Effects of random defective rate and imperfect rework process on economic production quantity model



This paper considers the economic production quantity (EPQ) model with a random defective rate and an imperfect rework process. The assumption of perfect quality production condition of the classical EPQ model is unrealistic. Due to process deterioration or other factors, production of defective items is inevitable. This study assumes that the defective rate is a random variable and all items produced are inspected. The imperfect quality items fall into two groups, the repairable and the scrap. The reworking of the repairable defective items starts when the regular production process finishes in each cycle. The rework process is also assumed to be imperfect, with a random scrap rate. Since the scrap items are produced during a production run, it follows that the production cycle length is not a constant. The renewal reward theorem is utilized to cope with the variable cycle length. A mathematical model is developed to minimize the overall costs and to derive the optimal lot size for the imperfect quality EPQ model where shortages are not permitted. A numerical example is provided to demonstrate its practical usage.

Key words

production manufacturing imperfect reworking EPQ production lot size 


  1. [1]
    M. Ben-Daya, The economic production lot-sizing problem with imperfect production processes and imperfect maintenance. Internat. J. Production Economics,76 (2002), 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    T.C.E. Cheng, An economic order quantity model with demand-dependent unit production cost and imperfect production processes. IIE Trans.,23 (1991), 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    S.W. Chiu and Y.P. Chiu, An economic production quantity model with the rework process of repairable defective items. J. Inform, & Optim. Sci.24 (2003), 569–582.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K.J. Chung, Bounds for production lot sizing with machine breakdown. Comput. & Indust. Eng.,32 (1997), 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    P.A. Hayek and M.K. Salameh, Production lot sizing with the reworking of imperfect quality items produced. Production Planning & Control,12, No. 6 (2001), 584–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    H. Lee and M. Rosenblatt, Simultaneous determination of production cycle and inspection schedules in a production system. Management Sci.,33 (1987), 1125–1136.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Nahmias, Production and Operations Analysis (4th Ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin, Inc., 2001.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.S. Osteryoung, E. Nosari, D.E. McCarty and W.J. Reinhart, Use of the EOQ model for inventory analysis. Production and Inventory Management,27 (1986), 39–45.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M.J. Rosenblatt and H.L. Lee, Economic production cycles with imperfect production processes. IIE Trans.,18 (1986), 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M.K. Salameh and M.Y. Jaber, Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. Internat. J. Production Economics,64 (2000), 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. Schwaller, EOQ under inspection costs. Production and Inventory Management,29 (1988), 22.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    E.A. Silver, D.F. Pyke and R. Peterson, Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling (3rd Ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    R.J. Tersine, Principles of Inventory and Materials Management (4th Ed.). PTR Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1994.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Zhang and Y. Gerchak, Joint lot sizing and inspection policy in an EOQ model with random yield. IIE Trans.,22 (1990), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JJIAM Publishing Committee 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Singa Wang Chiu
    • 1
  • Dah-Chuan Gong
    • 2
  • Hui-Ming Wee
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationChaoyang University of TechnologyTaichungTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringChung Yuan Christian UniversityTaoyuan CountyTaiwan

Personalised recommendations