Breeding for disease resistance in plants
- 43 Downloads
In breeding for resistance, specific resistance is not the ideal to aim at. Generalized resistance to biotypes of the pathogen is the ultimate goal but difficult to attain. The concept of evolving multiline hybrids to combat the ever increasing threat from bioraces, especially in the cereal rusts, now engages the attention of plant breeders. Locating gene centers as the repositories of greatest wealth of hereditary variants, displaying naturally inbred characteristics, are indispensible as gene pool for ongoing breeding programmes and development of “Population resistance” or “Synthetic horizontal resistance”.
Two concepts of breeding for Vertical Resistance (VR) or for Horizontal Resistance (HR), the former conditioned by oligogenes and the latter by polygenes, are invaluable in evolving resistant varieties that can slow down epidemics and offer protection. VR confers complete but impermanent protection, whereas HR confers incomplete but permanent protection.
A point of interest is that differentially, pathogen races, differ in virulence and other races differ in aggressiveness. A race with unnecessary virulence is less fit to survive on a strong resistance gene host than a weakly virulent one. With the discovery of ‘Phytoalexins’ producedin vivo in host under pathogenesis, which are essentially phenolics, with a possible rôle in initiating defence mechanism in plants, the search is on for similar substances in resistant cultivars. Enhanced synthesis of lignins are also considered as a means of building up resistance in plants to pathogens.
Plant pathologists have been looking for genetic markers in the many end-products of biosynthesis that could resist pathogenic invasion of tissues. Alterations in respiratory rates and oxidase activity, in general under pathogenesis, have received much attention. More recently, germination of a fungus spore has been shown to be accompanied by mRNA synthesis with subsequent changes in ribosomal activity. It has been suggested that host-parasite interaction could be between host genes and infective RNA. One of the major roles of activated oxidative processes could be that of detoxificationin vivo of the pathogen’s toxin, a characteristic of resistant cultivars so far examined. The present trend may lead on to a better understanding of the much debated question as to whether natural immunity exists in plants against specific pathogens.
KeywordsLate Blight Rust Resistance Tobacco Mosaic Virus Resistant Cultivar Specific Resistance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allen, P. J., Toxins and tissue respiration.Phytopathology 43 221–229 (1953).Google Scholar
- Anon., Disease resistance Panel call for genetic conservation. FAO/IAEA/UNPlant Genetic Resources News letter, Pl. Prod. & Protec. Div. (1971).Google Scholar
- Beckman, C. H., Cell irritability and localization of vascular infections in plants.Phytopathology 56 821–824 (1966).Google Scholar
- Borlaug, N. E., Wheat, rust and people.Phytopathology 55 1088–1098 (1965).Google Scholar
- Caldwell, R. M., Advances and challenges in the control of plant diseases through breeding, inPest Control by Chemical, Biological and Physical means. AAAs Symp. (Sect 0 on Agric.), Dec. 1964. Knipling, E. F., Chairman, ARS, Montreal, Canada, U.S. Dept. Agr. ARS 33–110; 117–126 (1966).Google Scholar
- Fischer, E. and Gäumann, E.,Biologie der Pflanzen-bewohnenden Parasitischen Pilze. Jena: Fischer, 428 pp. (1929).Google Scholar
- Frey, K. J. and Browning, J. A.,Breeding Crop Plants for Disease Resistance, pp. 45–54. (Int. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna), Proc. of a Panel, Vienna, IAEA/FAO, Oct. 1970 (1971).Google Scholar
- Gäumann, E.,Pflanzlische Infectionslehre. Lehrbuch der Allgemeinen Pflanzenpathologie für Biologen, Landwirte, Forster und Pflanzenzüchter, Basel, Birkhauser 611 pp. 1946. Trans. W. B. Brierley:Principles of Plant Infection, Lond.. Crosby & Lockwood.Google Scholar
- Harlan, J. R., Geographic origin of plants useful to agriculture, inGerm Plasm Resources, ed. R. E. Hodgson, 3–19, AAAS Publ., 66 (1961).Google Scholar
- Hooker, A. L., Crop vulnerability and breeding for resistance.FAO Plant Protection Bull. 20 18–20 (1972).Google Scholar
- Leppik, E. E., Gene centers of plants as sources of disease resistance.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 323–344 (1970).Google Scholar
- Ozeretskovskaya, O., Vasyukova, N. and Metlinskii, L., Study of phytoalexins.Dokl. Bot. Sci. 109 158–160 (1969).Google Scholar
- Robinson, R. A., The value of vertical resistance in agriculture, inMutation Breeding for Disease Resistance, pp. 39–44. (Int. Atomic Energy, Vienna). Proc. of a Panel, Vienna, IAEA/FAO, Oct. 1970 (1971).Google Scholar
- Robinson, R. A., Vertical Resistance.Rev. Pl. Pathol. 50 233–239 (1971a).Google Scholar
- Robinson, R. A., Horizontal Resistance.Rev. Pl. Pathol. 52 483–501 (1973).Google Scholar
- Rubin, B. A. and Artsikhovskaya, Ye. V.,Biochemistry and Physiology of Plant Immunity. Pergamon Press, London, 1963, 358 pp.Google Scholar
- Rubin, B. A. and Ivanova, T. M., The rôle of oxidase of aminoacids in cabbage immunity toBotrytis cinera. Plodovi Ovoshchei 5 113–132 (1959).Google Scholar
- Stall, R. E., Hortenstine, C. C. and Iley, J. R., Incidence ofBotrytis gray mold in relation to a calcium-phosphorus balance.Phytopathology 55 447–449 (1965).Google Scholar
- van der Plank, J. E.,Disease Resistance in Plants. Academic Press, New York, pp. 206 (1968).Google Scholar
- Vavilov, N. I.,The Origin, Variation, Immunity and Breeding of Cultivated Plants. Trans. from Russian by K. S. Chester,Chronica Botanica, Vol. 13, 364 pp. (1949–50).Google Scholar
- Wolfe, M. S., The genetics of barley mildew.Rev. Pl. Pathol. 51 507–522 (1972).Google Scholar
- Wood, R. K. S.et al., Altering the Resistance of Plants to Pests and Diseases, (Multi-author Symp.).Pans 17 240–257 (1971).Google Scholar
- Zhukovsky, P. M. and Migushova, E. F., Most resistant endemic genofund for breeding of resistant cultivars of wheat by hybridization.Vestn. Sel’skokloz. Nauki, Moscow 2 1–20 (1969).Google Scholar