Role of actomyosin in contraction of unstriated muscle

  • Inderjit Singh
  • Sunita Inderjit Singh

Summary and Conclusions

  1. 1.

    Experiments have been performed on dying muscles. In such muscles, the excitatory system is destroyed and the substances act directly upon the contractile mechanism. The excitatory system was also rendered inoperative by chloroform.

  2. 2.

    In such muscles 0·1–0·3M KC1 produces contraction, and higher concentrations (0·4 to2 M) produce passive relaxation. This suggests that contraction is due to association and relaxation to dissociation of actomyosin.

  3. 3.

    Urea and thiourea produce active relaxation. As urea is also known to produce dissociation of actomyosin, these experiments suggest that the dissociation of actomyosin is of two kinds, one producing active and the other passive relaxation.

  4. 4.

    Many salts which produce dissociation of actomyosin produce relaxation.

  5. 5.

    Distilled water causes active relaxation.

  6. 6.

    The effect of potassium chloride has been tested on livingMytilus muscle in normal physiological condition. These experiments also suggest that contraction is due to association and relaxation to dissociation of actomyosin.



Potassium Chloride Sodium Pyrophosphate Active Relaxation Excitatory System Maximal Relaxation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Csapo A.Nature, 1948,162, 218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amer. J. Physiol., 1950,160, 46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Csapo, A. and Gergely, J.Nature, 1950,161, 1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erdos, T.Stud. Szeged, 1943,3, 51. Quoted from Szent Gyorgyi.Google Scholar
  5. Lajtha, A.Pub. Staz. Zool. Napoli, 1947,21, 226, Quoted from Szen, Gyorgyi.Google Scholar
  6. Mommaerts, W. F. H. M.Muscular Contraction, 1950. Interscience Publishers, New York, London.Google Scholar
  7. Rosza, G.Hung. Acta. Physiol., 1946,1, 16. Quoted from Szent Gyorgyi.Google Scholar
  8. Singh, I.J. Physiol., 1938a,91, 398;Ibid., 1938b,92, 232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1943a,18, 53.Google Scholar
  10. —, 1943b,17, 13.Google Scholar
  11. Curr. Sci., 1944a,13, 311.Google Scholar
  12. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1944b,20, 209.Google Scholar
  13. Curr. Sci., 1952,21, 77.Google Scholar
  14. -Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 1953, 37.Google Scholar
  15. Singh, S. I. and Singh, I. —, 1949,30, 270.Google Scholar
  16. —, 1950a,31, 351.Google Scholar
  17. —, 1950b,32, 12.Google Scholar
  18. —, 1951,33, 165.Google Scholar
  19. Agra University Journal of Research, 1952,1, 185.Google Scholar
  20. Szent Gyorgyi, A.Chemistry of Muscular Contraction, 1951, Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1953

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inderjit Singh
    • 1
  • Sunita Inderjit Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyMedical CollegeAgra

Personalised recommendations