Advertisement

Physiology of the spike disease of sandal

  • B. N. Sastri
Article

Conclusion

The study of physiological characteristics of virus diseases will be found useful in (1) diagnosing the disease at an early stage and (2) in discovering resistant strains. Such studies have hardly been begun with sandal. Holmes (1932) has recently developed a technique of iodine staining which renders local lesions, due to virus, conspicuous and reveals the points of infection. Such studies may be profitably extended to sandal spike. Resistant varieties are generally characterised by low acidity and poor oxidase activities. Other factors of disease resistance, such, for instance as, phenols, glocosides, alkaloids, etc., have to be investigated. The study of active groups in tissue fluids for which a scheme was recently outlined (Sastri and Sreenivasaya, 1934) may usefully be undertaken in this connection. The possibility of nurturing sandal through appropriate hosts to impart resistance to disease has been amply demonstrated by the work of Sreenivasaya and the study of physiological characters of such plants would give results of great significance.

Keywords

Oxalic Acid Succinic Acid Malic Acid Methyl Glyoxal Gluconic Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennet-ClarkThe New Phytologist, 1933,32, 39.Google Scholar
  2. ColemanSpike-disease of Sandal, Bull. No. 3, Entomological Series, Dept. of Agric., Mysore, 1917.Google Scholar
  3. HolmesContrib. Boyce Thomp. Institute, 1932,4, 297.Google Scholar
  4. Holmes and PirieBrit. J. Expt. Path., 1932,13, 364.Google Scholar
  5. IyengarJ. Ind. Inst. Sci., 1933,16A, 139.Google Scholar
  6. Ibid.,, 1928,11A, 103.Google Scholar
  7. Ibid.,, 1933,16A, 139.Google Scholar
  8. Nature, 1935,135, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jodidi, Moulton and MarkleyJ. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1920,42, 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keshava IyengarThesis for the Degree of Master of Science, Bombay Univ., 1932.Google Scholar
  11. KayBiochem. J., 1926,20, 321.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. LoewU.S. Dept. Agric. Bureau of Plant Industry, 1903, Bull. No. 45.Google Scholar
  13. Narasimhamurthy and SreenivasayaJ. Ind. Inst. Sci., 1929,12A, 153.Google Scholar
  14. PurrBiochem. J., 1934,28, 1907.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. QuanjerMeded Landbwhoogesch., Wageningen, 1913,6, 41.Google Scholar
  16. RaistrickPhil. Trans.,B220, 153.Google Scholar
  17. Raistrick,et al. Phil. Trans., 1931,B220, 9.Google Scholar
  18. SastriProc. Ind. Sci. Cong., 1929, p. 242.Google Scholar
  19. J. Ind. Inst. Sci., 1929,12A, 25.Google Scholar
  20. Sastri and NarayanaJ. Ind. Inst. Sci., 1930,13A, 147.Google Scholar
  21. Sastri and SreenivasayaJ. Ind. Inst. Sci., 1929,12A, 233.Google Scholar
  22. Sreenivasa RauJ. Ind. Inst. Sci., 1933,16A 91.Google Scholar
  23. SreenivasayaNature, 1930,126, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sreenivasaya and SastriJ. Ind. Inst. Sci., 1928,11A, 23.Google Scholar
  25. J. Ind. Inst. Sci., 1929,12A, 239.Google Scholar
  26. Stiles, Peterson and Fred.J. Biol. Chem., 1925,64, 643.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1936

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. N. Sastri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryIndian Institute of ScienceBangalore

Personalised recommendations