Attitudes to peer review as a competence assurance structure — results of a survey of Irish physicians
The Medical Council in Ireland is currently implementing Competence Assurance Structures (CAS). Peer review has been proposed as a tool to measure physician competence.
To assess the attitudes of physicians working in the Irish healthcare system to a peer review programme of competence assurance priorto its implementation.
A postal survey was sent to all physicians in the Irish Medical Directory in November 2003. Nine questions were asked to gauge attitudes to peer review as a CA tool.The returned questionnaires were collated and data extracted based on responses.
The response rate was 67%. The majority of respondents (92%) felt peer review would inform competence assurance in Ireland. Most physicians who were surveyed felt an on-site assessment (88%) every 5 years (87%) was the preferred method. Over 30% responded that there should be a financial incentive for completing a review, and 70% would pay to be assessed.The UK model of competence assurance was the model most physicians preferred for the Irish setting (42%).
The majority of physicians practising in Ireland would favour a peer review system of competence assurance.The financial implications, and structure, of such a system would need to be explored prior to implementation.
Keywordscompetence assurance peer review
- 1.Competence Assurance Structures-An Agenda for Implementation. Irish Medical Council, Dublin, March 2002.Google Scholar
- 2.Fox RD, Mazmanian PE, Putnam RW, eds. Change and learning in the lives of physicians. New York: Praegar, 1989.Google Scholar
- 4.Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD000259. Review. PMID: 12917891 [PubMed -indexed forMEDLINE]Google Scholar
- 8.http://www.medicalcouncil.ie/assurance/default.aspGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hunter N. Actual CA cost 75 euro per doctor p.a., but real cost priceless, says Medical Council.Irish Medical News 2003; 20(33):1Google Scholar