Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 383–393 | Cite as

Invertebrate communities of forested limesink wetlands in southwest Georgia, USA: Habitat use and influence of extended inundation

  • Stephen W. Golladay
  • Brad W. Taylor
  • Brian J. Palik
Article

Abstract

Limesink wetlands are a common aquatic habitat in southwest Georgia, USA. These wetlands are non-alluvial, occupying shallow depressions formed from dissolution of limestone bedrock and collapse of surface sands. They are seasonally inundated, with a typical hydroperiod extending from late February to early July. Little is known about factors influencing invertebrate community structure in limesink wetlands. Recently, it has been suggested that regular inundation and drying are important influences on community structure in some seasonal wetlands. We had an opportunity to examine this hypothesis in 3 forested limesink wetlands. Quantitative samples of invertebrates were taken monthly on benthic and wood surfaces from March 1994 through July 1995. This included a period of unusually heavy precipitation, summer and autumn of 1994, when the wetlands would normally be dry. Immediately following inundation, benthic samples were dominated by amphipods (Crangonyx sp.), isopods (Caecidotea sp.), cladocerans, and copepods. Maximum total densities (1000–4000 individuals per m2) were observed within 3 months of inundation. During summer and autumn, densities decreased (< 500 individuals per m2), and the benthos was dominated by larval chironomids. Wood surfaces were dominated by chironomids, with greatest densities (1000–3000 individuals per m2) observed in summer and autumn. Although not quantified, freshwater sponge became very abundant on wood surfaces during autumn. During the following spring (1995), invertebrate densities on sediments remained low, and few amphipods, isopods, cladocerans, or copepods were collected. Chironomids remained very abundant on wood. Our results suggest that extended inundation is a disturbance to some elements of wetland invertebrate communities. Extended inundation may cause short-term reductions in populations by eliminating summer refugia (amphipoda, isopoda) or by altering environmental cues necessary for the completion of life cycles (cladocerans, copepods).

Key Words

wetlands invertebrates community structure wood extended hydroperiod southwest Georgia 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Allard, D. J. 1990. Southeastern United States Ecological Community Classification, Interim Report, Version 1.2. The Nature Conservancy, Southeast Regional Office, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Batzer, D. P. and S. A. Wissinger. 1996. Ecology of insect communities in nontidal wetlands. Annual Review of Entomology 41:75–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, B. F. and D. D. Arden. 1983. Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Dougherty Plain, Southwest Georgia. Scutheastern Geological Society, Tallahassee, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Benke, A. C., R. L. Henry III, D. M. Gillespie, and R. J. Hunter. 1985. Importance of snag habitat for animal production in southeastern stream. Fisheries 10:8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler, M. G. and D. H. Anderson. 1990. Cohort structure, biomass, and production of a merovoltineChironomus population in a Wisconsin bog lake. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9:180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Day, F. P. Jr. 1979. Litter accumulation in four plant communities in the Dismal Swamp, Virginia. The American Midland Naturalist 102:281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodd, C. K. 1992. Biological diversity of a temporary pond herpetofauna in north Florica sandhills. Biodiversity and Conservation 1:125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodd, C. K. 1995. Reptiles and amphibians in the endangered longleaf pine ecosystem. p. 129–131.In E. T. LaRoe, G. S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M. J. Mac (eds.). Our Living Resources: A Report to the Nation on the Distribution, Abundance, and Health of U.S. Plants, Animals, and Ecosystems, U.S. Department of Interior—National Biological Service. Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Duffy, W. G. and D. J. LaBar. 1994. Aquatic invertebrate production in southeastern USA wetlands during winter and spring. Wetlands 14:88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gladden, J. E. and L. A. Smock. 1990. Macroinvertebrate distribution and production on the floodplains of two lowland headwater streams. Freshwater Biology 24:533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halpern, C. B. 1988. Early successional pathways and the resistance and resilience of forest communities. Ecology 69:1703–1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hax, C. L. and S. W. Golladay. 1993. Macroinvertebrate colonization and biofilm development on leaves and wood in a boreal river. Freshwater Biology 29:79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, L. R., M. L. Maslia, and W. C. Meeks. 1983. Hydrology and Model Evaluation of the Principal Artesian Aquifer, Dougherty Plain, Southwest Georgia. Georgia Geological Survey Bulletin 97.Google Scholar
  14. Hendricks, E. L. and M. H. Goodwin. 1952. Water-Level Fluctuations in Limestone Sinks in Southwestern Georgia. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1110-E.Google Scholar
  15. Lake, P. S., A. E. Bayly, and D. W. Morton. 1989. The phenology of a temporary pond in western Victoria, Australia, with special reference to invertebrate succession. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 115:171–202.Google Scholar
  16. Lynch, J. M., A. K. Gholson Jr., and W. W. Baker. 1986. Natural Features Inventory of Ichauway Plantation, Georgia: Volume I. The Nature Conservancy Southeast Regional Office. Chapel Hill, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Merritt, R. W. and K. W. Cummins. 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Mitsch, W. J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Neckles, H. A., H. R. Murkin, and J. A. Cooper. 1990. Influences of seasonal flooding on macroinvertebrate abundance in wetland habitats. Freshwater Biology 23:311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. palmer, M. A., P. Arensburger, P. S. Botts, C. C. Hakenkamp, and J. W. Reid. 1995. Disturbance and the community structure of stream invertebrates: patch-specific effects and the role of refugia. Freshwater Biology, 34:343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pennak, R. W. 1989. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Sklar, F. H. 1985. Seasonality and community structure of the backswamp invertebrates in a Louisiana cypress-tupelo wetland. Wetlands 5:69–86.Google Scholar
  23. Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd Edition. W.H. Freeman, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Sutter, R. D. and R. Kral. 1994. The ecology, status, and conservation of two non-alluvial wetland communities in the South Atlantic and Eastern Gulf Coastal Plain, USA. Biological Conservation 68:235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tansey, J. B. and N. D. Cost. 1990. Estimating the forested-wetland resource in the southeastern United States with forest survey data. Forest Ecology and Management, 33/34:193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor, B. E., R. A. Estes, J. H. K. Pechmann, and R. D. Semlitsch. 1988. Trophic relations in a temporary pond: larval salamanders and their microinvertebrate prey. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:2191–2198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, B. E., D. L. Mahoney, and R. A. Estes. 1989. Zooplankton production in a carolina bay. p. 425–435.In R. R. Sharitz and J. W. Gibbons (eds.) Freshwater Wetlands and Wildlife. USDOE Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Thorp, J. H., E. M. McEwan, M. F. Flynn, and F. R. Hauer. 1985. Invertebrate colonization of submerged wood in a Cypress-Tupelo swamp and blackwater stream. The American Midland Naturalist 113:56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Torak, L. J., G. S. Davis, G. A. Strain, and J. G. Herndon. 1991. Geohydrology and evaluation of water-resource potential of the upper Floridan Aquifer in the Albany area, Southwest Georgia. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 91–52.Google Scholar
  30. Watson, G. F., M. Davies, and M. J. Tyler. 1995. Observations on temporary waters in northwestern Australia. Hydrobiologia 299:53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Webster, J. R., J. B. Waide, and B. C. Patten. 1975. Nutrient recycling and the stability of ecosytems. p 1–27.In F. G. Howell, J. B. Gentry, and M. H. Smith (eds.) Mineral Cycling in Southeastern Ecosystems, ERDA Symposium Series Conf-740513. Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Wharton, C. H. 1978. The Natural Environments of Georgia. Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Altanta, GA, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Wiggins, G. B., R. J. Mackay, and I. M. Smith. 1980. Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual temporary pools. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie Supplement 58:97–206.Google Scholar
  34. Williams, W. D. 1985. Biotic adaptations in temporary lentic waters, with special reference to those in semi-arid and arid regions. Hydrobiologia 125:85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ziser, S. W. 1978. Seasonal variations in water chemistry and diversity of the phytophilic macroinvertebrates of three swamp communities in southeastern Louisiana. The Southwestern Naturalist 23:545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen W. Golladay
    • 1
  • Brad W. Taylor
    • 1
  • Brian J. Palik
    • 1
  1. 1.J.W. Jones Ecological Research CenterNewtonUSA

Personalised recommendations