Effectiveness and efficiency of single and combined treatments of radiations and ethyl methane sulphonate inSorghum

  • K. Sreeramulu


The effect of single treatments with X- and gamma rays and EMS and combination treatments of gamma rays sand EMS on survival, seedling growth and seed fertility in M1 and chlorophyll mutation frequency in M2 was studied in the variety Co. 18 ofS. subglabrascens. There was an increase in the reduction of survival and seedling height and seed fertility with an increase in the dose of mutagens. Combined treatments were found to be more effective in reducing the survival and height of seedlings than single treatments, while EMS caused more drastic effect on seed fertility than rest of the mutagens. The frequency of chlorophyll mutations in the M2 increased with dose upto a certain dose level and then levelled off at high doses. EMS induced higher frequency of chlorophyll mutations than treatments with radiations. Combination treatments were found to be the most efficient in inducing the chlorophyll mutations as compared to single treatments. Mutagenic effectiveness was found to be the maximum at high doses of gamma rays and EMS, whereas higher efficiency values were observed at lower concentrations of EMS and middle doses of radiations. EMS was found to be the most effective and efficient mutagen than rest of the mutagens.


Combine Treatment Single Treatment Drastic Effect Seedling Height Chemical Mutagen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aastveit, K... “Effects of combinations of mutagens on mutation frequency in barley,”Proc. on the Use of Induced Mutations in Plant Breeding II (IAEA, Vienna), 1968, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  2. Arnason, T. J., Mohammed, L. and Renneberg, F. M. “Mutation frequency in barley after treatment with gamma radiation, ethylene imine, ethyl methane sulphenate and maleic hydrazide,”Canadian J. Genet. Cytol., 1962,41, 172–78.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, W. T. and Hsieh, S. C. “Mutations in rice induced by X-rays (a preliminary report),”J. Agric., 1957,7, 7–14.Google Scholar
  4. Favret, E. A. .. “Genetic effects of single and combined treatment of ionizing radiations and ethyl methane sulphonate on barley seeds,”Proceedings of the First in Tern. Barley Genet., 1963, pp. 68–81.Google Scholar
  5. Froese-Gertzen, E. E., Konzak, C. F., Nilan R. A., and Heiner, R. E. “The effects of ethyl met hane sulphonate on the growth response, chromosome structure and mutation rate in barley,”Rad. Bot., 1964,4, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaul, H... “Mutations in plant breeding” Ibid., 1964,4, 155–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Konzak, C. F. Nilan, R. A. Wagner, J. and Foster, R. J. “Efficient chemical mutagenesis,”Symp. Use of Induced Mutations in Plant Breeding (FAO/IAEA), 1965, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
  8. Sato, M. and Gaul, H... “Effects of ethyl methane sulphonate on the fertility of barley,”Rad. Bot., 1967,7, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sreeramulu, K. .. “Studies on induced mutations in the genusSorghum (Moench),”Thesis submitted for Ph.D. degree of Univ. of Madras, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. Swaminathan, M. S... “Effects of diplontic selection on the frequency and spectrum of mutations induced in polyploids following seed irradiations,”Sym. Effects of Ionizing Radiation on Seeds and Significance for Crop Improvement (IAEA), Vienna, 1961, pp. 279–88.Google Scholar
  11. —————.. “A comparison of mutation induction in diploids and polyploids,”Symp. on the Use of Induced Mutations in Plant Breeding (FAO/IAEA), Rome, 1965, pp. 619–649.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sreeramulu
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Cytogenetics and Plant Breeding, Agricultural College and Research InstituteTamilnadu Agricultural UniversityCoimbatore-3

Personalised recommendations