Some aspects of the anatomy of Anura (Amphibia)—A review

  • L. S. Ramaswami


Vertebral Column Otic Capsule Cranial Morphology Membrane Bone Palatine Bone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abel, O. “Stammengeschichte und Palaobiologie”, 1929, Fischer & Co., Jena.Google Scholar
  2. Baini PrashadRec. Ind. Mus., 1918,25, Part III, 97.Google Scholar
  3. Beddard, F. E.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1911, p. 393.Google Scholar
  4. de Beer, G. R.,Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 1926,70, 263; “The development of the Vertebrate Skull,” 1937, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Blume, W.Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 1931,65, 665.Ibid., Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 1932,71, 171.Ibid., Gegen. Morph. Jahrb. 1933,72, 103.Google Scholar
  6. Born, G.Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 1876,2.Google Scholar
  7. Boulenger, G. A.Cat. Bat. Sal., 2nd edition, London, 1882.Fauna of Brit. Ind. (Reptiles and Batrachia), 1890. Papers not accessible to the author. “The Tailless Batrachians of Europe”, Ray Society, 1897.Rec. Ind. Mus., 192020, 1.Google Scholar
  8. Brock, G. T.Anat. Anz., 1935,80, Nr. 13/16.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, H. Z.Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 1902,29.Google Scholar
  10. Devanesan, D. W.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1922, 527.Google Scholar
  11. Ecke, H.Z. Morph. Okol. Tiere., 1935,29, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frazier, M.J. Morph. & Phy., 1924,39, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gadow, H.Cam. Nat. Hist., “Reptiles and Amphibia,” Macmillan & Co., London, 1901.Google Scholar
  14. Gaupp, E. Papers not accessible to the author.Morph. Arb., 1893,2.Ibid., Morph. Arb., 1893,3.Google Scholar
  15. Günther, A. Papers not accessible to the author.Cat. Bat. Sal. Brit. Mus., London, 1858.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1858, 339.Google Scholar
  16. Goodrich, E. S. “Structure and Development of Vertebrates,” Macmillan & Co., London, 1930.Google Scholar
  17. Goto, S.Annotationes Zoologicœ Jap., 1906,5, Part V. 267.Google Scholar
  18. Howes, G. B.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1891, 148.Google Scholar
  19. van Kampen, P. N. “The Amphibia of the Indo-Australian Archipelago,” Leiden, 1923.Google Scholar
  20. Kingsbury, B. F., and Reed, H. D.J. Morph., 1909,20, Nr. 4, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lapage, E. O.J. Morph., 1928,46, Nr. 2, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahendra, B. C.Curr. Sci., 1936,4, 744.Ibid., Curr. Sci., 1937,6, 13.Google Scholar
  23. Mivart, St. G.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1869, 280.Google Scholar
  24. Mookerjee, H. K.Curr. Sci., 1932,1, 165.Google Scholar
  25. Müller, F.Gegen. Morph. Jahrb., 1932,70, 131.Google Scholar
  26. Nicholls, G. E.Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond., Session 128, 1915–16, 80.Google Scholar
  27. Noble, G. K.Bul. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1922,46, 1.Amer. Mus. Novit., 1925,165.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1927,30, 31.Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1929,58, 291. “The Biology of Amphibia,” McGraw-Hill & Co., New York, 1931.Google Scholar
  28. Noble, G. K., and Parker, H. W.Amer. Mus. Novit., 1926,232.Google Scholar
  29. Parker, H. W.Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1928, Series 10,2, 473. Papers not accessible to the author.Arch. Zool. Torino., 1931,16, 1239.Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1931b, Series 10,8. “Frogs of the Family Microhylidæ” Brit. Mus. Pub., Lond., 1934.Google Scholar
  30. Parker, W. K.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., 1881,172, Part III, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rao, C. R. NarayanJ. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1920, 119.Ibid., J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 1922, 439.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1925, 587.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., Bangalore, 1937,6 B, 387.Google Scholar
  32. Ramaswami, L. S.Half-Yearly J. Mys. Univ., 1932,6, 45.Ibid., Half-Yearly J. Mys. Univ., 1932a,6, 176.Ibid., Half-Yearly J. Mys. Univ., 1932b,6, 32.Curr. Sci., 1933,1, Nr. 10, 306.Ibid., Half-Yearly, J. Mys. Univ., 1933a,2, Nr. 1, 7.Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., Bangalore, 1934,1, 80.Ibid., Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., Bangalore, 1935,2B, Nr. 1, 1.Anat. Anz., 1935a,81, Nr. 4/6, 65.Curr. Sci., 1935b,3, Nr. 7, 306.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1937, 1137.Google Scholar
  33. Ridewood, W. G.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1897, 577.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, M. A.Bul. Raffles Mus., Singapore, 1930, Nr. 3.Google Scholar
  35. Schoonees, D. A.S. Afr. J. Sci., 1930,27, 456.Google Scholar
  36. du Toit, C. A.S. Afr. J. Sci., 1930,27, 426.Ibid., S. Afr. J. Sci., 1930a,27, 439.Ibid., S. Afr. J. Sci., 1931,28, 408.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1933, 715.Ibid., Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1934, 119. “A revision of the genus Heleophryne”.Ann. Univ. of Stellenbosch. S. Afr., 1934.Google Scholar
  37. du Toit, G. P.S. Afr. J. Sci., 1933,30, 394.Google Scholar
  38. —, and de Villiers, C. G. S.S. Afr. J. Sci., 1932,29, 449.Google Scholar
  39. Trewavas, E.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., 1933,222B, 401.Google Scholar
  40. Versluys, J.Leerboek der vergl. ontleed. verlebrata, 2 deelen. Utrecht., 1924.Google Scholar
  41. de Villiers, C. G. S.S. Afr. J. Sci., 1926,23, 61.Ibid., S. Afr. J. Sci., 1930,27, 481.Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 1930a,73, 667.Ibid., Quart. J. Micr. Sci., 1931,74, 275.S. Afr. J. Sci., 1931a,28, 378.Anat. Anz., 1931b,71, 305.Ibid., Anat. Anz., 1931c,71, 331.Ibid., Anat. Anz., 1931d,72, 164.Ibid., Anat. Anz., 1932,74, 33.Ibid., Anat. Anz., 1932a.75, 257.Bul. Mus. Comp. Zool., Harvard, 1934,67, 3.Anat. Anz., 1934a,78, 295.S. Afr. J. Sci., 1934b,31, 406.Anat. Anz., 1936,81, 225.Google Scholar
  42. de Vos, C. M.Anat. Anz., 1935,80, Nr. 13/16, 241.Google Scholar
  43. Wagner, D. S.Anat. Anz., 1934,79, 65. Two more papers on Anuran Craniology have appeared since.Google Scholar
  44. du Toit, C. A.Anat. Anz., 1938,86, 388.Google Scholar
  45. Reinbach, W.Jenai. Zeitschr. Naturwiss., 1939,72, 211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1939

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. S. Ramaswami
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of Mysore, Central CollegeBangalore

Personalised recommendations