Advertisement

Proceedings: Plant Sciences

, Volume 95, Issue 6, pp 357–363 | Cite as

Structure and cytochemistry of the pistil inArachis hypogaea

  • K Venkata Lakshmi
  • K R Shivanna
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

InArachis hypogaea (Papilionoideae, Leguminosae), the stigma is of the dry papillate type. The papillae are multicellular and multiseriate. They are covered with a thin lining of pellicle which responds for proteins, non-specific esterases and acid phosphatases. The style is 3–6 cm long and hollow throughout its length. The stylar canal is bordered by a layer of canal cells. The canal cells in most of the stylar region are not glandular, they are vacuolate with scant cytoplasm. The canal cells at the base of the style, however, are glandular with dense cytoplasm and prominent nuclei. The structural features of the pistil ofArachis are discussed with those of other Papilionoideae.

Keywords

Arachis hypogaea groundnut legume pistil pollen-pistil interaction stigma style 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feder N and O’Brien T P 1968 Plant microtechnique: some principles and new methods;Am. J. Bot. 55 123–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ghosh S and Shivanna K R 1982 Anatomical and cytochemical studies on the stigma and style in some legumes;Bot. Gaz. 143 311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hawkins G F and Evans A M 1973 Elucidating the behaviour of pollen tubes in intra- and inter-specific pollinations inPhaseolus vulgaris L. andP. coccineus Lam;Euphytica 22 378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heslop-Harrison J and Heslop-Harrison Y 1982 Pollen-stigma interaction in the Leguminosae: The organization of the stigma inTrifolium pratense L;Ann. Bot. 51 571–583Google Scholar
  5. Heslop-Harrison J and Heslop-Harrison Y 1984 Stigma organization and control of fertilization inPhaseolus; inProceedings Eucarpia Meeting on Phaseolus Bean Breeding (ed.) Reimann-Philipp pp 88–96Google Scholar
  6. Heslop-Harrison J, Knox R B and Heslop-Harrison Y 1974 Pollenwall proteins: exine held fractions associated with the incompatibility response in Cruciferae;Theor. Appl. Genet. 44 133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heslop-Harrison Y 1977 The pollen-stigma interaction: Pollen tube penetration inCrocus;Ann. Bot. 41 913–922Google Scholar
  8. Heslop-Harrison Y and Heslop-Harrison J 1982 Pollen stigma interaction in the Leguminosae: the secretory system of the style inTrifolium pratense L.;Ann. Bot. 50 635–645Google Scholar
  9. Heslop-Harrison Y and Shivanna K R 1977 The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma;Ann. Bot. 41 1233–1258Google Scholar
  10. Jensen W A 1962Botanical Histochemistry (London: W H Freeman and Co)Google Scholar
  11. Lord E M and Heslop-Harrison Y 1984 Pollen-stigma interaction in the Leguminosae: Stigma organization and breeding system inVicia faba L.;Ann. Bot. 54 827–836Google Scholar
  12. Lord E M and Webster B D 1979 The stigmatic exudate ofPhaseolus vulgaris L.;Bot. Gaz. 140 266–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mattsson O, Knox R B, Heslop-Harrison J and Heslop-Harrison Y 1974 Protein pellicle of stigmatic papillae as a probable recognition site in incompatibility reactions;Nature (London) 247 298–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McGuckin W F and McKenzie B F 1958 An improved periodic acid Fuchsin sulfite staining method for evaluation of glycoproteins;Clin. Chem. 4 476–483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Malti and Shivanna K R 1983 Pollen-pistil interaction in chickpea;Int. Chickpea Newslett. No. 9 10–11Google Scholar
  16. Malti and Shivanna K R 1984 Structure and cytochemistry of the pistil ofCrotalaria retusa L.;Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. B50 92–102Google Scholar
  17. Sastri D C 1984 Incompatibility in angiosperms: Significance in crop improvement;Adv. Appl. Biol. 10 71–111Google Scholar
  18. Sastri D C and Moss J P 1982 Effect of growth regulators on incompatible crosses in the genusArachis L.;J. Exp. Bot. 33 1293–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scandalios J G 1969 Genetic control of multiple molecular forms of enzymes in plants: a review;Biochem. Genet. 3 37–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shivanna K R 1979 Recognition and rejection phenomena during pollen-pistil interaction;Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Plant Sci.) 88 115–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shivanna K R 1982 Pollen-pistil interaction and control of fertilization; inExperimental Embryology of Vascular Plants (ed) B M Johri (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp 131–174Google Scholar
  22. Shivanna K R and Johri B M 1985The Angiosperm Pollen: Structure and Function (New Delhi: Wiley Eastern)Google Scholar
  23. Weber K and Osborn M 1975 Proteins and sodium dodecyl sulfate: molecular weight determination on polyacrylamide gels and related procedures; inThe Proteins (eds) H Neurath and R L Hill (New York: Academic Press)1 179–223Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • K Venkata Lakshmi
    • 1
  • K R Shivanna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations