Advertisement

Kind en adolescent

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 145–156 | Cite as

Opvoedingsondersteuningen intergenerationele overdracht van gehechtheid

Een overzicht van interventiestudies
  • F. Juffer
  • M. H. van Ijzendoorn
  • M. G. C. Duyvesteyn
Article

Samenvatting

In een overzicht van interventiestudies wordt nagegaan of het geven van opvoedingsondersteuning effect heeft op de sensitiviteit van de opvoeder en op de gehechtheidsrelatie tussen ouder en kind. Geconcludeerd wordt dat interventies effectief zijn, waarbij het effect op de sensitiviteit groter is dan het effect op de gehechtheid. Er zijn studies die positieve effecten laten zien, maar er zijn ook onderzoeken waarbij geen of negatiefe effecten werden gevonden. Dit lijkt verklaard te kunnen worden uit een gebrek aan vergelijkbaarheid van de onderzoeken: deze verschillen sterk qua inhoud en intensiteit van de interventie. De uitkomsten laten zien dat er nog tegenstrijdigheden en lacunes zijn op dit terrein. Ook lijkt de speurtocht naar determinanten van gehechtheid nog niet beëindigd.

attachment intervention intergenerational transmissions 

Notes

Literatuur

  1. Ainsworth, M.D.S., Bell, S.M. & Stayton, D.J. (1974). Infant–mother attachment and social development: Socialization as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In M.P.M. Richards (Ed.), The integration of a child into a social world (pp. 99–135). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Anisfeld, E., Casper, V., Nozyce, M. & Cunningham, N. (1990). Does infant carrying promote attachment? An experimental study of the effects of increased physical contact on the development of attachment. Child Development, 61, 1617–1627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnard, K.E., Magyary, D., Summer, G., Booth, C.L., Mitchell, S.K. & Spieker, S. (1988). Prevention of parenting alterations for women with low social support. Psychiatry, 51, 248–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, B., Blignault, I., Holmes, S., Payne, A. & Parker, G. (1987). Quality of attachment in a sample of 1–year–old Australian children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , 26, 303–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckwith, L. (1988). Intervention with disadvantaged parents of sick preterm infants. Psychiatry, 51, 242–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boom, D.C. van den (1988). Neonatal irritability and the development of attachment: Observation and intervention. Academisch proefschrift, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Leiden.Google Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. (1982, tweede druk). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1). Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Brinich, E., Drotar, D. & Brinich, P. (1989). Security of attachment and outcome of preschoolers with histories of nonorganic failure to thrive. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi–experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  11. Carter, S.L., Osofsky, J.D. & Hann, D.M. (1991). Speaking for the baby: A therapeutic intervention with adolescent mothers and their infants. Infant Mental Health Journal, 12, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1988, herziene druk). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cramer, B., Robert–Tissot, C., Stern, D.N., Serpa–Rusconi, S., De Muralt, M., Besson, G., Palacio–Espasa, F., Bachmann, J.P., Knauer, D., Berney, C. & D’Arcis, U. (1990). Outcome evaluation in brief mother–infant psychotherapy: A preliminary report. Infant Mental Health Journal, 11, 278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egeland, B. & Erickson, M.F. (1993). Attachment theory and findings: Implications for prevention and intervention. In S. Kramer & H. Parens (Eds.), Prevention in mental health: Now, tomorrow, ever? (pp. 21–50). Northvale, NJ; Jason Aronson, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Erickson, M.F., Korfmacher, J. & Egeland, B. (1992). Attachments past and present. Implications for therapeutic intervention with mother–infant dyads. Development and Psychopathology, 4, 495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraiberg, S., Adelson, E. & Shapiro, V. (1975). Ghosts in the nursery: A psychoanalytic approach to the problems of impaired infant–mother relationships. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 14, 387–422.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. George, C., Kaplan, N. & Main, M. (1985). Adult Attachment Interview. Ongepubliceerd manuscript, Universiteit van Californië, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  18. Goldsmith, H.H. & Alansky, J.A. (1987). Maternal and infant temperamental predictors of attachment: A meta–analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 805–816.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobson, S.W. & Frye, K.F. (1991). Effect of maternal social support on attachment: Experimental evidence. Child Development, 62, 572–582.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Juffer, F. (1993). Verbonden door adoptie. Een experimenteel onderzoek naar hechting en competentie in gezinnen met een adoptiebaby. Amersfoort: Academische uitgeverij.Google Scholar
  21. Lambermon, M.W.E. (1991). Video of folder? Korte– en lange–termijn–effecten van voorlichting over vroegkinderlijke opvoeding. Academisch proefschrift, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden, Leiden.Google Scholar
  22. Lambermon, M.W.E. & IJzendoorn, M.H. van (1989). De effecten van voorlichting over vroegkinderlijke opvoeding met video of folder. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Opvoeding, Vorming en Onderwijs, 5, 350–361.Google Scholar
  23. Leifer, M., Croner Wax, L., Leventhal–Belfer, L., Fouchia, A. & Morrison, M. (1989). The use of multitreatment modalities in early intervention: A quantitative case study. Infant Mental Health Journal, 10, 100–116.Google Scholar
  24. Lieberman, A.F., Weston, D.R. & Pawl, J.H. (1991). Preventive intervention and outcome with anxiously attached dyads. Child Development , 62, 199–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lyons–Ruth, K., Connell, D.B. & Grunebaum, H.U. (1990). Infants at social risks: Maternal depression and family support services as mediators of infant development and security of attachment. Child Development , 61, 85–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Main, M., Kaplan, N. & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood. A move to the level of representation. In J. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66–104.Google Scholar
  27. Main, M. & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In M.T. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti & E.M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years. Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 121–161). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Meij, J.Th.H. (1992). Sociale ondersteuning, gehechtheidskwaliteit en vroegkinderlijke competentieontwikkeling. Academisch proefschrift, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
  29. Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta–analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Murray, L. & Cooper, P. (in druk). Clinical application of attachment theory and research: Change in infant attachment with brief psychotherapy. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  31. Rosenthal, R. (1991, herziene druk). Meta–analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Spangler, G. & Grossmann, K.E. (1993). Biobehavioral organization in securely and insecurely attached infants. Child Development , 64, 1439–1450.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Suess, G.J., Grossmann, K.E. & Sroufe, L.A. (1992). Effects of infant attachment to mother and father on quality of adaptation in preschool: From dyadic to individual organisation of self. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waters, E. & Deane, K.E. (1985). Defining and assessing individual differences in attachment relationships: Q–Methodology and the organization of behavior in infancy and early childhood. In J. Bretherton & E. Waters (Red.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66–104.Google Scholar
  35. Wright, B.M. (1986). An approach to infant–parent psychotherapy. Infant Mental Health Journal, 7, 247–263.Google Scholar
  36. IJzendoorn, M.H. van & Bakermans–Kranenburg, M.J. (1994). Intergenerationele overdracht van gehechtheid. De stand van zaken in het psychometrisch, klinisch en pedagogisch onderzoek. Kind en Adolescent, 15, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. IJzendoorn, M.H. van, Goldberg, S., Kroonenberg, P.M. & Frenkel, O.J. (1992). The relative effects of maternal and child problems on the quality of attachment: A meta–analysis of attachment in clinical samples. Child Development, 63, 840–858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. IJzendoorn, M.H. van & Kroonenberg, P.M. (1988). Cross–cultural patterns of attachment: A meta–analysis of the Strange Situation. Child Development, 59, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Juffer
    • 1
  • M. H. van Ijzendoorn
    • 1
  • M. G. C. Duyvesteyn
    • 1
  1. 1.

Personalised recommendations