, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 658–668 | Cite as

Chronology of the spread of tamarisk in the central Rio Grande

  • Benjamin L. Everitt


Like many dryland rivers of the southwestern United States, the central Rio Grande suffered a collapse of its native cottonwood forests and an expansion of tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) in the early 20th century. A paramount example of an opportunistic colonizer, tamarisk occupied land made available by the plow, the bulldozer, and the shrinking of a channel depleted of flow by upstream water development. Changes in both the physical environment and the native vegetation were well underway by the time tamarisk became widespread. There is no evidence that it actively displaced native species nor that it played an active role in changing the hydraulic or morphologic properties of the river. Its present dominance in the Presidio Valley is due to the chance conjunction in 1942 of a large summer flood, a seed source, and declining cotton prices that fostered abandonment of farm fields. The history of tamarisk on the central Rio Grande demonstrates the complex nature of vegetation change. The passive role of tamarisk in landscape change holds the hope that its response to geomorphic and hydrographic variables can be understood and predicted.

Key Words

tamarisk vegetation change water development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ainsworth, C.M. and F.P. Brown. 1933. Report on the changes in regimen of the Rio Grande in the valleys below since construction of Elephant Butte Dam, 1917–1932. Report to the International Boundary Commission, El Paso, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Allred, T.M. and J.C. Schmidt. 1997. Channel narrowing of the Green River near Green River, Utah: History, rates, and processes of narrowing. Geological Society of America. Annual Meeting Program with abstract.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, B.R. 1967. Introduced and naturalized tamarisks in the United States and Canada. Quarterly Journal Horticultural Taxonomy 15:19–25.Google Scholar
  4. Brock, J.H. 1994.Tamarix spp. (Salt Cedar), an invasive exotic woody plant in arid and semi-arid riparian habitats of western U.S.A. Chapter 4.In L.C. deWaal, L.E. Child, P.M. Wade, and J.H. Brock, Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Bryan. K. and G.M. Post. 1927. Erosion and control of silt on the Rio Puerco, New Mexico. Report to the chief engineer, Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District. Albuquerque, NM, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Burkham, D.E. 1976. Hydraulic effects of changes in bottom-land vegetation on three major floods, Gila River in southeastern Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 655-J.Google Scholar
  7. Burkham, D.E. 1972. Channel changes of the Gila River at Safford Valley, Arizona. 1846–1970. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 655-G.Google Scholar
  8. Collier, M., R.H. Webb, and J.C. Schmidt. 1996. Dams and Rivers. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1126.Google Scholar
  9. Everitt, B.L. In press. The Rio Grande.In Natural area survey of the Quitman Mountains. Texas. LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Everitt, B.L. 1977. Historical Background. Chapter V.In C.A. Johnson. A preliminary appraisal of cultural and historical resources found along the Rio Grande between Fort Quitman and Haciendita, Texas. University of Texas El Paso Centennial Museum Publication in Anthropology 5:21–25.Google Scholar
  11. Everitt, B.L. 1980. Ecology of salt cedar—a plea for research. Environmental Geology 3:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Everitt, B.L. 1993. Channel responses to deelining flow on the Rio Grande between Fort Quitman and Presidio, Texas. Geomorphology 6:225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman, J.M., W.R. Osterkamp, and W.R. Lewis, Jr. 1996. The role of bed-level fluctuations in the process of channel narrowing. Geomorphology 14:341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graf, W.L. 1982. Tamarisk and river-channel management. Environmental Management 6:283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graf, J.B., R.H. Webb, and R. Hereford, 1991. Relation of sediment load and flood-plain formation to climatic variability. Paria River drainage basin, Utah and Arizona. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 103:1405–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregg, J.E. 1933. The history of Presidio County M.S. Thesis. University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, D.R. 1966. Recent plant invasions in the arid and semiarid southwest of the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers; 56:408–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horgan, P. 1954. Great River. Holt Rinehart and Winston. New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Horton, J.S. and C.J. Campbell. 1974. Management of phreatophyte and riparian vegetation for maximum multiple-use values. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper RM-117.Google Scholar
  20. IBC 1929. International Boundary Commission Minute 113, El Paso, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  21. IBWC, 1956. Flow of the Rio Grande and related Data, 1889–1955. International Boundary and Water Commission, El Paso, TX, USA. Summary Water Bulletin No. 1.Google Scholar
  22. IBWC. 1978. Environmental statement, boundary preservation project. International Boundary and Water Commission, El Paso, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Lawson, L.M. 1925. Effects of Rio Grande storage on river erosion and deposition. Engineering News-record 95:372–374.Google Scholar
  24. Lawson, L.M. 1936. Stabilizing the Rio Grande. Scientific American 155:66–68.Google Scholar
  25. LeSeur, H. 1945. The ecology of the vegetation of Chihuahua, Mexico, north of parallel twenty–eight. University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA, Publication, No. 4521.Google Scholar
  26. Luxan, D.P. de 1583. Expedition into New Mexico made by Antonio de Espejo, 1582–1583. Translated with introduction and notes by George Hammond and Agapito Rey. 1929. The Quivera Society, Los Angeles, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Mahoney, J.M. and S.B. Rood. 1993. A model for assessing the effects of altered river flows on the recruitment of riparian cottonwood. p. 228–232.In Riparian Management: common threads and shared interests. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-226.Google Scholar
  28. Metealfe, O. 1903. The flora of the Mesilla Valley. M.S. Thesis. New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanical Arts, Mesilla Park, NM, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Mueller, J.E. 1975. Restless River. Texas Western Press. El Paso, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Robinson, T.W. 1965. Introduction, spread, and aerial extent of saltcedar. (Tamarix) in the western states. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 491-A.Google Scholar
  31. Scott, M.L., J.M. Friedman, and G.T. Auble. 1996. Fluvial process and the establishment of bottornland trees. Geomorphology 14:327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schumm, S.A. and R.W. Lichty. 1963. Channel widening and flood plain construction along Cimarron River in southwestern Kansas. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 352-D.Google Scholar
  33. Sonnichsen, C.L. 1968. Pass of the North. Texas Western Press, El Paso, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Zelis, A.V.R. de 1751. Testimonio de los autos del reconocimiento fecho, Rio Avajo de el Norte, desde el expresado rio hasta las misiones de la junta de dicho-rio, y el Conchos. Archivo General de Indias, Audencia de Guadalajara, 136-Sig. antigua-67-3-30. Transcript on microfilm. El Paso Centernnial, Museum, University of Texas, El Paso, TX, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin L. Everitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Utah Division of Water ResourcesSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations