Proceedings: Plant Sciences

, Volume 95, Issue 4, pp 237–245 | Cite as

Interactions between the root exudates of pearl millet andAzospirillum brasilense

  • B Venkateswarlu
  • A V Rao


Root exudates of different pearl millet varieties showed quantitative differences in organic carbon, reducing sugars, total and amino nitrogen. The growth and nitrogenase activity ofAzospirillum were stimulated by the addition of root exudates in the culture medium. Root exudates were also found to support the growth ofAzospirillum in the rhizosphere. Inoculation withAzospirillum significantly enhanced the root exudation in axenically grown pearl millet plants accompanied by an increase in the permeability of roots. N2-ase activity of the inoculated plants differed among the varieties and was related to the amount of organic carbon released in the exudates. Addition of extraneous carbon source significantly increased the nitrogenase activity of the roots as the carbon compounds provided by the root exudates appear to be inadequate for the optimum expression of nitrogenase activity. The implications of these results in the pearl millet-Azospirillum association were discussed.


Pearl millet root exudates Azospirillum inoculation nitrogenase activity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barber D A and Martin J K 1976 The release of organic substances by cereal roots into the soil;New Phytol. 76 69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barea J N, Bonis A F and Olivares J 1983 Interactions betweenAzospirillum and VA-mycorrhiza and their effects on growth and nutrition of maize and rye grass;Soil Biol. Biochem. 15 705–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck S M and Gilmour C M 1983 Role of wheat root exudates in associative nitrogen fixation;Soil Biol. Biochem. 15 33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boddey R M and Dobereiner J 1982 Association ofAzospirillum and other diazotrophs with tropical gramineae.Transactions; 12th Int. Cong. Soil Sci., New Delhi pp 28–47Google Scholar
  5. Dobereiner J and Day J M 1975 Associative symbiosis in tropical grasses; characterization of microorganisms and nitrogen fixing sites; inProceedings of 1st International Symp. on N 2-fixation (eds) W E Newton and C J Nyman (Washington State Univ. Press) pp 518–538Google Scholar
  6. Garcia M U, Hubbell D H and Gaskins M H 1978 Process of infection of Panicum maximum bySpirillum lipoferum;Ecol. Bull. (Stockholm) 26 373–379Google Scholar
  7. Hess D and Kiefer S 1981 Induction of bacterial nitrogenase activity in-vitro associations: A comparison of the inducing capabilities ofTriticum aestivum andSorghum nigricans;Z. Pflanzenphysiol-Bd. 101S 15–24Google Scholar
  8. Hussain S S and McKeen W E 1963 Interactions between straw-berry roots andRhizoctonia fragariae;Phytopathology 52 541–545Google Scholar
  9. Jackson M L 1958Soil chemical Analysis; Printice Hall of India Private Limited, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  10. Kapulnik Y, Kigel J, Okon Y, Nur I and Henis Y 1981 Effect ofAzospirillum inoculation on some growth parameters and N-content of wheat, sorghum andpanicum;Plant Soil 61 65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee K J and Gaskins M H 1982 Increased root exudation of14C-compounds by sorghum seedlings inoculated with nitrogen fixing bacteria;Plant Soil 69 391–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lethbridge C and Davidson M S 1983 Root associated nitrogen fixing bacteria and their role in the nitrogen nutrition of wheat estimated by15N-isotope dilution;Soil Biol. Biochem. 15 365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin W, Okon Y and Hardy R W F 1983 Enhanced mineral uptake byZea mays andSorghum bicolor roots inoculated withAzospirillum brasilense;Appl Environ. Microbiol. 45 1775–1779PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin P and Glatzle A 1982 Mutual influence ofAzospirillum spp. and grass seedlings;Experientia Suppl. 42 108–210Google Scholar
  15. Moore S and Stein W H 1948 A modified ninhydrin reagent for the photometric determination of amino acids and related compounds;J. Biol. Chem. 186 367–369Google Scholar
  16. Nelson N 1944 A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for determination of glucose;J. Bio. Chem. 153 375–380Google Scholar
  17. Pohlman A A and McColl J G 1982 Nitrogen fixation in the rhizosphere and rhizoplane of barley;Plant Soil 69 341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rai P V and Strobel G A 1966 Chemotaxis of Zoospores ofApanomyces Cochlioides to sugar beet seedlings;Phytopathology 56 1365–1369Google Scholar
  19. Rovira A D 1965 Plant root exudates in relation to the rhizosphere microflora; inEcology of soil borne plant pathogens (eds) K F Baker and W C Snyder (London: John Murray) pp 170–186Google Scholar
  20. Subba Rao N S 1980 Crop response to microbial inoculation; inRecent Advances in Biological Nitrogen Fixation (ed.) N S Subba Rao (London: Arnold) pp 406–420Google Scholar
  21. Tien J M, Gaskins M H and Hubbell D H 1979 Plant growth substances produced byAzospirillum brasilense and their effect on growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.);Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37 1016–1024PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Venkateswarlu B and Rao A V 1983 Response of pearl millet to inoculation with different strains ofAzospirillum brasilense;Plant Soil 74 379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vlassak K and Reynders L 1978 Factors affecting biological dinitrogen fixation by associative symbiosis in temperature regions;Proc. Int. Symp. Use of Isotopes and Radiation in Research on Soil-Plant Relationships (IAEA Colombo) pp 137–147Google Scholar
  24. Von Bulow J F W and Dobereiner J 1975 Potential for nitrogen fixation in maize genotypes in Brazil;Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 72 2389–2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1952

Authors and Affiliations

  • B Venkateswarlu
    • 1
  • A V Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Soil-Water-Plant RelationshipCentral Arid Zone Research InstituteJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations