Abstract
Backround
Anaesthetists are at high risk from blood-borne pathogens. Universal Precautions (UP) include the routine use of appropriate barrier precautions and techniques to reduce the likelihood of exposure to blood, body fluids and tissues that may contain pathogens. The compliance of Irish anaesthetists with these precautions has not been studied.
Aim
To study the attitudes of Irish anaesthetists to Universal Precautions.
Method
A postal questionnaire was sent to 210 anaesthetists currently practising in Ireland. The questionnaire was based on a model used in Australia and New Zealand.
Results
There was a 50% response rate to the survey. Only 15% of respondents had taken a risk history from a patient in the preceding four weeks. Resheathing of needles was commonplace. The effectiveness of hepatitis B immunisation was rarely checked and only 66% of respondents believe implementation of Universal Precautions to be practical.
Conclusion
Irish anaesthetists comply poorly with Universal Precautions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Centers for Disease Control: Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in health care settings. MMWR 1987; 36(suppl 29): 1S.
Centers for Disease Control: Update: Universal precautions for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis virus, and other blood borne pathogens in health care settinp. MMWR 1988; 37: 377–88.
Fahey BJ, Kozial BE, Banks SM et al. Frequency of nonparenteral occupational exposures to blood and body fluids before and after universal precautions training.Am J Med 1991; 90: 145–51.
Occupational exposure to blood borne pathogens — OSHA: Final rale. Federal Register 1991; 56: 64004.
Richards MJ, Jenkins GA, Johnson PDR. Universal Precautions: attitudes of Australian and New Zealand anaesthetists.Med J Aust 1997; 166: 138–40.
Lymer UB, Schutz AA, Isaksson B. A descriptive study of reported blood exposure incidents among healthcare workers in a university hospital in Sweden.J Hosp Infect 1997; 35: 223–35.
Buergler JM, Kim R, Thisted RA, Cohn SJ, Lichtor JL, Roizen MF. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus in surgeons, anesthesiologists and medical students.Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 118–24.
O’Donnell NG, Asbury AJ. The occupational hazard of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B infection. I Perceived risks and preventive measures adopted by anaesthetists: a postal survey.Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 923–8.
Parker MR. The use of protective gloves, the incidence of ampoule injury and the prevalence of hand laceration amongst anaesthetic personnel.Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 726–9.
HSG(93)40: Protecting health care workers and patients from Hepatitis B. Department of Health, PO Box 410, Wetherby U 23 & LN, England.
Report of Advisory Committee on the Health Services Sector to the Health and Safety Authority, Introduction iv, Department of Health, Hawkins House, Dublin.
Gerberding JL, Lewis FR, Schechter WP. Are universal precautions realistic?Surg Clin North Am 1995; 75: 1091.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Rourke, N., Bennett, M., Porter, J. et al. Universal precautions — do Irish anaesthetists comply?. Ir J Med Sci 169, 211–214 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167699
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167699