Advertisement

Acta Physica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae

, Volume 21, Issue 3–4, pp 345–365 | Cite as

Higher meson resonances in the SU(6) symmetry

  • I. Montvay
  • T. Nagy
Article

Abstract

The mass values of positive parity meson resonances are compared in189 and405 with predictions of simple SU(6) mass formulae. It turns out that the 2+ mesons alone can be assigned to both189 and405. Nevertheless405 seems to be more promising, for it allows to include all well established positive parity mesons.

Keywords

Mass Relation Mass Formula Mass Operator Tensor Operator Jeta 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Высшие мезонные р езонансы в SU(6) симметрии

Резюме

Величина масс мезонных резонансов положительной четности сравнивается в189 и405 с предсказаниями простой массовой формулы SU(6). Оказывается, что оба 189 и 405 определяются самим мезоном 2+. Тем не менее405 проявляет себя более надежным, так как оно может содержать все хорошо известные мезоны положительной четности.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Gatto, L. Maiani andG. Preparata, Nuovo Cimento,39, 1192, 1965.P. N. Bogolyubov, V. A. Matvejev andB. V. Struminsky, JINR Preprint, Dubna, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Gürsey andL. A. Radicati, Phys. Rev. Letters,13, 173, 1964.A. Pais, Phys. Rev. Letters,13, 175, 1964.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. A. Baqi Bég andV. Singh, Phys. Rev. Letters,13, 509, 1964.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. H. Rosenfeld et al., Rev. Mod. Phys.,37, 633, 1965.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Submitted for publication to Nuovo Cimento.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Gürsey, A. Pais andL. A. Radicati, Phys. Rev. Letters,13, 299, 1964.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. K. Kuo andT. Yao, Phys. Rev. Letters,13, 415, 1964.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. A. Baqi Bég andV. Singh, Phys. Rev. Letters,13, 418, 1964.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. N. Achasow, V. G. Kadishevski andR. M. Muradyan, JINR preprint, Dubna, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cha. Hwa Chan andNguyen-Huu Xuong, Preprint of California University, 1965.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O. Robaschik andA. Uhlmann, JINR preprint, Dubna, 1966.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Okubo andN. Mukunda, Rochester preprint, 1965.A. Uhlmann, JINR preprint, Dubna, 1965.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. L. Glashow andR. H. Socolov, Phys. Rev. Letters15, 329, 1965.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Horn, J. J. Coyne, S. Meshkov andJ. C. Carter, preprint.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dao-Wong Duc andPham-Qui Tu, JINR preprint, Dubna, 1965.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Dothan, M. Gell-Mann, andY. Neeman, Phys Letters,17, 148, 1965.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Delbourgo, M. A. Rashid andJ. Stathdee, ICTP preprint, Triest, 1965.Cao Chi, Nguyen van Hieu andB. Sredniava, JINR preprint, Dubna, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© with the authors 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Montvay
    • 1
  • T. Nagy
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Theoretical PhysicsRoland Eötvös UniversityBudapest

Personalised recommendations