience of Learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, C. M. L. & Parlett, M. R. (1974).Up to the Mark: A Study of the Examination Game. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.Google Scholar
  13. Parlett, M. R. & Hamilton, D. (1977). Evaluation as illumination. In D. Hamliton et al. (Eds.),Beyond the Numbers Game (pp. 9–15). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Perry, W. G. (1970).Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Ramsden, P. (Ed.) (1988).Improving Learning: New Perspectives. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  16. Schmeck, R. R. (1983). Learning styles of college students. In R. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck (Eds.),Individual Differences in Cognition (pp. 115–124). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, Portugal/ Springer Netherlands 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noël Entwistle
    • 1
  • Ference Marton
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghGreat Britain
  2. 2.Department of Education and Educational ResearchUniversity of GöteborgMölndalSweden

Personalised recommendations