Proceedings: Plant Sciences

, Volume 91, Issue 5, pp 371–378 | Cite as

Effect of water stress and sucrose on opening and longevity of flowers in gladiolus

  • I V Ramanuja Rao
  • H Y Mohan Ram


The percentage of buds opening and flower longevity as affected by the availability of water and sucrose to out spikes of gladiolus were studied. Uptake of sucrose solution and fresh weight changes in spikes were dependent on sucrose concentration. Marked reduction in uptake and fresh weight occurred when polyethylene glycol (peg) was used as the stressing agent. In comparison.peg failed to induce any significant change in the percentage of flower buds opening. Sucrose was essential for opening since the buds that failed to open in the control were caused to open in sucrose. Induced water stress did not curtail flower longevity at any given concentration of sucrose. Thus flower opening and longevity in gladiolus appear to be limited more by the availability of sucrose than water.


Flower longevity flower opening gladiolus polyethylene glycol sucrose water stress 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borochov A, Mayak S and Halevy A H 1967a Combined effects of abscisic acid and sucrose on growth and senescence of rose flowers;Physiologia Plant. 36. 221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borochov A, Mayak S and Halevy A H 1976b Abscisic acid content of senescing petals on cut rose flowers as affected by suerose and water stress;Pl. Physiol. 58 175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bravdo B, Mayak S and Gravrieli Y 1974 Sucrose and water uptake from concentrated sucrose solutions by gladiolus shoots and the effect of these treatments on floret life;Can. J. Bot. 52 1271–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coorts G D 1973 Internal metabolic changes in cut flower;Hort. Sci. 8 195–198Google Scholar
  5. Durkin D and Kuc R 1966 Vascular blockage and senescence of the cut rose flower;Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 89 683–689Google Scholar
  6. Gilman K F and Steponkus P L 1972 Vascular blockage in cut loses;J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 97 662–667Google Scholar
  7. Goldschmidt E E and Huberman M 1974 The co-ordination of organ growth in developing citrus flowers: a possibility for sink type regulation;J. Exp. Bot. 25 534–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Halevy A H and Mayak S 1974 Improvement of cut flower quality, opening and longevity by pre-shipment treatments;Acta Hortic. 43 335–347Google Scholar
  9. Kofranek A M, Halevy A H and Kubota J 1975 Bud opening of chrysanthemums after long term storage;Hort. Sci. 10 378–380Google Scholar
  10. Kofranek A M and Halevy A H 1976 Sucrose pulsing of gladiolus stems before storage to increase spike quality;Hort. Sci. 11 572–573Google Scholar
  11. Marousky F J 1969 Vascular blockage, water absorption, stomatal opening and respiration of cut “Better Times” roses treated with 8-hydroxyquinoline citrate and sucrose;J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 94 223–226Google Scholar
  12. Mayak S and Halevy A H 1971 Water stress as the cause for failure of flower bud opening, in iris;J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 96 482–483Google Scholar
  13. Mayak S, Bravdo B, Guilli A and Halevy A H 1973 Improvement of opening of cut gladioli flowers by pretreatment with high sugar concentrations;Scientia Hortic. Amsterdam1, 357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayak S, Halevy A H, Sagie S, Bar-Yoseph A and Bravdo B 1974 The water balance of cut rose flowers;Physiologia Plant. 31 15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mayak S and Dilley D R 1976 Effect of sucrose on responses of cut carnations to kinet in ethylene and abscisic acid;J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 101 583–585Google Scholar
  16. van Meeteren U 1978 Water relations and keeping-quality of cutGerbera flowers. I. The cause of stem break;Scientia Hortic. Amsterdam8 65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paulin A 1972 Influence d’un deficit temperaire en eau sur le metabolisme azote des fléurs coupées d’Iris germanica;C. r. Hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris275 209–212Google Scholar
  18. Rao I V Ramanuja and Mohan Ram H Y 1979 Interaction of gibberellin and sucrose in flower bud opening in gladiolus;Indian J. Exp. Biol. 17 447–448Google Scholar
  19. Rao I V Ramanuja and Mohan Ram H Y 1981 Nature of differences between green-bud and tight-bud spikes of gladiolus: basis for a postharvest bud-opening treatment;Indian J. Exp. Biol. 19 1116–1120Google Scholar
  20. Rao I V Ramanuja and Mohan Ram H Y 1982a Prevention of compensatory withering and stem-break in cut spikes of gladiolus by overcoming vascular blockage;Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. Part B (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Rao I V Ramanuja and Mohan Ram H Y 1982b Specificity of gibberellin and sucrose promoted flower bud growth in gladiolus;Ann. Bot. 50 473–479Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • I V Ramanuja Rao
    • 1
  • H Y Mohan Ram
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations