Applied Magnetic Resonance

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 15–39 | Cite as

Analysis of anisotropic hyperfine interaction distributions in two-dimensional four- and five-pulse electron spin echo envelope modulation spectra of protons in single crystals

  • A. Pöppl
  • R. Böttcher
  • G. Völkel


The effect of the distribution of anisotropic hyperfine interaction on the cross peak line shape of protons in single crystal two-dimensional four-pulse electron spin echo envelope modulation spectra are discussed. The inclusion of an additional mixing pulse in the evolution period of the four-pulse sequence allows the simultaneous measurement of cross and sum peaks in a two-dimensional experiment. The sum peaks directly map the distribution of the anisotropic hyperfine interaction. As an experimental example the hyperfine interaction parameter distribution of protons localzed in hydrogen bonds of a mixed single crystal betaine phosphate/betaine phosphite is examined.


Cross Peak Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation HYSCORE Spectrum Electron Spin Echo Envelope Modulation Spectrum Nuclear Larmor Frequency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Schweiger A.: Angew. Chem.103, 223 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Ernst R.R., Bodenhausen G., Wokaum A. in: Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1987.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Schweiger A. in: Modern Pulsed and Continuous-Wave Electron Spin Resonance (Kevan L., Bowman M.K., eds.), pp. 43–118, New York: Wiley 1990.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Merks R.J.J., De Beer R.: J. Phys. Chem.81, 3319 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Song R., Zhong Y.C., Noble C.J., Pilbrow J.R., Hutton D.R.: Chem. Phys. Lett.237, 86 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Höfer P., Grupp A., Nebenführ H., Mehring M.: Chem. Phys. Lett.132, 279 (1986)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Pöppl A., Simon J., Völkel G.: Appl. Magn. Reson.6, 455 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Reijerse E.J., Shane J.J., De Boer E., Höfer P., Collison D. in: Electron Magnetic Resonance of Disordered Systems II (Yordanov N.D., ed.), pp. 253–257. Singapore: World Scientific 1991.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Shane J.J., Höfer P., Reijerse E.J., de Boer E.: J. Magn. Reson.99, 956 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Höfer P.: J. Magn. Reson. A111, 77 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ponti A., Schweiger A.: J. Chem. Phys.102, 5207 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Dikanov S.A., Bowman M.K.: J. Magn. Reson. A116, 125 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Käss H., Rauther J., Bönigk B., Höfer P., Lubitz W.: J. Phys. Chem.99, 435 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kofmann V., Farver O., Pecht I., Goldfarb D.: J. Am. Chem. Soc.118, 1201 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Pöppl A., Kevan L.: J. Phys. Chem.100, 3387 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Pöopl A., Böttcher R., Völkel G.: J. Magn. Reson. A120, 214 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hoffmann E.C., Hubrich M., Schweiger A.: J. Magn. Reson. A117, 16 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Tyryskhin A.M., Dikanov S.A., Goldfarb D.: J. Magn. Reson. A105, 271 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Hutton S.L., Fehst J., Bohmer R., Braune M., Mertz B., Luckenheimer P., Loidl A.: Phys. Rev. Lett.66/15, 1990 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Bauch H., Bottcher R., Volkel G.: Phys. stat. sol. (b)178, K39 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Pöppl A., Völkel G., Metz H., Klöpperpieper A.: phys. stat. sol. (b)184, 471 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Gemperle C., Schweiger A.: Chem. Rev.91, 1481 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Gemperle C.: Thesis No. 9192, ETH, Zürich 1990.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Gemperle C., Aebli G., Schweiger A., Ernst R.R.: J. Magn. Reson.88, 241 (1990)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Santos M.L., Azevedo J.C., Almeida A., Chaves M.R., Müser H.E., Klöpperpieper A.: Ferroelectrics108, 363 (1990)Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Fehst I., Paasch V., Hutton V., Braune M., Böhmer R., Loidl A., Dorffel M., Narz Th., Haussühl S., McIntyre G.J.: Ferroelectrics138, 1 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Sobiestiankas R., Grigas J., Czapla Z., Dacko S.: phys. stat. sol (a)136, 223 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Hubrich M., Jeschke G., Schweiger A.: J. Chem. Phys.104, 2172 (1996)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Pöppl
    • 1
  • R. Böttcher
    • 1
  • G. Völkel
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakultät für Physik und Geowissenschaften, Institut für Experimentelle Physik IIUniversität LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations