Advertisement

Annals of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 85–88 | Cite as

Technetium-99m pyrophosphate tomogram of nontransmural myocardial infarction: a case report

  • Chinori Kurata
Case Report

Keywords

Acute Myocardial Infarction Transmural Infarction 201T1 Activity Subendocardial Infarction Stannous Pyrophosphate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Willerson JT, Parkey RW, Bonte FJ, et al: Acute subendocardial myocardial infarction in patients: its detection by technetium 99-m stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigrams.Circulation 51: 436–441, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Willerson JT, Parkey RW, Bonte FJ, et al: Technetium stannous pyrophosphate myocardial scintigrams in patients with chest pain of varing etiology.Circulation 51: 1046–1052, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Massie BM, Botvinick EH, Werner JA, et al: Myocardial scintigraphy with technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate: an insensitive test for nontransmural myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol 43: 186–192, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Codini MA, Turner DA, Battle WE, et al: Value and limitations of technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate in the detection of acute myocardial infarction.Am Heart J 98: 752–762, 1979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corbett JR, Lewis M, Willerson JT, et al:99mTc- pyrophosphate imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction: comparison of planar imaging with single-photon tomography with and without blood pool overlay.Circulation 69: 1120–1128, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tamaki N, Mukai T, Ishii Y, et al: Clinical evaluation of99mTc-pyrophosphate myocardial emission computed tomography: comparison with planar imaging.Eur J Nucl Med 9: 106–111, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holman BL, Goldhaber SZ, Kirsch C-M, et al: Measurement of infarct size using single photon emission computed tomography and technetium-99m pyrophosphate: A description of the method and comparison with patient prognosis.Am J Cardiol 50: 503–511, 1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Corbett JR, Lewis SE, Wolfe CL, et al: Measurement of myocardial infarct size by technetium pyrophosphate single-photon tomography.Am J Cardiol 54: 1231–1236, 1984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spodick DH: Q-wave infarction versus S-T infarction: nonspecificity of electrocardiographic criteria for differentiating transmural and nontransmural lesions.Am J Cardiol 51: 913–915, 1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parkey RW, Bonte FJ, Stokely EM, et al: Acute myocardial infarction imaged with99mTc-stannous pyrophosphate and201T1: a clinical evaluation.J Nucl Med 17: 771–779, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berger HJ, Gottschalk A, Zaret BL: Dual radionuclide study of acute myocardial infarction: comparison of thallium-201 and technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate imaging in man.Ann Intern Med 88: 145–154, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prigent F, Maddahi J, Garcia EV, et al: Quantification of myocardial infarct size by thallium-201 single- photon emission computed tomography: experimental validation in the dog.Circulation 74: 852–861, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schofer J, Spielmann RP, Bromel T, et al: Thallium-201/technetium-99m pyrophosphate overlap in patients with acute myocardial infarction after thrombolysis: Prediction of depressed wall motion despite thallium uptake.Am Heart J 112: 291–295, 1986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Nemoto Y, et al: The dual energy myocardial SPECT of99mTc-PYP and201T1C1 for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.Jpn J Nucl Med (KAKUIGAKU) 22: 1545–1549, 1985Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chinori Kurata

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations