Applied Magnetic Resonance

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 357–365 | Cite as

Dense fluid displacement in wet porous media by spin relaxation selective contrast

  • C. Casieri
  • C. De Angelis
  • F. De Luca
  • G. Garreffa
  • B. Maraviglia


Low field Magnetic Resonance Imaging is used to study oil diffusion in a wet soil model. A complete discrimination between oil and water has been obtained by using Inversion-Recovery pulse sequence. The time evolution of the oil image gives the parameters which describe the dense fluid diffusion rate in the whole space directions.


Porous Medium Immiscible Fluid Paramagnetic Impurity Water Magnetization Zeeman Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Mendelson K.S.: Magn. Res. Imag.9, 651–655 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Birkinshaw C., Buggy M., Dally S.: Polymer Comm.28, 286–288 (1987)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Korsemeyer R.W., Lustig S.R., Peppas N.A.: J. Polymer Science24, 395–408 (1986)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Williams J.L.A., Taylor D.G., Maddinelli G., Enwere P., Archer J.S.: Magn. Res. Imag.9, 767–773 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Guillot G., Trokiner A., Saint-Jalmes H.: J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.22, 1646–1649 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hall L.D., Rajanayagam V.: J Magn. Res.89, 470–476 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Horsfield M.A., Hall C., Hall L.D.: J. Magn. Res.87, 319–330 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Stauffer D.: Introduction to Percolation Theory. London and Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis 1985.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Chiesa G.: Inquinamento delle Acque Sotterranee Milano: Hoplei 1988.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Casieri C., De Angelis C., Garreffa G., De Luca F., Maraviglia B.: Magn. Res. Imag.10, 837–841 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Kumar A., Welti D., Ernst R.R.: J. Magn. Res.18, 69–83 (1975)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Mansfield P., Morris P.G.: Adv. in Magn. Res. (supp. 2), New York: Academic Press 1982.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hall L.D., Rajanayagam V.: J. Magn. Res.74, 139–146 (1987)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Dechter J.J., Komoroski R.A., Ramaprasad S.: J. Magn. Res.93, 142–150 (1991)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Baldwin B.A., Yamanashi W.S., Lester P.D.: Magn. Res. Imag.3, 180–181 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Maerefat N.L., Palmer I., Yamanashi W.S., Lester P.D.: Magn. Res. Imag.4, 122 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Dallad G., Thorkildsen G., Hansen E.W.: Proceedings 10th AMPERE Summer School, pp. 310–311. Portoroz 1988.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mendelson K.S., Cohen M.H.: J. Appl. Phys.53, 1127–1135 (1982)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Lipsikas M., Banavar J.R., Willemsen J.: Appl. Phys. Lett.48, 1544–1545 (1986)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Kleimberg R.L., Horsfield M.A.: J. Magn. Res.88, 9–19 (1990)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Banavar J.R., Schwartz L.M. in: Molecular Dynamics in Restricted Geometries (Klafter J., Drake J.M., eds.), pp. 273–309. Wiley 1989.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Halperin W., D’Orazio F., Bhattacharja S. Taczon J.C. in: Molecular Dynamics in Restricted Geometries (Klafter J. Drake J.M., eds.), pp. 311–350. Wiley 1989.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Mendelson K.S.: J. Electroh. Soc.133, 631–633 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Casieri
    • 1
  • C. De Angelis
    • 1
  • F. De Luca
    • 1
  • G. Garreffa
    • 1
  • B. Maraviglia
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FisicaUniversità “La Sapienza”RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations