Journal of Genetics

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 157–172 | Cite as

The sex ratio inAsparagus officinalis L. and its artificial modification

  • R. C. Malhotra


  1. 1.

    The data show that a lower percentage of staminate plants is due to the lack of a proper amount of volatile oils left in the pollen before pollination.

  2. 2.

    By the use of pollen sprayed with volatile oil the percentage of staminate plants was increased by about 26·1±1.

  3. 3.

    The data show that it is the presence or absence or abundance of volatile oil in the pollen which modifies the normal ratio of staminate and pistillate plants, and not the increase or decrease of water content. If water has any significance in the ratio, it is very small (±4 per cent.).

  4. 4.

    It is possible by this method to increase the percentage of staminate plants over that of pistillate ones, at least in the Mary Washington strain of asparagus.



Female Plant Staminate Flower Pistillate Flower Male Plant Late Bloom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anonymous (1924). “Improving Delta asparagus.”Pacific Rural Press,CVII, 302 March 1st.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1925). “Asparagus rust threatens.”Ibid. Pacific Rural Press CX, 10, July 4th.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. S. (1928). “The effect of apple blossom removal on flower bud formation.”Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. XXV, 198–201.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, C. J. (1927). “The influence of pollen maturity and restricted pollination on the simple Mendelian ratio in the pea.”Journ. Gen. XVII, 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borthwick, H. A. (1924). “Factors influencing the rate of germination of the seeds ofAsparague officinalis.” University of California Publications, Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Paper,XVIII.Google Scholar
  6. Böttner, J. (1921).Praktischer Lehrbuch des Spargelbaus, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  7. De Fabery, S. L. (1916). “Control of asparagus rust.”Country Gentleman,LXXXI, 165, September 9th.Google Scholar
  8. Fisher, R. A. (1925).Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, London.Google Scholar
  9. Green, W. J. (1890). “Asparagus.”Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. IX, 2nd series, 3, 241–4.Google Scholar
  10. Hooker, H. D. (1925). “Investigations by American Horticulturalists on carbohydrate nitrogen relations.”Journ. Pom. and Hort. Sci. V, 34–42.Google Scholar
  11. Houben, J. (1921).Die Methoden der organischen Chemie, 2nd ed., p. 582. George Thieme Co., Leipzig.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, H. A. andRobbins, W. W. (1924). “Growing and handling of asparagus crowns.”Calif. Exp. Sta. Bull. CCCLXXXI.Google Scholar
  13. Kraus, E. J. andKraybill, H. R. (1918). “Vegetation and reproduction with special reference to tomato.”Oregon Exp. Sta. Bull. CXLIX.Google Scholar
  14. Kraybill, H. R. (1923). “Effect of shading and ringing upon the chemical composition of apple and peach trees.”Neu Hamp. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. XXIII, 3–27.Google Scholar
  15. Murneek, A. E. (1927). “Fruit thinning in Missouri.”Mo. Exp. Sta. Bull. CCLII, 1–315.Google Scholar
  16. Norton, J. B. (1924). “The story of Mary Washington.”Market Grower's Journ. XXXIV, 229–30, March 15th.Google Scholar
  17. Paddock, W. andCharles, F. G. (1928). “The effect of apple blossom removal upon bud formation and differentiation.”Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. XXV, 195–7.Google Scholar
  18. Perry, E. J. (1911). “Volatile or essential oils.” InAllen's Commercial Organic Analysis, 4th ed.,IV, 217–24. P. Blakiston's Son and Co.Google Scholar
  19. Robbins, W. W. andJones, H. A. (1925). “Secondary sex characters inAsparagus officinalis L..”Hilgardia,I, 183–202.Google Scholar
  20. — (1926). “Sex as a factor in growing asparagus.”Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. XXIII, 19–23.Google Scholar
  21. — (1928). “Further studies on sex in asparagus.”Ibid. XXV, 13–16.Google Scholar
  22. Robbins, W. W. (1926). “Varieties of asparagus.”California Countryman,XII, 7, January.Google Scholar
  23. Roberts, R. H. (1920). “Off year apple bearing and apple spur growth.”Wisc. Exp. Sta. Bull. CCCXVII, 1–35.Google Scholar
  24. Sears, P. B. andMetcalf, E. (1926–7). “The behaviour of pollen starch in a Geranium and its bud sport.”Journ. Gen. XVII 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson, H. F. (1923). “Asparagus notes.”Market Grower's Journ. XXXII, 92.Google Scholar
  26. Tiedjens, V. A. (1924). “Some physiological aspects ofAsparagus officinalis.”Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. XXI, 129–40.Google Scholar
  27. Walker, J. (1913).Introduction to Practical Chemistry, 7th ed., pp. 84–7. Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  28. Wheeler, W. (1922). “Washington asparagus strains.”Market Grower's Journ. XXX, 140, March 1st.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1930

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. C. Malhotra
    • 1
  1. 1.Hull Botanical LaboratoryUniv. of ChicagoChicagoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations