Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia lessons and challenges

  • Chronic Leukemia
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The choice of primary treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia diagnosed in chronic phase has become exceedingly difficult. There is little doubt that allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) can eradicate the leukaemia and that a ‘graf-versus-leukaemia’ effect makes a major contribution to this result; conversely only a minority of patients are eligible for transplant, which still carries an appreciable risk of mortality or protracted morbidity. For the majority of patients interferon-alpha prolongs life to some degree in comparison with hydroxyurea but is associated with considerable toxicity. the newly introduced tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib mesylate (imatinib, Glivec) induces complete haematologic remission in almost all cases and is associated with a very high incidence of cytogenetic response; its capacity to prolong life in comparison with interferon-alpha is not yet established. Here we review some factors that predict survival after non-transplant therapy and after allografting for CML in chronic phase. We consider two contrasting options for managing the newly diagnosed patient and conclude that for the present allogeneic stem cell transplantation soon after diagnosis should continue to be offered as an option for selected patients. Further experience with the use of imatinib as a single agent or in combination with other anti-leukemic agents may alter the picture in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrett AJ, Malkovska V. Graft-versus-leukaemia: understanding and using the allo-immune response to treat haematological malignancies.Brit J Haematol. 1996;93:754–761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huntly B, Reid AG, Bench AJ, et al. Deletions of the derivative chromosome 9 occur at the time of Philadelphia translocation and provide a powerful and independent prognostic indicator in chronic myeloid leukemia.Blood. 2001; 98:1732–1738.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brummendorf TH, Holyoake TL, Rufer N, et al. Prognostic implications of differences in telomere length between normal and malignant cells from patients with chronic myeloid leukemia measured by flow cytometry.Blood. 2000;95:1883–1890.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sokal JE, Cox EB, Baccarani M, et al. Prognostic discrimination in ‘good risk; chronic granulocytic leukemia.Blood. 1984;63:789–799.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasford J, Pfirrmann J, Hehlmann R, et al. A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alfa.J Nat Cancer Inst. 1998;90:850–858.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahon F, Faberes C, Pueyo S, et al. Response at three months is a good predictive factor for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with recombinant interferon-a.Blood. 1998;92:4059–4065.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman JM, Szydlo R, Horowitz, MM, et al. Choice of pretransplant treatment and timing of transplants for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase.Blood. 1993;82:2235–2238.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SJ, Kuntz KM, Horowitz MM, et al. Unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: a decision analysis.Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:1080–1088.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hehlmann R, Hochhaus A, Kolb H-J, et al. Interferon-a before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in chronic myelogenous leukemia does not affect outcome adversely provided it is discontinued at least 90 days before the procedure.Blood. 1999;94:3668–3677.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gratwohl A, Hermans J, Goldman JM, et al. Risk assessment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia before allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation.Lancet. 1998;352:1087–1092.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGlave PB, Shu XU, Wen W, et al. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia: 9 years experience of the National Marrow Donor Program.Blood. 2000;95:2219–2225.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Craddock C, Szydlo RM, Dazzi F, et al. CMV serostatus is a major determinant of outcome after T-depleted unrelated donor transplant in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: the case for tailored GVHD prophylaxis.Brit J Haematol. 2001, 112:228–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrett AJ, Childs R. Non myeloablative stem cell transplants.Brit J Haematol. 2000;111:6–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Champlin RE, Khouri I, Shimoni A, et al. Harnessing graftversus-malignancy: non-myeloablative preparative regimens for allogeneic haematopoietic transplantation, an evolving strategy for adoptive immunotherapy.Brit J Haematol. 2000;111:18–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, et al. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of BCR-ABL positive cells.Nature Medicine. 1996;2:561–566.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Druker BJ, Talpaz M, Resta DJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia.New Engl J Med. 2001;344:1031–1037.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kantarjian H, Sawyers C, Hochhaus A, et al. Hematologic and cytogenetic responses to imatinib mesylate in chronic myelogenous leukemia.New Engl J Med. 2002;346:645–652.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hochhaus A, Reiter A, Saussele S, et al. Molecular heterogeneity in complete cytogenetic responders after interferon-a therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia: low levels of minimal residual disease are associated with continuing remission.Blood. 2000;95:62–66.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldman JM, Druker BJ. Chronic myeloid leukemia: current treatment options.Blood. 2001:98:2039–2042.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Goldman, J.M. Treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia lessons and challenges. Int J Hematol 76 (Suppl 2), 189–192 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165116

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03165116

Keywords

Navigation