e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik

, Volume 122, Issue 6, pp 221–224 | Cite as

User-centric evaluation of TCP-friendly congestion control for real-time video transmission

  • M. Welzl


The growing number of TCP-friendly congestion control mechanisms makes it increasingly difficult for designers of adaptive multimedia applications to decide which one to choose. We argue that parameters of existing mechanisms should be evaluated from a user-level perspective and describe how we have undertaken this effort for real-time video transmission.


TCP-friendly congestion control user test streaming video 

Evaluierung gegenüber TCP-fairer Staukontrollverfahren für Echtzeit-Videoübertragung aus Benutzersicht


Die wachsende Zahl TCP-fairer Staukontrollmechanismen macht es für Designer von adaptiven Multimediaanwendungen immer schwieriger zu entscheiden, welcher benutzt werden sollte. Wir behaupten, dass Parameter existierender Mechanismen aus Benutzersicht evaluiert werden sollten und beschreiben, wie wir dies für Echtzeit-Videoübertragung unternommen haben.


TCP-faire Staukontrolle Benutzertest Streaming Video 


  1. AVCS. Available from: Scholar
  2. Bansal, D., Balakrishnan, H. (2001): Binomial congestion control algorithms. IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, April 2001.Google Scholar
  3. Denda, R., Widmer, J., Mauve, M. (2001): A survey on TCP-friendly congestion control. IEEE Network Magazine, Special Issue “Control of Best Effort Traffic”, 15 (3), May 2001.Google Scholar
  4. Dummynet. Available from: dummynet/.Google Scholar
  5. Faris, F., Yegenoglu, F., Qadan, O. (2000): A model for representing wide area Internet packet behaviour. IEEE IPCCC 2000, Feb. 2000.Google Scholar
  6. Handley, M., Floyd, S., Kohler, E. (2004): Datagram congestion control protocol (dccp). Internet-draft draft-ietf-dccp-spec-06.txt (work in progress), Feb. 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Handley, M., Rejaie, R., Estrin, D. (1999): Quality adaptation for congestion controlled video playback over the Internet. ACM SIGCOMM 1999, Cambridge, MA., Sept. 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Handley, M., Rejaie, R., Estrin, D. (1999): Rap: An end-to-end rate-based congestion control mechanism for real-time streams in the Internet. IEEE Infocom 1999, New York, March 1999.Google Scholar
  9. Kim, M. S., Yang, Y. R., Lam, S. S. (2001): Transient behaviours of TCP-friendly congestion control protocols. IEEE INFOCOM 2001, Anchorage, Alaska, April 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Langphear, D. (2002): Dccp user guide. Internet-draft draft-lanphear-dccp-user-guide-00.txt (work in progress), Oct. 2002.Google Scholar
  11. MGEN. Available from: Scholar
  12. NISTNet. Available from: Scholar
  13. Ozdemir, V., Rhee, I., Yi, Y. (2000): Tear: TCP emulation at receivers — flow control for multimedia streaming. Technical Report, Department of Computer Sciences, NCSU, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Padhye, J., Floyd, S., Handley, M., Widmer, J. (2001): Equation-based congestion control for unicast applications. ACM SIGCOMM 2000, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  15. Paxson, V. (1997): Fast, approximate synthesis of fractional Gaussian noise for generating self-similar network traffic. Comp. Comm. Rev. (CCR) 27 (5), Oct. 1997: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paxson, V., Zhang, Y., Shenker, S. (2000): The stationarity of Internet path properties: routing, loss, and throughput. Technical Report ACIRI Technical Report, icir — i.c.s.i. center for Internet research, May 2000.Google Scholar
  17. Sisalem, D., Wolisz, A. (2000): Lda+: A TCP-friendly adaptation scheme for multimedia communication. ICME 2000.Google Scholar
  18. Stummer, G. (2001): Adaptionsmechanismen verteilter Multimedia-Internetanwendungen. Diploma thesis, Johannes-Kepler-University Linz.Google Scholar
  19. Watson, A., Mullin, J., Smallwood L., Wilson, G. M. (2001): New techniques for assessing audio and video quality in real-time interactive communication. IHM-HCI 2001, Lille, France, Sept. 2001.Google Scholar
  20. Yang, Y. R., Lam, S. S. (2000): General aimd congestion control. Technical Report TR-2000-09, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, May 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für InformatikUniversität InnsbruckInnsbruckÖsterreich

Personalised recommendations