Advertisement

The influence of disturbed conditions and increased solar activity on geomagnetic distortion of the equatorial ionospheric F2 region

  • B. N. Bhargava
  • R. V. Subrahmanyan
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The principal diurnal anomalies in the maximum electron density of ionospheric F2 layer over Kodaikanal are discussed. From an analysis of data obtained over half a solar cycle, it has been found that the phenomena of rapid increase in the electron densities following sunrise, the diurnal asymmetry and the maintenance of abnormally high ionic densities after sunset undergo systematic changes during stormy conditions. In order to examine whether these changes are accounted for by additional movements during disturbed conditions, magnitudes of movement terms of the continuity equation at three heights, for the quiet as well as the disturbed days, have been computed and discussed. The changes in the pattern of diurnal variation of N m F2 with solar activity and the mechanism responsible for these changes are also discussed. From an analysis of published F2 layer data obtained at a number of stations with magnetic dip between ± 40°, it has been shown that the ratio of morning to afternoon peak densities yields a fair measure of equatorial F2 layer distortion anomaly. From solar cycle variation in diurnal asymmetry, an attempt has been made to estimate the extent by which the anomalous belt widens during sunspot maximum.

Keywords

Solar Activity Sunspot Number Main Magnetic Field Solar Cycle Variation Sunspot Maximum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

10. References

  1. 1.
    Appleton, E. V. and Piggott, W. R.J. Atmosph. Terr. Phys., 1952,2, 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Applaton, E. V. .. “Some ionospheric results obtained during the I.G.Y.”,Proceedings of the Symposipm Organised by the URSI/AGI Committee, Brussels, (1959), Edited by W. J. G. Beynon, 1960, p. 4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berkner, L. V. and Seaton, S. L.Terr. Mag. and Atmos. Elec., 1940,45, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Egedal, J... ——Ibid., 1947,52, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferraro, V. C. A... ——Ibid., 1945,50, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirono, M. and Maeda, H.J. Geomagn. Geoelectt 1954,6, 127.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martyn, D. F...Proc. Roy. Soc., 1953,218 A, 1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    —————..Report of Conference on Physics of the Ionosphere, Physical Society, London, 1954, 257.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsushita, S. ..Proceedings of Mixed Commission on the Ionosphere, Third Meeting (Canberra), 1952, p. 124.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ratcliffe, J. A., Schmerling, E. R., Setty, C. S. G. K. and Thomas, J. O.Phil. Trans., 1956,248 A, 621.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skinner, N. J. and Wright, R. W.J. Atmosph. Terr. Phys., 1955,6, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schmerling, E. R. and Ventrice, C. A. ——Ibid., 1959,14, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1962

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. N. Bhargava
    • 1
  • R. V. Subrahmanyan
    • 1
  1. 1.Astrophysical ObservatoryKodaikanal

Personalised recommendations