Advertisement

On the eyes of polychaetes

  • P. R. Sadasivan Tampi
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Summary

  1. 1.

    A detailed study of the eyes of a few common polychætes of Madras with different habits has been carried out giving a brief comparison of their structure with that of allied forms from European waters.

     
  2. 2.

    The eye in Eunicidæ is usually composed of a retinal cup and a central refractive body which consists of a localised thickening of the cuticle; the connection between the cuticle and the refractive body being retained in the adult worms.

     
  3. 3.

    In Nereidæ which includes mostly free living errant forms, the refractive part of the eye consists of a more or less semi-solid glassy body which does not show any connection with the cuticle.

     
  4. 4.

    In the Tomopteridæ which are pelagic the retina is a simple pigment cup without differentiation into retinal cells or rods. The nature of the refractive body is also very simple.

     
  5. 5.

    In Sabellids which are tubicolous the visual organs are of the nature of compound eyes occurring on the main stem of the branchiæ. Each of these is composed of a number of individual units with a separate refractive body.

     
  6. 6.

    Although polychætes of the same family have almost the same ground plan in the construction of their eyes, differences in the degree of development of the eyes have been observed within the same family. The causes of these differences in the visual organs have been attributed to the differences in the mode of life of the animals and it has been found that the free living or errant forms have much better developed eyes compared with the burrowing ones where the eyes are usually absent. In all of them the early free swimming larvæ possess eyes but in the case of burrowing forms the eyes disappear as they grow, often leaving no trace of their existence in the adult condition.

     

Keywords

Retina Sensitive Cell Retinal Cell Retinal Layer Vitreous Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Aiyar, R. G. “Development and breeding habits of Marphysa,”Journ. Linn, Soc., 1931,37.Google Scholar
  2. - “On the Anatomy ofMarphysa gravelyi Southern,”Rec. Ind. Mus., 1933,35 (3).Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, E. A. “On the Eyes of Polychæta (A Preliminary Communication),”Zool. Anz., 1891,Bd. 14, No. 371.Google Scholar
  4. - “Compound eyes of Annelids,”Journ. Morph., 1891,5.Google Scholar
  5. - “Eyes of Polychætous Annelids,”Ibid., 1892,7.Google Scholar
  6. Beddard, F. E. “Reports on Annelids from the Mergui Archipelago,”Journ. Linn. Soc., 1888,21.Google Scholar
  7. Béraneck, Ed. “Embryogénie et Histologie de 1’Oeil des Alciopides,”Revue Suisse de Zoologique, 1893, T. 1.Google Scholar
  8. Brunotte, C. “Recherches sur la structure de ’oeil chez unBranchiomma,”Comptes Rendus, 1888,1, 106.Google Scholar
  9. Carriere, J. “Die Sehorgane der Thiere,”Munchem u. Leipzig, 1885.Google Scholar
  10. Chatin, J. “Recherches pour servirá l’histoire du batonet optique,”Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool., 1878, Ser.6, T. 7.Google Scholar
  11. Demoll, R. “Die Augen vonAlciopa cantrainii,”Zool. Jahrb. Anat., 1909,Bd. 27.Google Scholar
  12. Ehlers, E. “Reports on Annelids,”Mem. Mus. Zool. Harv., 1887,25.Google Scholar
  13. Fauvel, P. “Polychetes Errantes,”Fauna de France, Paris, 1923.Google Scholar
  14. - “Polychetes Sedentaires,” Ibid., 1927.Google Scholar
  15. - “Annelida Polychaeta of the Indian Museum, Calcutta,”Mem. Ind. Mus., 1932,12 (a).Google Scholar
  16. Graber, V. “Morphologische Untersuchungen uber die Augen der freilebenden marinen Borstenwurmer,”Arch. Mikr. Anat., 1880,Bd., 17.Google Scholar
  17. Greeff, R. “Ober die Augen insbesondere die Retina der Alciopiden,”Sitzgsber. Ges. Beforder. ges. Natw. Marburg., 1875, 3–24.Google Scholar
  18. Grube, E. “Annulata Semperiana,”Mem. Acad. Imper. Sci. St. Petersburg, 1878,7, 25 (a).Google Scholar
  19. Harms, J. W. “Die Realisation von Genen und die consecutive adaptation,”Zeit. f. wiss. Zool., 1929,Bd. 133.Google Scholar
  20. Hesse, R. “Untersuchungen über die Organe der Lichtempfindung bei niederen Tieren, 5, Die Augen der Polychaten Anneliden,” Ibid., 1899,Bd. 65.Google Scholar
  21. - “Untersuchungen über die Organe der Lichtempfindung bei niederen Tieren. Weitere Tatsachen Allgemeines,”Ibid., 1902,Bd. 72.Google Scholar
  22. Jourdan, Et. “E’tudes histologiques sur deux especes du genre Eunice,”Ann. Sci. Nat., 1887, Ser. 7,2 (6).Google Scholar
  23. Kolliker, H. “Über kopfkiemer mit Augen an den Kiemen,”Zeit. f. wiss. Zool., 1858,Bd. 9 (b).Google Scholar
  24. Krohn, A. “Zoologische und anatomische Bemerkungen uber die Alciopiden,”Arch. f. Natg., 1845, 11.Google Scholar
  25. Kükenthal, W., and Krumbach, T.Handbuch der Zoologie, 1934,Bd. 2, Pt. 2.Google Scholar
  26. Müller, J. “Memoire sur la structure des yeux chez les Mollusques, Gastropods et quelques Annelides,”Ann. des. Sere. Nat., 1831,T. 22.Google Scholar
  27. Pflügfelder, O. “Über den feineren Bau der Augen freilebenden Polychaten,”Zeit.f. wiss. Zool, 1932,Bd. 142.Google Scholar
  28. Quatrefages, A. “E’tudes sur les types inferieures de l’embranchement des Anneles—Memoire sur la famille des Polyophthalmiens,”Ann. Sci. Nat., 1850, 3rd Ser. T. 13.Google Scholar
  29. Ranganathan. V. “On an extreme case of adaptation in a PolychaeteLycastis indica Southern etc.” (Unpublished), 1942.Google Scholar
  30. Wagner, R.Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie, 1834,Bd. 1.Google Scholar
  31. Wjlson, D. P. “The larvae of British Sabellarians,”Journ. Mar. Biol. Assn., 1929,16, No. 1.Google Scholar
  32. - “The development ofBranchiomma vesiculosum,”Quart. Journ. Micro. Sci., 1936,78, Pt. 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1949

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. R. Sadasivan Tampi
    • 1
  1. 1.University Zoological Research LaboratoryMadras

Personalised recommendations