Advertisement

Wetlands

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 139–161 | Cite as

A comparison of physicochemical variables across plant zones in a mangal/salt marsh community in Louisiana

  • C. Stuart Patterson
  • Irving A. Mendelssohn
Article

Abstract

Three vegetation zones were delineated in a mangal / salt marsh community at Bay Champagne, Louisiana — a zone dominated byAvicennia germinans adjacent to the bay, an inland zone dominated bySpartina alterniflora, and a transition zone between the two containing both species. Parallel transects that intersected each zone were established perpendicular to the shore of the bay and sampled to determine if these zones differed on the basis of soil texture, elevation, redox potential, and selected interstitial water variables. Redox potential and interstitial water sulfide, ammonium, P, Ca, Mg, K, Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, pH, and salinity were measured 5 times during the year to account for seasonal variation.

Factor analysis identified five factors, accounting for 80.6% of the variation in the data. These factors were interpreted as representing seawater, sulfide, nitrogen/phosphorus, Eh, and copper variables. Factor scores in theAvicennia zone were significantly different than in the other zones for the salinity and sulfide factors, with higher salinity scores and lower sulfide scores.

Analysis of variance revealed highly significant zone differences for most individual variables. TheAvicennia zone was characterized by the highest relative elevation and soil bulk density. Higher concentrations of ions associated with sea water, such as potassium, calcium, and magnesium, occurred in theAvicennia zone, which also caused interstitial water salinity to be higher in that zone.

The transition andSpartina zones were more biochemically reduced than theAvicennia zone, as shown by lower redox potential measurements, higher sulfide concentrations, and higher sulfide factor scores in the former. Iron and manganese were lower in the more reduced zones, probably due to precipitation with sulfide. The transition andSpartina zones only differed in interstitial water potassium and sulfide and relative elevation, with some additional seasonal differences in other variables. TheSpartina zone had a lower elevation and usually higher sulfide concentrations than the transition zone. We hypothesize that the relatively high sulfide and lower elevation of theSpartina zone may limit the establishment ofAvicennia propagules there.

Key Words

Avicennia germinans Spartina alterniflora distribution sulfide elevation redox potential Louisiana species zonation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Ball, M.C. 1980. Pattems of secondary succession in a mangrove forest in south Florida. Oecologia (Berlin) 44:226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradley, P.M. and J.T. Morris. 1990a. Influence of oxygen and sulfide concentration on nitrogen uptake kinetics inSpartina alterniflora. Ecology 71:282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley, P.M. and J.T. Morris. 1990b. Physical characteristics of salt marsh sediments — ecological implications. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 61:245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brannon, J.M. 1973. Seasonal variations of nutrients and physicochemical properties in the salt marsh soils of Barataria Bay, Louisiana. Unpublished M. Sc. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Carlson, P.R. 1983. Pore water chemistry of an overwash mangrove island. Florida Scientist 46:239–248.Google Scholar
  6. Casselman, M.E., W.H. Patrick, Jr., and R.D. DeLaune. 1981. Nitrogen fixation in a Gulf Coast salt marsh. Soil Science Society of America Journal 45:51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chapman, V.J. 1976. Mangrove Vegetation. J. Cramer Publishers, Vaduz, Liechtenstein.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, V.J. 1974. Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World. Interscience Publishers, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, L.D. and N.J. Hannon. 1969. The mangrove swamp and salt marsh communities of the Sydney District II. The holocoenotic complex with particular reference to physiograhy. Journal of Ecology 59:535–553.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, Jr. J.H. 1940. The ecology and geologic role of mangroves in Florida. Papers from Tortugas Laboratory 32:304–412.Google Scholar
  11. Dawes, C.J. 1981. Marine Botany John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  12. DeLaune, R.D., C. J. Smith, and W. H. Patrick, Jr. 1983. Relationship of marsh elevation, redox potential, and sulfide toSpartina alterniflora productivity. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 47:930–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dillon, W.R. and M. Goldstein. 1984. Multivariate Analysis 587 pp. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  14. Feijtel, T.C. 1986. Biogeochemical cycling of metals in Barataria Basin. Ph. D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Feijtel, T.C., R.D. DeLaune and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1988. Seasonal pore water dynamics in marshes of Barataria Basin, Louisiana. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52:59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gambrell, R.P. and W.H. Patrick, Jr. 1978. Chemical and microbiological properties of anaerobic soils and sediments. p. 375–423.In D.D. Hook and R.M.M. Crawford (eds.) Plant Life in Anaerobic Environments. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc. Ann Arbor, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Giblin, A. E. and R.W. Howarth. 1984. Porewater evidence for a dynamic sedimentary iron cycle in salt marshes. Limnology and Oceanography 29:47–63.Google Scholar
  18. Gu, D., N. Iricanin, and J.H. Trefry. 1987. The geochemistry of interstitial water for a sediment core from the Indian River Lagoon, Florida. Florida Scientist 50:99–110.Google Scholar
  19. Hausenbuiller, R.L. 1972. Soil Science Principles and Practices. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  20. Howarth, R.W. and A. Giblin. 1983. Sulfate reduction in the salt marshes of Sapelo Island, Georgia. Limnology and Oceanography 28:70–82.Google Scholar
  21. Johnston, S.A., Jr. 1983. Preliminary report onAvicennia germinans located on Isle de Chien (Dog Island), Franklin Country Florida. Tropical Ecology 24:13–18.Google Scholar
  22. Kangas, P.C. and A. E. Lugo. 1990. The distribution of mangroves and saltmarsh in Florida. Tropical Ecology 31:32–39.Google Scholar
  23. King, G. M., M. J. Klug, R. G. Wiegert, and A. G. Chalmers. 1982. Relation of soil water movement and sulfide concentration toSpartina alterniflora production in a Georgia salt marsh. Science 218:61–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King, G. M., B. L. Howes, and J. W. Dacey. 1985. Short-term endproducts of sulfate reduction in a salt marsh: formation of acid volatile sulfides, elemental sulfur, and pyrite. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 49:1561–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirby, C.J. and J. G. Gosselink. 1976. Primary production in a Louisiana Gulf CoastSpartina alterniflora marsh. Ecology 57:1052–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koch, M. S., I. A. Mendelssohn, and K. L. McKee. 1990. Mechanism for the hydrogen sulfide-induced growth limitation in wetland macrophytes. Limnology and Oceanography 35:399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lazar Research Laboratories, Inc. 1986. Measurements using ISM-146 Micro Ion sensing electrode. Los Angeles, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Lopez-Portillo, J. and E. Ezcurra. 1985. Litter fall ofAvicennia germinans L. in a one-year cycle in a mudflat at the Laguna de Mecoacan, Tabasco, Mexico. Biotropica 17:186–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lugo, A.E. and C.P. Zucca. 1977. The impact of low temperature stress on mangrove structure and growth. Tropical Ecology 18:149–161.Google Scholar
  30. McMillan, C. and C.L. Sherrod. 1986. The chilling tolerance of black mangrove,Avicennia germinans, from the Gulf of Mexico coast of Texas, Louisiana and Florida, Contributions in Marine Science 29:9–16.Google Scholar
  31. Mendelssohn, I.A. 1979. Nitrogen metabolism in the height forms ofSpartina alterniflora in North Carolina. Ecology 60:574–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mendelssohn, I.A., K.L. McKee, and M.T. Postek. 1982. Sublethal stresses controllingSpartina alterniflora productivity. p. 223–242.In B. Gopal, R. E. Tumer, R. G. Wetzel, and D. F. Whigham (eds.) Wetlands: Ecology and Management, Proceedings of the First International Wetlands Conference, New Delhi, India. National Institute of Ecology, Jaipur, and International Scientific Publications, Jaipur, India.Google Scholar
  33. Mendelssohn, I. A. and K. L. McKee. 1988.Spartina alterniflora die-back in Louisiana: time-course investigation of soil waterlogging effects. Journal of Ecology 76:509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Penfound W.T. and E.S. Hathaway. 1938. Plant communities on the marshlands of S.E. Louisiana. Ecological Monographs 8:3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ponnamperuma, F.N. 1972. The chemistry of submerged soils. Advances in Agronomy 24 29–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rabinowitz, D. 1978. Dispersal properties of mangrove propagules. Biotropica 10:47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reimold, R.J. 1972. The movement of phosphorus through the salt marsh cord grassSpartina alterniflora Loisel. Limnology and Oceanography 17:606–611.Google Scholar
  38. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. 1985 Version 5 Edition, SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  39. Sherrod, C.L., D.L. Hockaday, and C. McMillan. 1986. Survival of red mangrove,Rhizophora mangle, on the Gulf of Mexico coast of Texas. Contributions in Marine Science 29:27–36.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, T.J. III. 1987. Effects of seed predators and light level on the distribution ofAvicennia marina (Forsk.) Viern. in tropical, tidal forests. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 25:43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Snedaker, S.C. 1982. Mangrove species zonation: why? p. 111–125.In D.N. Sen and K.S. Rajpurohit (eds.) Tasks for Vegetation Science, Volume 2. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  42. Tabachnick, B.G. and L.S. Fidell. 1983. Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper and Row, Publshers, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Tchemia, P. 1980. Descriptive Regional Oceanography. Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  44. Teas, H.J. 1977. Ecology and restoration of mangrove shorelines in Florida. Environmental Conservation 4:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thom, B.G., 1967. Mangrove ecology and deltatic geomorphology: Tabasco, Mexico. Journal of Ecology 55:301–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. USDA. 1984. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples. Soil Survey Staff, Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1, U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D. C., USA.Google Scholar
  47. US EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. 1979. Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. Cincinnati, OH, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, T.R., J.B. Van Doren, B.R. Smith, S.W. McElvany, and H. Zink. 1986. ICP analysis of biological samples. American Laboratory 18:52–57.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Stuart Patterson
    • 1
  • Irving A. Mendelssohn
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory for Wetland Soils and Sediments Center for Wetland ResourcesLouisiana State UniversityBaton Rouge

Personalised recommendations