Advertisement

A randomised controlled trial of the effect of continuous electronic physiological monitoring on the adverse event rate in high risk medical and surgical patients1)

  • Berry Middel
Wetenschap kritisch bekeken
  • 24 Downloads

Samenvatting

Uit observationeel onderzoek is een lineaire samenhang bekend tussen ziekenhuismortaliteit en het aantal geobserveerde, of elektronisch geregistreerde, signalen van het intreden van een (abnormale) lichamelijke en fysiologische toestand.2-5) Nu zijn dergelijke signalen onvermijdelijk bij stervende patiënten, maar ze dragen ook bij aan de bewaking en adequate interventie in het geval van potentieel letale problemen bij patiënten die een kans hebben om te overleven.

Literatuur

  1. Watkinson PJ, Barber VS, Price JD, Hann A, Tarassenko L, Young D. A randomised controlled trial of the effect of continuous electronic physiological monitoring on the adverse event rate in high risk medical and surgical patients. Anaesthesia 2006; 61:1031-1039 Google Scholar
  2. Goldhill DR, McNarry AF. Physiological abnormalities in early warning scores are related to mortality in adult inpatients. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92:882-884.Google Scholar
  3. Goldhill DR. Preventing surgical deaths: critical care and intensive care outreach services in the postoperative period. Br J Anaesth 2005; 95:88-94.Google Scholar
  4. Jacques T, Harrison GA, McLaws ML, Kilborn G. Signs of critical conditions and emergency responses (SOCCER): a model for predicting adverse events in the inpatient setting. Resuscitation 2006; 69:175-183.Google Scholar
  5. Buist M, Bernard S, Nguyen TV, Moore G, Anderson J. Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study. Resuscitation 2004; 62:137-141.Google Scholar
  6. Buist MD, Jarmolowski E, Burton PR, et al. Recognising clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive care: a pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital. Med J Aust 1999; 171:22-25.Google Scholar
  7. Franklin C, Mathew J. Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrest: analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event. Crit Care Med 1994; 22:244-247.Google Scholar
  8. Hillman KM, Bristow PJ, Chey T, et al. Antecedents to hospital deaths. Intern Med J 2001; 31:343-348.Google Scholar
  9. Sax FL, Charlson ME. Medical patients at high risk for catastrophic deterioration. Crit Care Med 1987; 15:510-515.Google Scholar
  10. Schein RM, Hazday N, Pena M, Ruben BH, Sprung CL. Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Chest 1990; 98:1388-1392.Google Scholar
  11. George AL Jr, Folk BP 3rd, Crecelius PL, Campbell WB. Pre-arrest morbidity and other correlates of survival after inhospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Am J Med 1989; 87:28-34.Google Scholar
  12. Kause J, Smith G, Prytherch D, et al. A comparison of antecedents to cardiac arrests, deaths and emergency intensive care admissions in Australia and New Zealand, and the United Kingdom – the ACADEMIA study. Resuscitation 2004; 62:275-282.Google Scholar
  13. McGloin H, Adam SK, Singer M. Unexpected deaths and referrals to intensive care of patients on general wards. Are some cases potentially avoidable? Journal of the Royal College of Physicians (London) 1999; 33:255-259.Google Scholar
  14. BCC Research. http://www.bccresearch.com/hlc/HLC038B.asp [accessed 1 August 2006].

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berry Middel
    • 1
  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations