Abstract
Computer Analysis of Mammography Phantom Images (CAMPI) is a method for making quantitative measurements of image quality. This article reports on a recent application of this method to a prototype full-field digital mammography (FFDM) machine. Images of a modified ACR phantom were acquired on the General Electric Diagnostic Molybdenum Rhodium (GE-DMR) FFDM machine at a number of x-ray techniques, both with and without the scatter reduction grid. The techniques were chosen so that one had sets of grid and non-grid images with matched doses (200 mrads) and matched gray-scale values (1500). A third set was acquired at constant 26 kVp and varying mAs for both grid conditions. Analyses of the images yielded signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), contrast and noise corresponding to each target object, and a nonuniformity measure. The results showed that under conditions of equal gray-scale value the grid images were markedly superior, albeit at higher doses than the non-grid images. Under constant dose conditions, the non-grid images were slightly superior in SNR (7%) but markedly less uniform (60%). Overall, the grid images had substantially greater contrast and superior image uniformity. These conclusions applied to the whole kVp range studied for the Mo-Mo target filter combination and 4 cm of breast equivalent material of average composition. These results suggest that use of the non-grid technique in digital mammography with the GE-DMR-FFDM unit, is presently not warranted. With improved uniformity correction procedure, this conclusion would change and one should be able to realize a 14% reduction in patient dose at the same SNR by using a non-grid technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Feig SA, Yaffe MJ: Current Status of Digital Mammography. Semin Ultrasound, CT and MR 17:424–43, 1996
Eckert MP, Chakraborty DP: Quantitative Analysis of Phantom Images in Mammography. Proc SPIE 2167:887–899, 1994.
Chakraborty DP, Eckert MP: Quantitative versus Subjective Evaluation of Mammography Phantom Images. Med Phys 22:133–143, 1995
Chakraborty DP: Physical measures of image quality in mammography. Proc SPIE 2708:179–193, 1996
Chakraborty DP: Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI). Proc SPIE 3032:292–299, 1997
Chakraborty DP: Computer Analysis of Mammography Phantom Images (CAMPI): An Application to the Measurement of Microcalcification Image Quality of Directly Acquired Digital Images. Med Phys 24:1269–1277, 1997
Chakraborty DP, Fatouros PP: An Application of CAMPI Methodology: Comparison of two Digital Biopsy Machines. Proc SPIE 3336:618–628, 1998
Motz JW, Danos M: Image information content and patient exposure. Med Phys 5:8–22, 1978
Muntz EP, Welkowsky, Kaegl E, et al: Optimization of electrostatic imaging systems for minimum patient dose or minimum exposure in mammography. Radiology 127:517–523, 1978
Muntz EP, Jafroudi H, Jennings R, et al: An approach to specifying a minimum dose system for mammography using multiparameter optimization techniques. Med Phys 12:5–12, 1985
Muntz EP: Analysis of the significance of scattered radiation in reduced dose mammography, including magnification effects, scatter suppression, and focal spot and detector blurring. Med Phys 6:110–117, 1979
Jennings RJ, Quinn PW, Gagne RM, et al: Evaluation of x-ray sources for mammography. SPIE 1896:259–268, 1993
Williams MB, Fajardo LL: Digital Mammography: Performance considerations and current detector designs. Acad Radiol 3:429–37, 1996
Liu H, Fajardo LL, Barrett JR, et al: Contrast-detail detectability analysis: Comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system. Acad Radiol 4:197–203, 1997
Court LE, Speller R: A multiparameter optimization of digital mammography: Phys Med Biol 40:1841–1861, 1995
Hendrick RE, Bassett L, Botsco MA, et al: Mammography Quality Control Manual. American Cancer Society, American College of Radiology, 1994 (revised ed.)
Wu X, Barnes GT, Tucker DM: Spectral Dependence of Glandular Tissue Dose in Screen-Film Mammography. Radiology 179:143–148, 1991
Gingold EL, Wu X, Barnes GT: Contrast and Dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh and Rh-Rh Target-Filter Combinations in Mammography. Radiology 195:639–644, 1995
Chakraborty DP: Comparison of computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI) with perceived image quality of phantom targets in the ACR phantom. Proc SPIE 3036:160–167, 1997
Fahrig R, Yaffe MJ: A model for optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography. Med Phys 21:1463–1471, 1994
Bushberg JT, Seibert A, Leidholdt EM, et al: The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. Baltimore, MD, Williams and Wilkins, 1994
Seibert J, Boone JM: X-ray scatter removal by deconvolution. Med Phys 15:567–575, 1988
Molloi SY, Mistretta C: Scatter-glare corrections in quantitative dual-energy fluoroscopy. Med Phys 15:289–297, 1988
Wagner RW, Barnes GT, Askins BS: Effect of reduced scatter on radiographic information content and patient exposure: A quantitative demonstration. Med Phys 7:13–18, 1980
Barnes GT, Frey GD. Screen Film Mammography: Imaging Considerations and Medical Physics Responsibilities. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, Wisconsin, 1991, pp 115–134
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Partially supported by US Public Health Service’s Office on Women’s Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract number RFP 282-97-0077.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chakraborty, D.P. The effect of the antiscatter grid on full-field digital mammography phantom images. J Digit Imaging 12, 12–22 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168622
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168622